Country name:
Pakistan
Conventional long form: Islamic Democratic Pakistan
Data code: PK
Government type: Federal republic
Capital: Islamabad
Background: The separation in 1947 of British India into the Muslim
state of Pakistan (with two sections West and East) and largely Hindu India was
never satisfactorily resolved. A third war between these countries in 1971 resulted
in East Pakistan seceding and becoming the separate nation of Bangladesh. A dispute
over the state of Kashmir is ongoing. In response to Indian nuclear weapons testing,
Pakistan conducted its own tests in 1998.
Administrative divisions: 4 provinces, 1 territory*,
and 1 capital territory**; Balochistan, Federally Administered Tribal Areas*, Islamabad
Capital Territory**, North-West Frontier, Punjab, Sindh
note: the Pakistani-administered portion of the disputed Jammu and Kashmir region
includes Azad Kashmir and the Northern Areas
Independence: 14 August 1947 (from UK)
National holiday: Pakistan Day, 23 March (1956) (proclamation of
the republic)
Constitution: 10 April 1973, suspended 5 July 1977, restored with
amendments 30 December 1985; suspended 15 October 1999
Legal system: based on English common law with provisions to accommodate
Pakistan's status as an Islamic state; accepts compulsory ICJ jurisdiction, with
reservations
Suffrage: 21 years of age; universal; separate electorates and
reserved parliamentary seats for non-Muslims
Executive branch:
note: Following a military takeover on 12 October 1999, Chief of
Army Staff and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, Gen. Pervez MUSHARRAF
suspended Pakistan's constitution and assumed the additional title of Chief Executive;
exercising the powers of the head of the government, he appointed an eight-member
National Security Council to function as Pakistan's supreme governing body; President
Mohammad Rafiq TARAR remained the ceremonial chief of state.
In 2001, General Pervaiz Musharraf took over the charge from Rafiq Tarar and became
the President of Pakistan
Chief of state: President General Pervaiz Musharraf (since June December 2001)
Head of government: Prime Minister Mir Zafarullah Khan Jamali (since December 2002)
Cabinet: Cabinet appointed by the Prime Minister
Elections: According to the 1973 constitution of Pakistan election
are hold throughout the country right after the term of 5 years. As General Pervaiz
Mushhraf dissolved all assemblies and senate after Military Take over on 12th of
October 1999, he promised to hold the general election with in 3 years. So according
to that on 10th October 2002, General Elections hold in the country in which PML
(Q), MMA alliance of 6 religious parties, PPPP, MQM , PML(N) ,National Alliance.
Mir Zafarullah Khan Jamali nominated candidate of PML(Q) and allied parties became
the Prime Minister after getting the 173 votes from National Assembly.
Election results: Mir Zafarullah Khan Jamali became the Prime Minsiter of Islamic
Republic of Pakistan. And after resolving the LFO issue between government and MMA,
President General Pervaiz Musharraf soon will get the Vote of Confidence from National
Assembly, All provincial Assemblies and Senate and become the President for next
5 years.
