The following lecture was given during a ‘secret’
meeting by an ‘elite’ group controlling the world’s commerce in a ‘secret’
place in the city of Philadelphia. It is designed to educate the son of one a
member to the secret wisdom of the rich. Speaker W takes the floor and begins
to speak:
“In order to maintain our system of power, the
institution of universal public education is indispensable. The anarchy of
private education is which any manner of dangerous ideas could be spread cannot
be tolerated, thus we make private education financially impossible to all but
a few, mostly the elite offspring of our financial entourage, by means
burdensome taxation and regulation. The primary purpose of public education is
to inculcate the idea those popular national heroes to blunt the past power of
the malefactors of great wealth created our crucial institutions of coercion
and monopoly for the public good. Crucial is to create the impression that,
although the people have been exploited in the past, today the wealthy are at
the mercy of an all-powerful government which is firmly in the hands of the
people or do-Gooding liberals.
For those of more sophistication who reject this
Pollyanna view of reality, we promote the “liberal reformer mentality” which
holds that a new area of reform is on the verge of crushing forever that last
vestiges of money lordism. Of course the reforms, after taking shape as a
bewildering myriad of regulatory agencies and taxes, are found to be
ineffective in subordinating our power to the popular will, whereupon we stir
up another era of progressive reform.
Our contrived Left-Right spectrum, which our
compulsory education helps to make universal, is valuable in assuring that this
charade does not get out of hand. The Pollyanna’s in the middle neither
dangerous nor useful in this endeavor. What is needed is a feeble, but
persistent right-conservatism in moderate and emasculate the liberal reforms.
Conservatives tend to resist all the advances in centralized, government power
that we lead the liberals to see as necessary in order to end the
“undemocratic” power of money in society…”
“The right has such a fear of the Left’s dream of
democratic collectivism and the Left such a hatred for what it sees as the
Right’s elitist, rugged individualism that there is little danger that they
will ever join forces to overturn our government-backed monopolies even though
we violate the ideals of both Left and Right…”
“We do not want an education system that produces
hard-driving individuals bent on amassing great wealth and power. Therefore, we
discourage education that stresses knowledge for its own sake or even sophistry
and sterile mental gymnastics is of no danger to us. “Relevant,” vocational, or
career-oriented education also poses no danger to our power. Education that
prepares students to accept a cog-like existence in our military-industrial
social-welfare regulation complex is ideal. Progressive education with its stress
on “social adjustment” also produced a
certain amount of disruptive competitiveness among the participants, but
primarily had the effect of creating life-long voyeuristic spectators who will
enthusiastically sublimate their competitiveness into endless hours of
following college and professional sports in the boob tube. Space spectaculars
and dramatic political infighting are also marvelous diversions with which to
occupy the masses.”
“Anyone seeking social change will gravitate to the
field of education. Our strategy is simple: Let only those succeed whose
influence would develop the passive or receptive mode of existence. Discourage
all who promote the aggressive or active capacities. Build a great cult of our
education, touting it as the “democratic” path to success. Deride the frontal
approach to success of the “outmoded” rugged individualist.”
“Before yielding the floor to Professor X., who will
discuss the role of secret societies and prestigious clubs, I would like to
comment on the demise of religions education as a vehicle for social control.
Religion, in its time, was a remarkable weapon for inculcating subservience,
altruism, and self-abnegation among our subjects. We did not give up the weapon
voluntarily. Your grandfather for one supported the Baptist faith well after
most finance capitalists had turned wholly to secular ideologies. However, a
trend toward rationality in human affairs plods along inexorably quite outside
the reach of our Power. Only in our totalitarian dictatorships can this trend
be quashed entirely. In the semi-open societies in which our money power is
based, the forces of reason can only be impeded and diverted. Some have
theorized that, eventually, widespread rational egoism will overturn our order,
I am confidant that secular faiths and just plain confusion will suffice to
sustain our power for many centuries to come.”
GEORGE
BUSH and The bin LADENS
President Bush got his Homeland Security bill passes
through Congress in December 2002 thereby costing the taxpayers another month
of work to pay off their taxes each year. Homeland Security is another
department of the Executive Branch of government, which is answerable to the
President. Hitler had his SS and now Bush has his ‘HS’.
“Treat the public a mushroom. Keep them in the dark
and feed them horse manure.”
We are supposed to have three branches of government
of equal power to keep the balance of power. The Legislative, Judicial, and
Executive Branch are all supposed to be equal. It was set up that way by our
founding fathers. Now the president has another 170,000 employees working for
him, which upsets the balance of power. Lets hope they don’t turn against him.
The Presidential manual that they give to all incoming
Presidents titled, “How to Rule America like a King” is out of date. It seems
our president is making the wrong decision based on historical “Wag The Dog”
tactics.
Even the American public is getting
wise to the “Wag-The-Dog” tactics thanks to the movie of the same name. When
the economy is in a slump you don’t fix it by starting a frivolous war so that
people can feel better when the war is over to make the stock market go up.
Even the other nations are becoming increasingly aware of these tactics.
President George Bush doesn’t have a choice
not to go to war! The Oil companies who contributed to his campaign did so with
the stipulation the he secure new oil fields for them to plunder. These are the
real sand pirates. President Bush will go ahead and use taxpayer’s money and
the military to make rich oil people richer. When you send your son or daughter
overseas to give their lives for America you can tell them they are fighting to
make the rich people richer.
Osama bin Laden’s men did Bush a favor when they blew
up the World Trade Center. When a ‘lame duck president’ (one who wins the
electoral vote and not the popular vote) takes office, one of the rules of the
game is to create some kind of national emergency. This is done so that the
nation will then be under Marshall Law. No one can question the President’s
authority or even sue him when the ‘security’ of the nation is at stake. Even
if he makes the wrong decisions the nation must support him.
George Bush used to work for Osama’s brother, Salem.
Both Osama bin laden and George bush have strong ties to the oil companies and
are in the same business together.
Vice President Dick Chaney used to be chairman of the
Halliburton Corporation, which was busted for dealing with Libya in 1995.
(Source: Judicial Watch Report.) Bush’s father George Bush Senior was head of
the CIA under Reagan and before that he too was in the oil business. He had a
deal with Osama bin Laden to secure the oil fields in Pakistan so that the
Soviets wouldn’t get them. Osama bin laden used to work for the CIA fighting
against the Russians.
US News & World Report’s October 2001 issue: Osama
bin Laden
“…The 17th son of a Saudi construction magnate, he ventured into
Afghanistan in the early 1980’s to fight the Soviets. He helped fund and train
a kind of Islamic foreign legion, and he learned the ways of guerrilla war.
Later, when Iraq invaded Kuwait bin Laden offered his militias to the Saudi
defense; the King invited U.S. forces instead. Enraged at the presence of
“infidels” in Islam’s holiest land, bin laden turned his wrath on America. With
his military experience, a personal fortune, and a roster of battle-hardened
militant Islamite's, Bin Laden forged an extraordinary network of terrorists,
allying himself with groups from Algeria to the Philippines. That network
became al Qaeda.”