Running Head: UNDERSTANDING MODEL AND CONCEPT ATTAINMENT STRATEGY
Course 6630: Instructional Models and Strategies,
Week
Three Application: The Understanding
Model and Concept Attainment Strategy
APP3Mscally (50 points)
Michael Patrick Scally
http://www.M_Scally@Hotmail.com
March 18, 2006
Dr. Trudy Driskell
|
Week 3: The Understanding Model
and Concept Attainment Strategy - Application |
|
|
|
|
|
JavaScript is required for your course. Please ensure
JavaScript is enabled in your browser preferences.
Application: Concept Attainment Lesson
Step One: Introduction
The acquisition of new concepts can be difficult for students and is best taught in an active learning situation. In the Concept Attainment strategy, students formulate concepts by making decisions about what attributes belong in certain categories. Select a concept that you have had difficulty teaching in the past and consider ways to teach that concept more effectively using this strategy. Use the content from Video Programs Five and Six and the Required Reading to inform your response.
Step Two: Individual Response
Develop a lesson using the Concept Attainment strategy according to the following criteria:
When complete, save the assignment as APP3+your first
initial+last name. For example, Sally Ride's assignment would read
"APP3SRide". Submit this assignment via the Dropbox. Use the "Submit an Assignment" link,
choose the Week 3: Application basket, then add your
Application as an attachment.
Dr. Harvey Silver has done a remarkable
job of presenting the Concept Attainment Strategy (Canter & Associates,
1996), as he has all the teaching strategies in this course (Videos Five and
Six). It may be said that he has in fact done too good of a job explaining this
strategy as he has made it seem much easier to teach this strategy than it is
to do it yourself. A case in point is that I thought I would use the concept of
democracy for this assignment. It was only after I had thought a great deal
about all of the possible types of government and existing examples for each
that the students might know, that I decided to choose another concept. It was
then that I saw in our text (Silver, et al, 1996), “Identifying the critical or
essential attributes in abstract or complex concepts such as culture,
democracy, and leadership, however, may be quite difficult.” I have found this
to be a very true statement. I then searched my memory for other concepts that
I had previously had difficulty teaching. The difficult part of this chore, I
am embarrassed to say, is that I seem to have had many concepts that I found
difficult to teach to my students. The one I have chosen, however, is about
literary devices.
When I began teaching fourteen years ago I was fortunate enough to teach junior high language arts. I was even more fortunate to take possession of an eighth grade class composed mainly of very smart and very opinionated girls. While speaking to other teachers I learned that these girls had run or attempted to run their classrooms for many years. Every former teacher, it seemed, had a large collection of anecdotes about this class, but for some reason, did not want to share them with me. Instead they would smile, wish me good luck, and go back to their own work. It was during my first two weeks of teaching that I remembered something one of my college professors had told us. She said, “Just because you are the teacher and the only adult, don’t assume you are the smartest one in the room.” Her adage was true when she said it, it was once again true, I determined, as I looked out upon that eighth grade class, very true. These not so fond memories somehow reminded me of my first literary devices lessons.
I hope to once again teach Language Arts in the coming year, so for the purposes of this assignment and my future in teaching, I looked up the Montana content standard that applies to literary devices. Reading Content Standard 2 - Students apply a range of skills and strategies to read. The rationale for this standard is: Readers use a variety of strategies to construct meaning. Some of these strategies include phonics, grammatical structure, use of context clues, and self-monitoring. The student reads fluently by adjusting rate according o purpose, material, and understanding. Varied experiences with literature develop a rich vocabulary for lifelong learning and an understanding of the elements of fiction and nonfiction. More specifically,
Benchmark 8.3
applies. It reads, “Identify and compare literary devices 3. Identify, analyze,
and evaluate the language and exaggeration). (e.g., figurative language,
exaggeration, use of literary devices (e.g., irony, humor, dialogue).” As it
would take up too much space for this assignment (and the fact that I have not
been a masochist for almost fourteen years), I have chosen to use only one
literary device concept for this activity. The literary device (I hope you will
notice) is humor.
