WANTED.
A NEW U N CONVENTION ON DRUGS
By
Dr
R. G. Lampart
The
Solicitor General has warned the Government that any move to decriminalize Marijuana would find Jamaica in breach of the international
conventions which it ratified and would place the country at odds with its
treaty obligations on drug control with possible serious consequences. At the
time of these conventions the UN had before it documents from the various
countries concerning the drugs to be discussed .The document on Marijuana stated that
it was a dangerous substance of no medical value. So dangerous in fact that all aspects of it were
made a criminal offence.
Over the
years however, increasing knowledge gained
has shown
(a)
That
it is not as dangerous a drug as was portrayed in the documents
(b)
That
it has distinct medical value.
Its use
has become so widespread and there
being no fundamental change in the law
it has been an
increasing cause of crime and social
upheavals in the various countries, which have attracted the attention of sections of the society all crying out for change in one way or
another.
What should Jamaica do?
The US was faced with a similar
situation in the early part of the last century. She had outlawed all aspects
of alcohol which subsequently became so widespread in use and was corrupting
all sections of the society that she was forced to change the law from that of
total prohibition to one of licensing and regulation. In the process she
converted alcohol from a revenue spender to a revenue earner. Can we do that with
marijuana? Of course we can. But to do
so on our own would put us in breach of our international obligations as the
Solicitor General has pointed out. And this we cannot afford. I would strongly advise the government
therefore to go back to the UN and ask for a new convention on drugs in general
and marijuana in particular, in the light of the new knowledge we now have.
Medical Use
Regarding
this aspect we could on our own call
on Canasol the glaucoma relieving eye drops developed
here by our own Professor Manley West and Dr
Albert Lockhart, and Asthmasol for its extensive use in Asthma a condition which is increasing worldwide.
To give evidence on our behalf we could call
on the California Medical Association, the Canadian, British and
Australian Medical Department, and the numerous states and oncology associations in
the US and elsewhere.
Dangerous Substance
Regarding its dangers we could on our own
quote the findings of the extensive work done at the University of the West
Indies by Rubin and Comitas and we could ask the Costa Rican Government for its
support as the findings of research done
there were similar to ours. We could
quote our own findings of the result of the Five- year Follow-up of Rural
Jamaican Children whose Mothers used Marijuana during
Pregnancy, published in the West Indian Journal Sept 1991.
We could also ask for the support of the World
Health Organization which has statistical evidence to show that of all the
drugs in common use some of which are “legal” and some “illegal”
tobacco
is the most dangerous of them all,
responsible for one death every 11 seconds throughout the world.
Marijuana on the other hand is now regarded in scientific circles as a “soft”
drug.
Human Right
We could also solicit the help of the human rights people who will argue that if is allowable
and the right of the individual to smoke cigarettes if he so wishes, why
is he denied that right with marijuana and being made a criminal if he does so.
Environmentalists
Finally we could petition this most active body to come to
our support. For
they know the whole history of why marijuana came to be in this situation. They
know of the genesis of the Marijuana Tax Act by which the US eventually outlawed the plant in
1937. This made it almost impossible for
paper to be made from hemp, a process which causes far less environmental
pollution than in making paper from wood pulp. And they would argue in their own inimitable
style that it is time to go back to making paper from cannabis, discontinue the
deforestation, reduce the incidence of acid rain and the pollution of our rivers and save our
planet earth which as they like to say is “not for sale”
Politics Diplomacy
and Timing
I can
think of no better time to approach the UN than now. For Jamaica will have the
backing of all those countries of the world including Britain, which have
changed or are in the process of changing their approach to the marijuana
problem. In
fact the major factors delaying progress in the so called “drug war” have been
dominance of the UN by the US, the
unreasonable intractability of the federal government, and differences between
state and federal law as regards marijuana Last year federal agents busted a
health clinic treating AIDS, CANCER and
other patients in California and carted them off to a federal institution..
Though this action was an embarrassment to the USA it was upheld by its Supreme court which maintained that federal law supersedes state law.
The recent “emasculation” of the UN by the US leading up to the Iraq war, the
fiscal and other problems associated with the post war situation and the
emergence of the European Union, and
have all created a situation for the US whereby she is now apparently
abandoning that
arrogant “ we will do
it alone” attitude and is pulling out all the stops in efforts
to make friends and demonstrate some form of world unity. With Britain definitely on our side in the
marijuana issue, and both Blair and Bush in the position in which they now
are, I anticipate a change in federal US also. She will also get some
silent under the counter lobbying from some of the cigarette companies for it
is an open secret that some are simply waiting for the day when marijuana will
be decriminalized and they will come out
on the market with an appropriate cigarette. It is even rumoured
that one has already taken out a patent on the word.
Strong Case
I
believe we have a strong case. In 1962
three months after we became an independent nation we impressed the
world by proposing to the UN the creation of an International Year of Human Rights Let us do it again by proposing radical
changes in the entire drug spectrum. Perhaps we should ask our Solicitor
General to prepare and present our case for us.