con't. from page 1C
In addition to the professionalism and clean set, the production succeeded in becoming a piece of art both separate and a part of Shakespeare’s original work. The very crispness of the set and professionalism of the actors showcased the piece, allowing audience members to focus on the dialogue instead of showy scenery. In addition, the expert and impassioned delivery of the lines added artistry to the work - often absent when the play is simply read aloud or performed in a more formal manner. Charlie Flynn-McIver, in his performance of Hamlet, was especially able deliver the eloquent words of Shakespeare in such a manner that it expressed emotion and sounded “real” without losing the beauty of the work. Also notable was Kermit Brown’s portrayal of the gravedigger. Despite the loftiness of the language, Brown was able to use larger-than-life gestures and accent to bring his earthy character to life while maintaining the integrity of the production and the piece. Once a piece is proven to have artistic merit, it can still fail to transcend historical context. The Christian Bible is a great example of a piece that has trouble with this, as those studying it find it difficult to differentiate between cultural and historical practices and things that are meant to apply to everyone at all times. NCSC’s production, in addition to having artistic merit, also transcends historical context in costuming, props, set, themes, and line delivery. Where most productions call for the actors to dress in Shakespearean costume and carry a sword (often a rapier), NCSC’s production was quite different. The actors dressed modernly (Hamlet in the traditional black) in suits, khakis, and floral print. Instead of swords, they carried guns and cell phones and fought with fencing foils. Plastic sheeting, metal chairs, and concrete blocks were used, adding to the modernity. => |