According to my
dictionary (Guralnik, 1984) there are many definitions for humor, however, the
most appropriate one for this instance
is, “4. the quality that makes something seem funny, amusing, or ludicrous;
comicality (Page 684). Online searching found the following (Dictionary.com,
2006): “humor n 1: a message whose ingenuity or verbal
skill or incongruity has the power to evoke laughter [syn: wit, humour, witticism, wittiness] 2: the
trait of appreciating (and being able to express) the humorous; "she
didn't appreciate my humor"; "you can't survive in the army without a
sense of humor" [syn: humour, sense of
humor, sense of
humour] 3: a characteristic (habitual or relatively temporary) state of
feeling; "whether he praised or cursed me depended on his temper at the time";
\"he was in a bad humor" [syn: temper, mood, humour] 4: the quality
of being funny; "I fail to see the humor in it" [syn: humour].
I would begin
this concept attainment strategy by explaining the objective of the lesson (for
students to know and understand what constitutes humor as a literary device and
how to use humor in their writing). I would then help them to further
understand the concept of humor used as a literary device by using the
following anticipatory hooks, jokes that need punch lines:
1. What do you call a tax on people who are bad
at math? Answer: the lottery.
2. Where do dogs go when they lose their tails?
Answer: the retail store.
3. Steven Wright One Liner of the Day: I
bought a house, on a one-way dead-end road. I don't know how I got there.
Then,
as always happens when school kids hear jokes, they want to tell their
favorites. We would then listen to several examples of humorous jokes and those
not humorous. (I would also give them the following background knowledge:
[HUMOUR (Glossary, 2006) - In a comprehensive modern theory of laughter and
humour, philosopher John Morreall proposes that "laughter results from a
pleasant psychological shift." This theory embraces the three classical
theories of humour: a) the Superiority
Theory found in Plato, Aristotle, and Hobbes, in which we laugh
at the misfortunes of others, which thus reflect our own superiority; b) the Incongruity Theory, of Kant and
Schopenhauer, in which we laugh at something that violates our expectations; c)
the Relief Theory, of
Herbert Spencer, John Dewey, and Sigmund Freud, in which we laugh to relieve
nervous energy (The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor 128-138). See also
Chapter 1 of Victor Raskin's Semantic Mechanisms of Humor.] I would, however,
need to be careful hear to warn the students that inappropriate jokes would not
be tolerated and then follow-up with consequences if they tell one. I would
have them pair up to tell one another their jokes for five minutes. We would
then regroup as an entire class, ask for jokes to be told to the entire class,
and I would write the attributes of each joke. Those jokes that were funny and
had merit would go into the “Yes” column on the board while those unfunny jokes
would go into the “No” column on the board. We would discuss the attributes of
each joke at length and compare the characteristics shared by those attributes
in the “Yes” column. I would then write down the characteristics common to the
“Yes” column jokes.
Then,
after comparing and contrasting the essential attributes of humor as a class,
we would make a list of these attributes. The students would again pair up to
generate hypotheses for ten minutes. After ten minutes I would call them all
together once again to discuss their hypotheses and to discuss them and to come
to an agreement on one hypothesis. The students would then compose a their
definition of the concept of humor as a literary device.
During
the next class period the students would use their definition of humor to try
to begin using the literary device in a writing assignment. I would assign a
topic they might find interesting at the time, for example, something to do
with basketball, and ask them to compose a short story. They would not have to
use a great deal of humor in their stories, but they would have to identify
when they did use humor by printing their humor in red ink. I believe this
could be a very fun activity for all involved to do in order to teach and learn
a difficult concept – humor as a literary device.
References
Dictionary.com (2006). lexico publishing group, LLC. retrieved march 17, 2006, at http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=humor.
Glossary of terms. (2006). Retrieved March 18, 2006, from http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&rls=RNWG%2CRNWG%3A2005-44%2CRNWG%3Aen&q=teaching+literary+devices+%2Bhumor .
Guralnik, David B. (Ed.). (1984). Webster’s new world dictionary of the american language (second college edition. deluxe color edition.) Cleveland: simon and Schuster.
Montana Social Studies Content Standards.2000. Retrieved March 9, 2006 from http://www.oocities.org/mkscally/SSConStandards.pdf
Silver, H. F., Hanson, J. R., Strong, R. W.,
& Schwartz, P. B. (1996). Teaching styles & strategies.
Trenton, NJ: The Thoughtful Education Press.