Did you know that teachers, knowingly or unwillingly, tell lies?
Well, just look at the:
 Lies My Psychology Professors Taught Me
 

******************************************************************
Jeff:
Interesting stuff! I suggest that you present these articles in an online newsletter entitled, e.g., Jeff's Corner. Consider inviting readers to contribute to a Letters to the Editor section. I suggest that you discuss this with Franz&Jutta. I think the Crew can help.
Regards.
Carl

*******************************************************************************

Eliah Dinur wrote:

             Lies My Psychology Professors Taught Me
 
 
 
 

  By Dave McGowan
  August 2000

  "[New] technologies are conditioning a growing segment of the society to regard all deviance as sickness and to accept
  increasingly narrow standards of acceptable behavior as scientifically normative ... Together the new programs and technologies
  are part of a burgeoning establishment involving welfare institutions, universities, hospitals, the drug industry, government at
  all levels, and organized psychiatry (itself in large part a creation of government) ... The ideal, in the view of the behaviorists, is
  the paranoid's dream, a method so smooth that no one will know his behavior is being manipulated and against which no
  resistance is therefore possible ... There is no longer a set of impositions which he can regard as unjust or capricious and against
  which he can dream of rebelling. To entertain such dreams would be madness. Gradually, even the ability to imagine
  alternatives begins to fade. This is, after all, not only the best of all possible worlds; it is the only one."
  Peter Schrag  Mind Control, Pantheon 1978

