***Jan/AL:Inspired Prophecy!


[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Al; [Aldurant] on October 27, 1999 at 19:04:07 {dPkPwxsNJEmlvf6PLwvct74NX2uzuA}:

In Reply to: **Jan/AL:Inspired Prophecy! posted by Bibleman on October 27, 1999 at 17:22:40:


What is a Bicalist?

You yourself have "corrected" others. I have seen chronology arguments on this board for nine month and read Biblical interpretation going back 250 years. You can say there are not disputes over chronology, but there are.

:So no matter what, the prophecies were not supposed to even be fulfilled until the 20th Century. 607, 587 and 529 yield 1914, 1934 and 1992!

So what happened? And what is the proof that it did?

:So sorrrrrrrry, but the prophecies are much more specific than that because of the chronology and there is no convenient way out by claiming persons simply corrected them, say to fit their own time and scenarios.

I don't claim that people "corrected" prophetic interpretation. It is a fact, and it's not my fault. And I'm hardly looking for convenience. I have a lifetime of significant tests to prove it. "Correct" = propose a different interpretation from someone else.

:I can see why you might want to ignore Bible prophecy, though, if don't understand this.

I have to say, Gary, I resent this. I have studied the Bible for over 25 years, and probably given thousands of talks on it. I have never "ignored" it, or anything it says. If you are out of facts, you can at least refrain from insults. I don't agree with you. This does not equal "ignore".

What I have done cannot be called "ignore" and it cannot be called "dismiss", implying a lack of investigation. You have nothing but arithetic. How do we know what happened in the fullfillment phase? However much I have asked, you have done nothing but cite arithmetic. I have seen twenty versions of this. Nobody has shown evidence that anything happened. Jesus, according to the Bible, show evidence, so did the apostles, but no one since. Just claims. What happened Gary? What is your evidence that prophetic things happened when the arithmetic says they should have? And what were those things?

:So before you dismiss the Bible's prophecies as completely vague and generalized, you must first understand all that is involved.

I need evidence, not just arithmetic. Arithmetic is theory. Without evidence, maybe it should happen, but did it, and what was it that happened, and how do we know? If I tell you that a certain stock will go up at a certain date, but the Dow says it didn't, do I tell you that it went up invisibly?

You knoiw Gary, you play this role like you want to explain things to me, but I ask you specific questions, most pertenent ones, and you completely ignore them. Like:
1. What is JIOR?
2. What are some printed refernces for what you are talking about? You told me that others used the same chronology as you. Where do I get the printed material?

If you don't answer my questions on the subject, we are not really discussing it, it is just you talking to yourself.


:At any rate, the presumption of updating prophecies is incorrect since the chronology does not permit it.

Gary, this is lunacy. You have just written that you corrected it and fixed "discrepancies".


:And the Bible proved absolutely true!

You have shown your "corrected" arithmetic. You claimed some people who are unknown to me saw a sign. Get a dictionary and look up "proved".

Gary, you are ignoring most of what I am saying, and you keep repeating this arithmetic, like it's supposed to be some virtue to believe it. I ask you specific questions, many of them and you utterly ignore them. I have no more time for this. When you decide to post evidence, note this in your post title and I will respond. More aritmetic, no.

On to your next post.

Sincerely, Al


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: ****Jan/AL:Inspired Prophecy!

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]