Ecuadorīs Indians Show Their Clout
In Win over Fuel Price Adjustments

      
    By Ronald J. Morgan

   QUITO, Ecuador -- President Gustavo Naboaīs roll
back of basic fuel prices following 10 days of
Indigenous protests here, has reasserted the role of
Ecuadorīs Indians as the final arbiter in the nationīs
politics.
   The protests which left four dead, and dozens
injuried, lead to a reduction in cooking gas prices
from $2 to $1.50 per 15 kilo tank, and  a freezing of
the price of premium gasoline and diesel for one year.
Senior citizens and students are to receive discounts
on public transportation rates.
   Twenty-five percent of Ecuador's 12.4 million
population is indigenous,mainly Quichua. Most Indians
subsist on an average of $2 per
day.
  Anger over government plans to reinstate use of
kerosene fuel for the poor and the extent of the
January
hikes -- a 100% increase in cooking gas, a
25% jump in gasoline prices and bus fare increases of
75% -- caused unprecedented numbers of
indigenous women to join the January 26 uprising
called by Antonio Vargas, head of the Confederation of
Indigenous
Nationalities of Ecuador. Most brought along
their children in what became a broad-based family
effort that paralyzed indigenous regions of the
country.
   "We woman are the people who understand the
economic costs because we do the shopping, we take
care of the education. Weīre involved in all the
economic questions. For that reason we had to become
more active," said Susana Pupiales,a Quichua indian,
as she awaited protest
duties earlier this week at the Salesian Politechnical
University of Quito.
   The Feb. 8 agreement, which followed  an initial
government strategy of police repression and
implemenation of a national state of emergency,
committed the goverment to 23 actions. Some of the
items are to be hammered out in five seperate
negotiating groups to be established within 30 days.
    In addition to the price reductions, the agreement
increases soft credits to medium, small and
microbusinesses, and commits the government to
increase financing of indigenous development and
health funds.
    Foreign debt swaps for conservation and
development projects are to be promoted by the
government and targeted at Ecuadorīs poorest regions.
    The government also committed itself to
decentralization and resolution of pending land
disputes.
    The indigenous organizations have been
particularly critical of the governmentīs use of
government funds to rescue and restructure the banking
system. They feel the poor are baring the brunt of the
cost through price hikes and increased taxes.
    The 1999 banking collapse lead to goverment
intervention in 14 financial institutions. The IMF
estimates the eventual cost to the government will be
$2.7 billion. The government has committed itself to
negotiaitons on strategies to retrieve bank funds
removed from the country by ex-bankers and recover bad
loans issued by the failed banks intervened by the
government.
    The government will also negotiate with the
indigenous on the operation of the customs service,
which they say could raise more tax revenue if it were
operated by the Internal Tax Service.
    Plan Colombia will also be a subject of
negotiation. The agreement signed this week calls for
Ecuador to "not allow the regionalization of Plan
Colombia nor involve the country in a foreign
conflict."
   Ecuadorīs Indigenous groups also oppose the
presence of the U.S. Foreward Operations Base at
Manta.
    The agreement is being viewed as a setback to the
IMF conceived economic strategy which accompanied a
$304 million standby financing agreement.
Dollarization was successfully implemented in 2000 and
inflation has begun to tack down from 91% in December.
    But sharp tax and price increases are considered crucial to
returning Ecuador to fiscal health following economic
collapse and default on some foreign debt in 1999.
Some of the IMF-designed economic and investment
reforms had already been struck down as
unconstitutional in December. And a tax reform
proposal may have trouble passing congress.
    The indigenous say their victory should awaken
the IMF to the need to take their views into
consideration. "They put strong economic measures into
place without understanding our serious problems,"
said Miguel Perez, Congressional Deputy from Cotopaxi
and a member of the Indigenous Pachatukik Party. "Itīs
not just the economic problems.
There are social problems. There are problems with
immigrants. Until we solve those problems we canīt
comply with their demands."
   Despite some internal disputes Ecuadorīs indigenous
movement has been steadily gaining in political
experience and power.
   Indigenous organizations have helped oust two
presidents: Abdala Bucaram (1996-1997) and Jamil
Mahuad
(1998-2000). They
briefly reached the parapets of power on January 21,
2000 as part of a populist junta in a military-backed
coup that was rolled back
under U.S. pressure. In May elections indigenous
candidates made
strong gains, winning 19 city governments and five
governorships.
   Simon Pachano, a political analyst at the Latin
American Faculty of Social Sciences, says the
agreement consolidates the power of the indigenous but
also puts off inevitable economic adjustments.
   "I think theyīre going to win as a political force.
But they are also going to lose because backing down
on the economic measures is not desireable for the
country as a whole. It unravels the economic strategy
and there will have to be another adjustment at a
later time. In a sense its a very temporary victory.
But obviously they are now positioned as a sector that
can obtain what it demands."
Naboa Administration misread power
of Indigenous protests.