Political parties and leaders:
note: Gen. Pervez MUSHARRAF dissolved Parliament following the military takeover
of 12 October 1999, however, political parties have been allowed to operate; Awami
National Party or ANP [Wali KHAN]; Balochistan National Movement/Hayee Group or
BNM/H [Dr. HAYEE Baluch]; Balochistan National Movement/Mengal Group or BNM/M [Sardar
Akhtar MENGAL]; Baluch National Party or BNP [leader NA]; Jamhoori Watan Party or
JWP [Akbar Khan BUGTI]; Jamiat-al-Hadith or JAH [leader NA]; Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam,
Fazlur Rehman faction or JUI/F; Jamiat Ulema-i-Pakistan, Niazi faction or JUP/NI
[leader NA]; Millat Part [Farooq LEGHARI]; Milli Yakjheti Council or MYC is an umbrella
organization which includes Jamaat-i-Islami or JI [Qazi Hussain AHMED], Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam,
Sami-ul-Haq faction or JUI/S, and Jamiat Ulema-i-Pakistan, Noorani faction or JUP/NO;
Mutahida Qaumi Movement, Altaf faction or MQM/A [Altaf HUSSAIN], MMA Mutahida Majlisay
Amal ,Alliance of 6 religious parties [President Maulana Shah Ahmed Noorani],National
Alliance [President Ghulma Mustafa gataoi] ,National People's Party or NPP [Ghulam
Mustapha JATOI]; Pakhtun Khwa Milli Awami Party or PKMAP [Mahmood Khan ACHAKZAI];
Pakhtun Quami Party or PKQP [Mohammed AFZAL Khan]; Pakistan Awami Tehrik or PAT
[Tahir ul QADRI]; Pakistan Muslim League Quaid-I-Azam Group [ President Chaudary
Shujaat Hussain] ,Pakistan Muslim League, Functional Group or PML/F [Pir PAGARO];
Pakistan Muslim League, Junejo faction or PML/J [Hamid Nasir CHATTHA]; Pakistan
Muslim League, Nawaz Sharif faction or PML/N [Nawaz SHARIF]; Pakistan National Party
or PNP [leader NA]; Pakistan People's Party or PPP [Benazir BHUTTO]; Pakistan People's
Party/Shaheed Bhutto or PPP/SB [Ghinva BHUTTO]; Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaaf or PTI
[Imran KHAN]
note: political alliances in Pakistan can shift frequently
Political pressure groups and leaders: military remains important political force;
ulema (clergy), landowners, industrialists, and small merchants also influential
International organization participation: AsDB, C (suspended), CCC, CP, ECO, ESCAP,
FAO, G-19, G-24, G-77, IAEA, IBRD, ICAO, ICC, ICFTU, ICRM, IDA, IDB, IFAD, IFC,
IFRCS, IHO, ILO, IMF, IMO, Inmarsat, Intelsat, Interpol, IOC, IOM, ISO, ITU, MINURSO,
MONUC, NAM, OAS (observer), OIC, OPCW, PCA, SAARC, UN, UNAMSIL, UNCTAD, UNESCO,
UNHCR, UNIDO, UNIKOM, UNITAR, UNMIBH, UNMIK, UNMOP, UNOMIG, UNTAET, UPU, WCL, WFTU,
WHO, WIPO, WMO, WToO, WTrO
Diplomatic representation in the US:
Chief of mission: Ambassador Mr. Ashraf Jehangir Qazi
2315 Massachusetts Avenue,N.W.Washington,D.C.20008,U.S.A.
Telephone: [1] 202-939-6200
FAX: [1] 202-387-0484
Telex: 440058 PRP UR UI
consulate(s) general: Los Angeles and New York
Pakistan Military 2003
Military branches: Army, Navy, Air Force, Civil Armed Forces, National Guard
Military manpower - military age: 17 years of age
Military manpower - availability:
males age 15-49: 34,632,509 (2000 est.)
Military manpower - fit for military service:
males age 15-49: 21,206,148 (2000 est.)
Military manpower - reaching military age annually:
males: 1,604,806 (2000 est.)
Military expenditures - dollar figure: $2.435 billion (FY99/00)
Military expenditures - percent of GDP: 3.9% (FY99/00)
Pakistan Economy 2000
The Asian Development Bank (ADB) has reviewed the progress of Pakistan's economy
during the 2003-04. The Pakistan economic update released by the ADB Islamabad office
last week makes an interesting reading. By any standard it is an objective assessment
of the situation describing Pakistan economy in 2003-2004 as a mixed bag of success
and failures.
One of the prominent feature of the ADB report is that, unlike the documents and
statements emanating from government quarters which highlights only the positive
achievement. This report also records and bring to the public notice the negative
aspects and areas of failures in various sectors. The report also reveals some of
the deficiencies in the policies as well as in its implementation.
The economy's overall growth performance, according to the ADB, showed a sharp improvement
in 2003-04 with the GDP growth rate increasing to 5.1 per cent from 3.5 per cent
in the previous year. The improvement with broad-based, with agriculture, manufacturing
and services, all recording higher growth and the trend is likely to be consolidated
in 2003-04. The fiscal deficit and inflation declined and the current account surplus
and foreign exchange reserves rose to all-time high levels.