  I have a degree in psychology from UCLA. I don't know exactly where it is, though I'm sure it's safely filed away somewhere. It's
  not really worth much though. I don't mean that it doesn't have much value in the job market, though that is surely the case. No, it
  isn't worth much because it was awarded to me on the supposition that I had gained a substantial level of knowledge about the field
  of psychology, which in hindsight was clearly a faulty premise.
          It's not that I didn't try to learn. I actually did a very good job of regurgitating back the information that was presented to me,
  even graduating with honors. No, the problem was that - despite the exalted reputation of the UCLA psychology department - none
  of my professors seemed to be particularly interested in teaching me what psychology is really about.
          I have a much better understanding now, though I had to fill in many of the gaps in my education on my own. Doing so, by
  the way, took considerably less time than the four years I spent being spoon-fed pseudo-knowledge at college. Society doesn't place
  any value on the acquisition of such knowledge however, so I don't have any kind of degree for my post-college education.
  Nevertheless, I thought I'd pass along some of the information that I wasn't formally taught, for whatever it's worth.
          One thing I was taught was that John Watson is a much revered figure in the field of psychology, considered the father of
  'behaviorism.' Watson, who began his career in 1908 as a professor of psychology and the director of the psychological laboratory
  at Johns Hopkins University, was perhaps most notable for venturing into the field of infant study in 1918 - at the time a largely
  unexplored area of research. Watson conditioned a fear response in an infant identified only as 'Little Albert,' afterwards
  triumphantly declaring that "men are built, not born."
          Ten years later, Watson would pen what was at the time considered the bible of child-rearing, Psychological Care of Infant
  and Child, assuming the mantle that would later be worn by Dr. Spock. Unfortunately, there are a couple of elements of this story
  that seem to have been omitted from my textbooks, one of which is that Little Albert was not just some random infant; he was, in
  fact, the illegitimate son of the good doctor himself. And how did the reigning expert on childcare fare as a father? Not too well, it
  seems: Albert Watson was so traumatized by his upbringing at the hands of his father that he committed suicide shortly after
  reaching adulthood.
          Watson had long since left his position at Johns Hopkins amidst a nasty divorce from his first wife, presumably precipitated
  by her displeasure with the revelation that Watson's experiments had included impregnating his nurse and torturing their resultant
  offspring. In 1921, Watson had headed for Madison Avenue where he would put the behavior modification knowledge he had
  acquired by traumatizing infants to work on a society-wide level, ushering in the era of modern propaganda (oops, I meant to say
  advertising). Along the way, he would find U.S. intelligence services to be an excellent source of funding, as would all the
  characters in this sordid tale.
          Following closely in the footsteps of Dr. Watson was B.F. Skinner, the other revered figure in the behaviorist school of
  psychology. Skinner - who had received a defense grant during World War II to study the training of pigeons for use as part of an
  early missile guidance system (I don't just make this shit up) - invented what he termed the 'Air Crib' in 1945, which was essentially
  a sensory deprivation chamber built specifically for infants. Like Watson, he used his own child as a human guinea pig, raising her
  in the thermostatically controlled, sound-proof isolation chamber for the first two years of her life, cut off from human contact.
  Skinner ultimately followed a bit too closely in the footsteps of his mentor; Debby Skinner, like Albert Watson, committed suicide in
  her twenties.
          In 1948 Skinner joined the faculty of Harvard, putting him in the company of such luminaries as Dr. Martin Orne, the head of
  the Office of Naval Research’s Committee on Hypnosis and later a prominent member of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation.
  Skinner and Orne - as well as numerous others at Harvard, including Timothy Leary and Richard Alpert - received heavy funding
  from both the CIA and the U.S. Army. In 1971, Skinner published an unabashedly fascistic diatribe entitled Beyond Freedom and
  Dignity, advocating a dystopian society in which freedom and dignity were outmoded concepts. It earned him a cover story in Time
  magazine and the honor of having his work named the most important book of the year by the New York Times.
          Also on board at Harvard at the time was Dr. Henry Murray, overseeing the work of Leary's Psychedelic Drug Research
  Program and various other CIA-funded projects. So deified was this man during my years at UCLA that an entire undergraduate
  course focused almost exclusively on his supposedly brilliant work. Yet during that course, no mention was ever made of the fact
  that Murray was a fully owned asset of the intelligence community. Recruited during World War II by none other than "Wild Bill"
  Donovan, Murray was quickly put to work running the Personality Assessments section of the OSS, precursor to the CIA.
          Murray's best known contribution to the field of personality assessment - the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) - waas in
  fact developed as a tool of the U.S. military/intelligence complex. After the war, Murray would be one of the key players in the
  CIA's MK-ULTRA projects, studying various methods of achieving control of the human mind. One of his best research subjects
  during his days at Harvard was a young undergraduate by the name of Theodore Kaczynski.
          Perhaps even more revered than Murray was Dr. Louis Jolyon West, the head of the UCLA Psychiatry Department and the
  director of the prestigious UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute. Dr. West was another prominent participant in the MK-ULTRA
