THE WRITERS' ROOM
The
Writing Center at Inman Middle School
Scoring Rubric
for Sixth Grade Language Arts Expository Essay
Holistic Score |
Skills Demonstrated |
Letter Grade |
5.4-6.0 |
· The response is fully
developed and engaging. It indicates
an excellent understanding of the requirements,
achieves all the
goals of the task, and demonstrates reflective thinking. · Accurate, relevant
information selected from the text supports facts and interpretations. · The response displays
exceptional use of the conventions of language and is likely to be error free. Errors in mechanics, usage, and
spelling are extremely rare and do not
interfere with communication. |
A |
4.8-5.3 |
· The response demonstrates
an understanding of the requirements, but is not as engaging or developed. Includes literal, accurate details of
all the goals of the task with partial
evidence of interpretative reasoning. · Accurate, relevant
information is selected from the text and offers some interpretation of its importance. · Demonstrates successful
use of the conventions of language, but may contain a few errors in mechanics,
usage, or spelling. If present
they are relatively minor and do not
interfere with communication. |
B |
4.5-4.7 |
· The response demonstrates
a fair understanding of some of the requirements but does not develop
them. · Information provided not
very selective. Too many or too few unsupported details are provided
with minimal reasoning. Tends to be flat, disorganized and unsupported. · Demonstrates a reasonable
use of the conventions of language, but contains some errors in mechanic,
usage, or spelling. Most errors are minor, but a few may be
serious. Most do not interfere with communication. |
C |
4.2-4.4 |
· The response tends to list
some of the requirements of the task.
Demonstrates a minimal understanding
of some of the goals. · Not very selective or
relevant information provided. Does not move beyond retelling information. Offers little interpretation. Serious problems with the organization. · Demonstrates marginally
successful use of the conventions of language. Patterns of errors in mechanics,
usage, or spelling are evident.
Several are serious and disrupt the meaning
of the response. |
D |
4.0-4.1 |
·
The response
is brief and does inadequately addresses some of the requirements or the goals of the
task. ·
The
information provided is not relevant or organized. ·
Very limited
ability to use the conventions of language.
Errors in mechanics, usage, or spelling are
frequent and serious making the response difficult to read and
interpret. |
F |
3 and below |
·
The response
is not on task. The goals of the task
are not present. ·
The
information provided is inadequate. ·
Demonstrates
great difficulty in applying the conventions of language. Frequent and serious errors may make
the response incomprehensible. |
U |