Another significant development was the sharp fall in average lending rate from
13.1 per cent to 7.6 per cent per annum. As a result of this unprecedented decline
in interest rates and upsurge in economic activity, borrowings by the private sector,
including export finance, shot up from Rs.37.7 billion to Rs.153.6 billion. There
was also a boom in the stock market and market capitalization almost doubled during
2002-03.
However, while the economic fundamentals looked promising, there was no dent in
poverty or any acceleration in investment. According to the ADB, the poverty level
deteriorated from 30.6 per cent in 1998-99 to 32.1 per cent in 2001-02 despite a
revision of poverty definition to get the desired numbers. The government reduced
the standard per capita Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) from 2550 to 2350, it
still yielded a poverty estimate for below the international estimates. Although
official unemployment rate was only 7.82 per cent, hundreds and thousands of people
were being added to the ranks of unemployed every year due to the population growth
rate of 2.1 per cent. Gross fixed investment remained stagnant at 13.1 per cent
while gross national savings increased from 17.0 per cent to 19.2 per cent due entirely
to higher workers remittances from abroad. Domestic savings, on the other hand declined
from 16.1 per cent to 14.7 per cent. An important observation in this context was
that most of the investment was not meant for new enterprises and private sector
credit off-take went mostly for working capital requirements. New money flows were
largely going to the stocks and real estate resulting in sky-high prices of these
assets and this may be a matter of serious concern in year's time. There were also
some signs of slackening of fiscal adjustment effort due mainly to a 15 per cent
hike in public sector salaries and the continuing losses in public sector enterprises
(PSEs), particularly in the power sector.
The ADB also revealed some of the deficiencies in development spending and its effectiveness.
Spending under public sector development programme and poverty reduction strategy
were very low during the first three quarters, but large scale releases in the fourth
quarters to show higher utilization compromised the quality of delivery and resulted
in leakage. Giving an example of the poor quality of spending and its outcome, the
ADB country representative, Marshuk Ali Shah said that only 30 middle schools were
operational out of 300 schools funded by his organization during the last three
years. Another 6000 facilities funded by the ADB were also not working and similar
was the fate of assistance from other donors.
Most of the observations of the update are based on a proper assessment of the prevailing
situation and need to be carefully analyzed by the policy makers in order to rectify
the faults in various areas of economic management. It is good to see that economists
in the ADB have not been unduly influenced by the government's publicity of "all
is well and take-off stage" but have applied themselves to determining the emerging
weaknesses that retard of reverse the process made on various fronts so far. Some
of the facts highlighted by the ADB need urgent attention. For instance, it has
been made abundantly clear that it is not just the lack of resources that hit the
economy but their poor management and frequent shortfalls in the utilization of
available funds in the public sector that further aggravate the vulnerabilities
of the economy.
For instance Pakistan could utilize only one per cent of the loan advanced by the
ADB for flood protection projects since 1997. The loan sanctioned of an amount of
$100 million and the projects identified were badly needed. Director of the Asian
Development Bank, Marshuk Ali Shah, in a meeting with Minister for Water and power,
Aftab Ahmad Khan Sherpao, here asked for expeditious loan utilization to obtain
results in prescribed time. ADB is providing $100 million interest-free loan with
only one per cent service charges for Floods Protection Projects approved on November
13, 1997. It was required under the conditions of the loan that it should be utilized
by 2005, but after a lapse of 74 per cent time only about one per cent or $1.244
million, has been utilized so far.
According to another report, Pakistan has dropped 13 World Bank projects worth $2.3408
billion, including bank's contribution of $1.0317 billion during 1997-2001.
The reasons of dropping the projects were inter government disharmony and delay
in implementation of agreed reforms. A few of these projects are again under consideration
of the government and the bank might include these in the coming assistance.
However, the bank has shown reluctance to work with the government departments which
are very slow in implementation. Bank officials are of the view that sometimes the
response from a government office comes after two months, which should come in a
week.