  program who would eventually wind up on the board of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation. His work with the
  military/intelligence community began at least as far back as 1958, when he conducted studies funded by the U.S. Air Force in
  surviving torture as a prisoner-of-war. If you're wondering how it is possible to study the conditioning of soldiers to survive torture
  without inflicting that very same torture in the process, the answer is simple: it isn't. A few years later, West achieved a moment of
  fame when he injected a beloved elephant at the Oklahoma City Zoo with a massive 300,00 microgram dose of LSD to observe how
  it would react; Tusko's reaction was to promptly drop dead.
          In 1964, West was called upon to evaluate the 'mental state' of a man by the name of Jack Ruby, at the time being held
  pending trial for the murder of Lee Harvey Oswald. West quickly determined that Ruby was delusional, based on his obviously
  absurd belief that there was some sort of fascist conspiracy behind the assassination of President Kennedy. Dr. Jolly, as he was
  known to colleagues, ordered Ruby drugged with 'happy pills.' Ruby subsequently died of cancer, which he maintained he had been
  deliberately infected with. Having finished up that assignment, the doctor soon after found himself a crash-pad in the Haight where
  he could 'observe' the acid subculture in its native environment by drugging unwitting 'subjects.'
          West is probably most notorious for proposing in 1972 to then California Governor Ronald Reagan the creation of a Center for
  the Study and Reduction of Violence, to be built on a remote abandoned missile test site in the Santa Monica Mountains. Among his
  earliest recruits were Leonard Rubenstein, formerly a top aide to Dr. David Ewen Cameron, as well as two South American doctors
  who had also worked for Cameron - one to run the shock room and the other to run the psychosurgery suite. At the time, the two
  were employed at 'detention centers' in Paraguay and Chile, which is a nice way of saying that they were working at
  torture/interrogation centers run by Nazi exile communities (many of which - including the notorious Colonia Dignidad in Chile -
  still exist to this day).
          Also recruited by West was Dr. Frank Ervin, one of a trio of Harvard psychosurgeons who had not long before proposed
  lobotomy as the solution to urban 'rioting'. The center was to work in conjunction with California law enforcement and had secured
  large grants from the U.S. Law Enforcement Assistance Administration and the National Institute of Mental Health. These two
  organizations had forged a close alliance in 1970 with the encouragement of the Nixon Administration, with both of them heavily
  involved in funding MK-ULTRA projects. There were to be psychologists, physicians and sociologists on board - mostly recruited
  from among West's disciples at the Neuropsychiatric Institute (some of whom would later be my professors) - as well as lawyers,
  police officers, probation officers and clergymen.
          The goal of the center was to identify 'predelinquents' and treat them before their 'deviance' and supposed propensity for
  violence could be manifest. The team believed that predelinquents could be identified on the basis of several factors: socioeconomic
  status (poor), age (young), ethnicity (black), and sex (males). Treatments under consideration included electroshock, chemical
  castration, experimental drug therapy, and psychosurgery - better known as lobotomy (the 'surgical' destruction of the frontal lobes
  of the brain).
          Lobotomy, as was mentioned in a previous article, was developed in fascist Portugal in 1935 by Dr. Egaz Moniz as a tool of
  social control. It was introduced to America the following year by James Watts and Walter Freeman, the latter of whom would later
  boast of having personally performed over 4,000 lobotomies in the United States, for all of the following 'conditions': apprehension,
  anxiety, depression, compulsions, obsessions, drug addiction, and sexual deviance. By the post-war years, lobotomy was big
  business, warmly embraced by the Veteran's Administration and heartily recommended for vets suffering from combat-related
  'disorders.'
          Moniz's procedure did not prove too popular with his patients however. In 1939 he was shot and partially paralyzed by a
  former patient. Sixteen years later, another former patient would finish the job, beating Nobel laureate Moniz to death.
  Electro-convulsive therapy was likewise an import from fascist Europe, developed by Ugo Cerletti in Italy in 1938. Appropriately
  enough, this 'medical advance' was based on Cerletti's observation of cattle being jolted into submission as they were being led to
  slaughter. Another form of shock therapy - insulin shock - was introduced by Sakel iin fascist Austria just a few years earlier.
          One name that never came up in my years at UCLA was that of the aforementioned Dr. David Ewen Cameron. Considering
  that Cameron is probably the most honored North American psychiatrist of the last half-century, this appears in retrospect a rather
  remarkable omission. During his career, Cameron would found the Canadian Mental Health Association and serve as chairman of
  the Canadian Scientific Planning Committee, president of the American Psychiatric Association, president of the Canadian
  Psychiatric Association, and the first president of the World Association of Psychiatrists. He was also the psychiatrist most
  thoroughly co-opted by U.S. intelligence services in all of North America.
          His intelligence career began at least as early as 1941, when he was sent by Allen Dulles to England on behalf of the OSS to
  'ascertain the state of mind' of Rudolph Hess, Hitler's right-hand man who had supposedly 'defected' to the U.K.. Cameron was
  during this time a member of the Military Mobilization Committee of the American Psychiatric Association where he also worked
  closely with Dulles. By 1943, Cameron had founded the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal with a generous grant from (where
  else?) the Rockefeller Foundation. The institute would continue to receive lavish support from the Rockefellers for at least the next
