The Center for Jewish-Arab Economic Development in cooperation with Konrad Adenauer Stiftung

 

The Israeli & Palestinian Business Leaders Forum

Wednesday, January 30, 2002

 

 

Part Three of Three

 

DR. EREKAT: Concerning the concept of Jihad, I think we have a deep cultural difference here. I don't find it my job, as a professor of politics, to go into the meanings of Jihad, small and big. It doesn't serve any purpose.

 

To you, Jihad means something bad. To Moslems and Palestinians, the word Jihad means something good for their children, boys and girls. But it doesn't necessarily mean that in the cultural gap. I don't think Arafat meant Jihad the way you understood it, and that's the truth.

 

MR. BOCIEN: What do you understand a Palestinian understands when he hears the word Jihad?

 

DR. EREKAT: The bigger Jihad is patience, building the society, steadfastness. The smaller Jihad is fighting. The same thing applies to martyrdom, which holds a very high place in Islam. And it happens to people who are underdogs or who have been treated unfairly. That's the concept, the insinuation of the concept.

 

MR. BOCIEN: It doesn't mean war against us?

 

DR. EREKAT: No. Not when Arafat speaks about it. But I can't convince anybody about that, to be honest with you.

 

MR. BIDERMAN: You're doing a very good job.

 

DR. EREKAT: With regard to Rani's question about a solution, why we came so close and did not sign, we always say that we don't interfere in Israeli internal affairs and the Israelis say they don't interfere in our internal affairs. They say it for public consumption. In reality, we are the internal affairs of the others.

 

That day in October when I heard that there would be elections for Prime Minister, I asked, Why do that? We knew that Barak came to Camp David with no government. We knew many people had left him. Still, even with your laws, we have till May for general elections. Between October and May, there's time. We can finish. Why hold elections in February? Honestly, what was needed at the end of the day was time.

 

MR. COHEN: Fine. That was then. But what do we do now?

 

DR. EREKAT: As far as Arafat and Sharon are concerned, I witnessed that. One day, Sharon saw me walking by and grabbed me to come sit down. But one day, I was sitting with Clinton and Netanyahu and Ehud and so on, and then Sharon entered. Arafat stood up and extended his hand to him like this (indicating), and Sharon refused to shake his hand. That was in October 1998, long before the Intifada he's blaming everything on.

 

So there is something with Sharon. What do you want? This wasn't born last year when Sharon was elected as Prime Minister of Israel. It's not up to me to come and test where Sharon belongs or why these people say these things. Many times I see him calling us Taliban and Al Qaeda, and I leave him a message that you can say whatever you want about politics. You can attack me personally. You can say that my politics stinks, they're no good, dishonest, whatever.

 

But after all, there is something called human decency, and I can't sink to that level as some Palestinians or Israelis do when describing each other. Arafat and Sharon were elected. I don't have expectations that Arafat and Sharon will sign a permanent status agreement. We want to begin the process.

 

About the future, I said something about Mitchell and Tenet. I do not overload my expectations. I do not exaggerate them. But we need a process to begin. Under current circumstances, ask anyone, nothing will change. There is the absence of a process, of a mechanism to enable people to communicate in a civilized manner.

 

It's so easy for Israelis to think that Palestinians are no good, they're bad, they're terrorists, kill them; and for Palestinians to think the same way. You don't need to explain anything when you get to that point. You're using your fingers, not your brains.

 

About the Israeli reactions to the recent suicide bombings -- which we condemn, by the way, in the strongest possible term. We don't condone the killings of Israelis or Palestinians under any circumstances -- I don't know. So far, I'm still a Palestinian, so I don't know why Israelis react one way or another. Sometimes, the Israelis sound to me like a group of cats outside my window. When they scream, I don't know whether they're making love or fighting. Many times it confuses me. Sometimes I expect something logically to happen and it doesn't happen. So sometimes you stop expecting anymore.

 

On the strategic plan of the Palestinian Authority, the only strategy we can afford -- because sometimes I touch my head. Sometimes I think, do we have a sign on our foreheads saying Stupid? You can say anything you'd like about Arafat, but he's not stupid.

 

Take the ship issue. From day one we heard about it, fine. We contacted the Israelis and said, Can you come meet with one of us, and please, if you have any information, let's just get to the bottom of this. No. General Zinni came. How about a trilateral commission to get to the truth? No.

 

We have a problem of accountability with you and with the United States. Anything we say will not be believed. I asked the Europeans. I asked the Russians. Nobody want to touch it. Okay. So I'm guilty till proven innocent. I can be hanged, and then after my hanging I'll be given an unfair trial.

 

Is Arafat going to take on Israel with 50 tons of weapons? I saw with my own eyes the Khomeini of Iran in private with his Koran saying about Arafat and his colleagues, kill them all, and now we're in a strategic alliance. I don't think these people want to do anything other than rid us of the Palestinian Authority.

 

I'm not saying there aren't some Palestinians -- I asked General Zinni, How many persons were caught involved in espionage for the Soviet Union? Does that implicate your entire nation? I'm not saying who did it or who didn't. I need to know the truth. Sometimes it's free of charge. What is it?

 

So the only strategy for us, till today, is to continue our commitment to the peace process and to the December 16 speech of President Arafat. Do Palestinians see through Arafat's eyes and hear through his ears and speak with his tongue? No. No. Honestly.

 

When people tell me that Arafat wants this and Arafat wants that, Arafat is my President. He was elected, and I work for him as my President. My job is to tell Arafat that these are the options you have, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. We meet, and that's how decision-making is done. If I don't like something I can give in my resignation.

 

Why do you insinuate that we deal with Arafat in this way? We don't. He listens, and he better listen to us. And that is the truth. I work for President Arafat just like Gil worked with Barak. And I have more guts in front of Arafat than he had in front of Barak.

