Posted by Al; [Aldurant] on October 28, 1999 at 20:01:26 {BrTq3yWfsYTuVDrDAE3Yt74NX2uzuA}:
In Reply to: ********Jan/AL:Inspired Prophecy! posted by Bibleman on October 28, 1999 at 17:47:15:
What is "vague" Gary, is their application, not the multiple choice of dates and people. That's a matter of a couple of alternatives. What is "vague" is why these choices are made. What makes it seem more vague is when you see the history of interpretation and watch it change century after century.
What I have "claimed" is that I want to see your sources. If you doubt that we can terminate our conversation if you choose.
As far as when the date lands, etc., I'm open. The tough part with me is showing it's application, manefestation and relevance.
As far as the various references, and why I need them all: I don't do the "belief" thing. Like I've made my mind up before I have considered other viable arguments. I must hear them all because I will encounter the other arguments also.
More references? Yes. Look. I'm a reader. I don't have a preconceived need to believe a particular thing. I want to see it all. I have been watching these chronology debates for the good part of a year. I want to know what the deal is and get an astroprogram.
Al