  decade, as well as the generous support of the CIA through various funding conduits.
          In 1946, Cameron helped craft the Nuremberg Code on medical research, setting ethical guidelines for human research that
  were perhaps nowhere more flagrantly ignored than at his own Institute. Cameron's MK-ULTRA operation conducted what were
  undoubtedly among the most appalling of the CIA funded mind control experiments (those that are well documented, anyway),
  utilizing what he euphemistically termed 'depatterning' and 'psychic driving.'
          During the depatterning phase, the objective was to completely obliterate the existing personality. This was done by restraining
  the victims (oops, I meant patients) for weeks on end and subjecting them to massive doses of drugs and repeated electroshock
  treatments. Cameron preferred the Page-Russell electroshock technique - controversial even among the shock docs of the time -
  which employed six consecutive shocks rather than just one big jolt. This wasn't quite enough for Cameron though, so he cranked
  up the power to as much as twenty times the normal strength, and administered the 'treatment' two or three times a day.
  Concurrently given three times a day were drug cocktails containing every combination of incapacitating and mind-altering drug
  imaginable.
          Following some two months of this medical torture, patients were then subjected to psychic driving, during which they were
  again incapacitated by drugs - including curare, a paralyzing agent which can be lethal - while taped messages were played
  continuously through speakers placed in pillows or in helmets the unfortunate victims were forced to wear. This also went on for
  weeks on end, with the subjects remaining drug-addled throughout the process. Cameron experimented with other techniques as
  well, including psychosurgery and the extensive use of LSD; one woman was kept locked in a small box for thirty-five consecutive
  days.
          In 1960, Cameron was asked by Allen Dulles to evaluate the mental state of U-2 pilot Francis Gary Powers upon his return
  from the Soviet Union. So impressed was Dulles with Cameron’s assessment of Powers that he next had him draft a psychological
  profile of Patrice Lumumba - the first Prime Minister of the newly independent Congo - to determine what the most efficient means
  of assassinating him might be. Premier spymaster William Buckley took the agency’s file on Lumumba to Montreal for Cameron's
  review; by January of the following year, Lumumba was dead, his body dissolved in acid after enduring a month of barbaric
  torture. As for Buckley, he would later be present at both the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul and the successful
  assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, whose security forces he had personally trained.
          Working with Cameron on his experiments - some of which are believed by some researchers to have been terminal - were
  Leonard Rubenstein, an Englishman and former member of the British Army’s Royal Signal Core, and Jan Zielinski, a Polish-born
  engineer who knew only limited English and rarely spoke. These two built a 'grid room' and an isolation chamber in the basement of
  Allan Memorial and were given unlimited access to patients, despite the fact that neither had any formal medical training or
  qualifications. Also on board was Dr. Hassam Azima - rumored to be a blood relative of the U.S.-installed Shah of Iran - and Dr.
  Wilder Penfield, a prominent neurologist.
          Penfield was one of the pioneers in the field of electromagnetic control of the brain in the 1960's. Most prominent in this area
  of research was Dr. Jose M.R. Delgado, who made the front page of the New York Times when one of his remote controlled brain
  implants stopped a charging bull dead in its tracks. Delgado - who brought his ideas here from fascist Spain and was heavily funded
  by the CIA - was an open advocate of a psychologically controlled totalitarian society. Probably nowhere can the true nature of
  psychology be better discerned than from the words of this Dr. Strangelove.
          In his Orwellian titled book, Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society, Delgado wrote that "the
  integration of neurophysiological and psychological principles [would lead] to a more intelligent education, starting from the moment
  of birth and continuing throughout life, with the preconceived plan of escaping from the blind forces of chance and of influencing
  cerebral mechanisms and mental structure in order to create a future man with greater personal freedom and originality, a member
  of a psychocivilized society, happier, less destructive, and better balanced than present man."
          He supported the mass drugging of America with "tranquilizers, energizers, and other psychoactive drugs," which he claimed
  were "highly beneficial both for patients and for relatively normal persons who need pharmacological help to cope with the
  pressures of civilized life." Lobotomy was proposed as the answer to crime: "the possibility of surgical rehabilitation of criminals has
  been considered by several scientists as more humane, more promising, and less damaging for the individual than his incarceration
  for life."
          Delgado also made the rather remarkable observation that: "In some old plantations slaves behaved very well, worked hard,
  were submissive to their masters, and were probably happier than some of the free blacks in modern ghettos." Ahh, the good old
  days. Delgado next noted that: "In several dictatorial countries the general population is skillful, productive, well behaved, and
  perhaps as happy as those in more democratic societies."
          Five years after penning his manifesto, Delgado appeared before the U.S. Congress and proclaimed: "We need a program of
  psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the
  given norm can be surgically mutilated ... The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is
  only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective ... Man does not have the right to develop his own mind." Such
  talk earned Delgado funding from the Office of Naval Research, the Air Force Aero-Medical Research Laboratory, and the Public
  Health Foundation of Boston.

