Click here
to look for "chess" with the Google search engine.
|
(Navigation bar ******* © A.J. Goldsby, **************** Click HERE **************** Click HERE ****************
**************** Buy a book
|
The opening theory of Linares, 2004.Several openings - like The Sveshnikov System / Pelikan, of The Sicilian Defense - got a real workout. Some of these games are VERY important to opening theory. (Some of these openings, like 3.Nc3!? in the Sicilian - that was played a total of six times - resulted in FIVE very short and rather boring draws. A terribly dull system!!) After 1.e4, c5; 2.Nf3, Nc6; the normal move here be 3.d2-d4. But instead in Round 2, (# 2.) Kasparov chose the move, 3.Nc3!? (I guess to avoid Radjabov's pet Sveshnikov Sicilian.) Kasparov pressed on for a very long time, eventually missing a couple of wins before finally deciding to draw. This was a real game, apparently Kasparov wanted to win.) Play continued: 3...e5!?; 4.Bc4, with a very closed game. This
opening was repeated in the following encounters: None of the games, after the second round, were even remotely exciting, at least not in my opinion. Only one was even of any real value to theory. (Topalov's games versus Kramnik in the last round.) There White appeared to have tremendous play ... but the players agreed to a draw. *** I won't give you the games, you can easily download them from either the ChessBase web site, or LCC's, "The Week In Chess." We saw a few games in the Ruy Lopez ... this opening was actually used quite a lot. It was the feature game in the round where Topalov brilliant defeated Shirov in the Tchigorin System. (The Closed Systems, 9...Na5.) This game will drastically change opening theory, an entire sub-system of this opening may have been blown out of the water here!! Kasparov also narrowly missed defeating Topalov - EXTREMELY brilliantly - in a Ruy Lopez in Round # 13. There were a few short draws in the Ruy - but this was the fault of the players, and not the opening. Another
trend that did not start in Linares - but definitely continued here, was the
refusal of any player (on the White side) to allow or accept the (Stay tuned for more thoughts on the theory of Linares.)
Click HERE to return to my Home Page for this site. Click here to return to my page for "Chess News." Click here to go or return to my page for coverage of Linares, 2004. (Or just use the 'back' button on your web browser.) Copyright (c) A.J. Goldsby I Copyright
(©) A.J. Goldsby, 1995 - 2008. ******* This page was last updated on 06/25/09 . |