 

But this is stereotyping of Arafat. We may agree with him. We may disagree. He may scream and shout and get angry at certain of our positions, and we may present our case and leave the room and go home, and take the phone off the hook for four days sometimes. We are human. If somebody taught you in the Israeli schools that Palestinians are perfect, we're not. We're not.

 

On separation, we ask the Israelis what they mean by separation, because what do you call what we have today around each village and the refugee camps in the West Bank? There's literally no movement. I don't want to tell you about how I got to this meeting here today. Sometimes I tell myself, you have so little dignity. Just sit in your house and don't leave.

 

But what can you do? What can you do in separation? Separation, to us, means unilateral steps whereby Israel will suffocate the Palestinians, destroy their economy, destroy their infrastructure and their livelihood, under the pretext of security.

 

Okay. Let's have an agreement on separation. Why can't we discuss this? Why can't we sit down and see what can be done? What I hear from Landau -- you have some ministers now that I don't know what to say about Israel anymore. I heard of a minister in the Israeli Cabinet whose son got in a fight with another boy in school and he goes and beats that child. God. What can I say? But it's none of my business.

 

They don't need to humiliate Palestinians under the pretext of separation. Palestinians will never accept Israeli occupation. There is this way that we are killing them. Don't accept occupation, but we will end the occupation through a meaningful peace process, negotiations, and we will do it. It's doable. This is the line.

 

There are other Palestinians now who look at the humiliation, at the suffering and despair and the desperate situation on the ground, and they say there's another way. And these angry ideas about war and this and that prevent Palestinians from coming to us, and it just adds to the complexities.

 

There is no trust. That's true. People don't trust Arafat. Okay. Tomorrow morning, I'll begin a campaign in my home town of Jericho. I'll order the imam in the mosque to start reciting bad things about him. I'll order the local radio station to start saying bad things about him. I'll order the school teachers to start lecturing about him. And then I want him to go to Jericho and see how many people will trust him.

 

They don't know him. Public opinion is not something inborn. It's something we create. It's fashionable in Israeli society today that those good Israeli candidates who can get the most votes are those who can inflict more suffering on the Palestinians, who can harm the Palestinians and show how strong and tough they can get.

 

By the way, don't think that, when I stand in Jericho or Nablus or Gaza, I am popular for what I'm saying to you. Believe me, I'm not popular. My ideas are not popular. Many Palestinians feel sorry for me. I was a professor to some of them. People come and say to me, You don't even own a private car. Go back to the university. This is the truth.

 

So there is a systematic campaign against Arafat, begun by Mr. Barak, who wanted to prove to the Israelis that it wasn't his mistake. The only time Barak agreed to meet Arafat was when Saeb Erekat ran after him in Camp David one day when he was walking by. I said to him, Ehud, you're from the Middle East. He's 71 years old. Go have a cup of tea with him. And I brought him to have a cup of tea.

 

I made the tea, and they talked about the weather in the morning and in the afternoon, sunshine and then windy, and that was the discussion between the two brave leaders who wanted to conclude an agreement in Camp David.

 

Then Barak comes and says we made an offer. I wish to God I could see this offer. I wish to God Barak would reduce it to writing. He never did.

 

I know the world is changing around us. People are sick and tired of Israelis and Palestinians. They want to help us, but nobody will help us unless we help ourselves. The Americans will be the happiest people on earth if tonight they hear that the Israelis and Palestinians are meeting and producing a road map for the next step tomorrow.

 

And the Europeans the same, because we know we are now the obstacle to many things that are changing around the world. Look at what's happening in Cyprus. It's happening all over. North and South Sudan.

 

You can do anything unilaterally, but in negotiations you need a partner. That's the truth. That's the truth about the future. The future lies in our ability to communicate, to sit down and use all the damage control mechanisms and crisis management abilities that we have.

 

That's how we begin. We have to begin somewhere. But in spite of all the things we've done, now we're just back to the point where we don't trust them and they don't trust us. They want to destroy us. It's bringing us to the point of catastrophe.

 

That's the popular Palestinian sentiment on the streets now, that after we have recognized them, after they told us they stand next to us for peace, they fooled us. And now they won't negotiate with anybody and they will break our necks.

 

I don't like going through these old points because the Palestinians blame me. If they don't blame me with their words, they blame me with their eyes or with the statements they tell me. And the soldiers blame me. They tell me, We don't want to do this. You failed.

 

I think we should do more with the Israeli population. You should do more with the Palestinian population. That's where we make the difference. If this peace process goes down, if Arafat goes down, if the Palestinian Authority goes down, if the Palestinian voices of courage, wisdom and farsightedness are silenced, what's happening out there now will be just the tip of the iceberg of what's yet to come.

 

Once I was having a discussion with Itzik Mordechai in Martin Indyk's home. I said to him, You know what? I am a professor of political science. I did major research for many many years, and I found out that the majority of Jews will not convert to Christianity or Islam, and the majority of Christians and Moslems will not convert to Judaism. What do you do with them? You're supposed to protect your people, not tomorrow, not at the next elections.

 

Honest to God, ladies and gentlemen -- and with this I will end -- I respected Rabin so much. He was a Prime Minister who was thinking of Israel's interests 200 years from today. Later Israeli Prime Ministers only care about the eight o'clock or the nine o'clock news.

 

We need to make it happen. We need every voice. If our Israeli colleagues are willing to meet, we are unconditionally sanctioned and mandated by Arafat immediately, tonight, anytime, to begin a process of communication, damage control, any mechanisms possible to start breaking this cycle. Thank you very much.

 

MR. BIDERMAN: Thank you very much.

 

 

 

 

Back to Part 1

 

Back to Part 2

 

Return to Biography