  What has been covered here barely scratches the surface of the lies and omissions that characterized my education in the field of
  psychology. There is considerably more that could be said on the subject. I could mention, for instance, that two of the most
  widely referenced psychological studies - Philip Zimbardo's Stanford Prison experimment and Stanley Milgram's obedience studies -
  were funded by, and performed at the request of, U.S. military and intelligence services.
          I could also mention that the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) - created in 1946 by the congressional Natiional
  Mental Health Act - was borne of the combined efforts of Robert H. Felix (head of the military's Division of Mental Hygiene during
  World War II), General Lewis Hershey (director of the Selective Service System), and the chief psychiatrists of the Army and the
  Navy. In fact, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - the bible of modern psychiatry - was also an invention
  of the military/intelligence complex, developed during World War II by Brigadier General William Menninger to codify 'deviant'
  behavior, and later institutionalized by the APA.
          And of course I would be remiss were I not to note that the twin pillars of psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung,
  were both fascist sympathizers. In 1933 - the year that Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party ascended to power - Germany’s influential
  Journal of Psychotherapy published an article by Dr. M.H. Goering, a cousin of Hermann Goering, urging psychotherapists to make
  "a serious scientific study of Adolf Hitler’s fundamental work Mein Kampf, and to recognize it as a basic work." The editor of the
  journal openly calling for the Nazification of psychotherapy was Dr. Carl Gustav Jung.
          Sigmund Freud had close ties to the Reich as well, particularly to a man named George Viereck - the illegitimate grandson of
  the Kaiser who had ties to SS Reichsfuhrer Heinrich Himmler and was perhaps the most avid supporter of Nazism in America.
  Viereck ran an extensive pro-Hitler propaganda operation that included having a U.S. Senator on his payroll - Ernest Lundeen from
  Minnesota - whose hastily scheduled flight out of Washington following the revelation of his connection to Viereck conveniently
  crashed on August 31, 1940, as such flights are prone to do.
          In 1926, Viereck interviewed Freud - whom he had known for many years - on the subject of anti-Semitism, and in 1930
  published that interview in a collection entitled Glimpses of the Great. Freud would later state that: "I can highly recommend the
  Gestapo to everyone." And since wherever Nazis congregate, U.S. intelligence is never far away, it's not surprising that Freud had
  impressive connections to the OSS 'Old Boys' network as well. Particularly close was William Bullit, one of the driving forces
  behind the OSS, who spent several months working with Freud in Vienna.
          What then is this thing we call 'psychology'? Put in the simplest possible terms, it is just another appendage of the national
  security apparatus to attain social control and enforce conformity to the fascist state. It in fact is nearly indistinguishable from the
  American criminal justice/penal system. There is at least one major difference though - the psychiatrist is allowed to serve as
  prosecutor, judge and jury in seeking the involuntary confinement of 'deviants' in mental institutions that are indiscernible in form
  and function from America's rapidly growing prison complex.
          The harsh reality is that psychology has little to do with bettering the human condition and alleviating suffering, and everything
  to do with lending legitimacy to the corporate capitalist state and justifying as individual failings the ever increasing levels of
  suffering inflicted by the state onto society. As Frederick Winslow Taylor - the exalted father of 'scientific management,' an early
  euphemism for the deskilling of labor and the reduction of the American labor force to interchangeable, easily exploited automatons
  - so succinctly stated many decades ago: "in the past the man had been first; in the future the system must be first."
          Not long ago, my teenage daughter asked me why it was that so many people she has met in her life suffer from low
  self-esteem. Why indeed? The answer, it turns out, is quite simple: we are all victims of one of the big lies of American society - the
  one that says that if we educate ourselves, work hard and apply our talents, there is absolutely nothing we cannot achieve. We are
  taught from birth that anyone in this great country can rise up to the highest strata of society if we so choose, that if we have the
  drive and ability, nothing can hold us back. George W. Bush articulated this very message from the campaign trail recently when he
  said: "One of the wonderful things about America is, it doesn't matter who you are or where you're from. If you work hard, dream
  big, the notion of owning your own business applies to everybody."
          Conversely, if we should fail we have no one but ourselves to blame, for we must not be smart enough, talented enough, or
  educated enough - or we just didn't try hard enough. The brutal reality though is that in the real world, the sons of the rich and
  powerful will assume their fathers' seats in the boardrooms of America regardless of their qualifications (George, Jr. being a prime
  example), while the most talented of kids from America's 'inner cities' will live and die without ever seeing the world beyond the
  confines of their neighborhoods.
          That is the reality for the majority of Americans. And yet we are encouraged, in fact required, to set goals for ourselves that
  are impossible to attain, to buy into the Big Lie. When we inevitably fail to achieve these goals, which the social structure has
  deliberately put out of our reach, we are required to blame only ourselves. The system has not failed you, you have failed because
  you are a fucking loser. You're too fucking lazy to succeed. You're too fucking stupid to succeed. So stop looking for scapegoats
  and accept the fact that you determine your own fate.
          That is what the system would have you believe. And it is, in the final analysis, the psychologist's primary job to reinforce that
  message. That is why it is that the nation that heralds itself as the truest form of 'democracy' is home to more psychiatrists,
  psychologists, therapists, counselors, social workers, and psychic friends than any nation in the world. Not coincidentally, that
  same nation is also home to the world's largest penal system. That, apparently, is the price we pay for 'freedom' in this country, a
  peculiar kind of freedom that does not include the right to engage in any sort of 'deviant' behavior.
          Freedom of that type, it seems, could conceivably pose a threat to the powers that be, lest too many people begin to question
  the 'right' of the wealthy and powerful to maintain their positions at the top of the food chain at the expense of the psychologically
  enslaved masses whose labors serve to fatten their investment portfolios. Better that we remain, in the words of George Orwell, in a
  state of "controlled insanity," for nothing could pose a greater threat to the system than a sane population fighting for survival in an
  insane world. ------------------------------------
  Make Unlimited phone calls from your PC to ANY phone in the World!
  http://www.eboom.com/free/
**********************************************************************************