Circumstantial Evidence Linking Law Enforcement to the Incest and
Pedophile Community
    Hard, substantive evidence is difficult to uncover and will probably never be obtained until federal authorities begin investigations into the subculture, but circumstantial evidence linking law enforcement to the subculture abounds. First, the inaction of local authorities speaks volumns when one considers the seriousness of the crimes being accused to have been committed by subculture members. Inaction allows the subculture to continue, even if inaction is not intended to deliberately protect and promote the subculture and its activities. Second, the person-to-person level associations between authorities and members of the subculture also raises suspicions. These close relationships may be coincidental, but they may also be purposeful.The following are a few of the inactions and associations that should be investigated further.
     First, the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation special agent with responsibility for internet crimes and crimes against children, and his supervisor at the time, met with this researcher in October 2001 at SBI offices in Grensboro, NC. After an hour presentation by this researcher, the special agent declared that he already knew about this subculture and did not need additional information. He also threatened to jail this researcher if the researcher built a file of evidence on members of the subculture. Since that meeting, the special agent has refused to answer telephone or e-mail requests for information on the progress of his investigation. In Summer 2002, a new supervisor was assigned to this special agent. The supervisor said that the special agent did not include investigations of an incest/pedophile subculture in his workload briefing to the new supervisor. The special agent continues to fail to return calls and messages. In Fall 2001 an investigative reporter for the Greensboro newspaper uncovered evidence of nearly a hundred minor females either prostituting themselves or being prostituted by their parents in the Greensboro/Highpoint area and discovered that this activity was ongoing over the course of several years; he also found local law enforcement authorities claiming they knew nothing about these activities.
     Second, Jerry Lee Grant, also known on the internet as Jerry Morgan, a self-professed member of the incest/pedophile subculture and child sex slave trader, discussed the BDSM clubs in Pennsylvania, Delaware and Maryland with this researcher in a messenger conversation in early 2001. In that conversation he expressed dismay that none of the existing clubs were really interested in the activities in which he was interested. He then said that a Domme from York, PA was about to open a club in the York/Lancaster area that would more likely serve his interests. That club was subsequently opened in downtown York, PA. The Domme provides, among other things, high-priced professional services to infantilists-- adult men who want to poop in their diapers, be tended by babysitters, and have play parties with their little friends, both imaginary and real. Research from Canada indicates that many child sexual offenders are merely seeking sex partners who are at the same level of sexual development as the offender. Infantilists would clearly be at an age two to elementary school level of development and would seek playmates of a similar age. Jerry Grant/Morgan would be a likely provider of child playmates if the Domme's services included access to children. It was subsequently determined that police in Cumberland County and Lancaster County had relationships with this Domme. Those relationships were at such a level that, in official documents-- warrents and court testimony-- there have been efforts to obscure the address of her business and to withhold her name. There appears to be an effort to protect her business.
     Third, since attempts to provide information to law enforcement through direct means were ignored, this researcher attempted to feed information to undercover law enforcement through indirect means. In a series of e-mail and messenger conversations in Spring/Summer 2001, information on the incest/pedophile subculture was given to an investigator for the PA Attorney General's office who was promoting himself as an incest and pedophile photographer from Harrisburg, PA and to a Delaware County, PA police investigator promoting herself as a teenager. The Attorney General investigator would not break out of his persona and failed to act on information given to him. At one point he became angry when this investigator tried to give him information on incest and pedophile behavior patterns that failed to match his notion of how these offenders operate. Was he merely angry that someone was trying to tell him how to become a more convincing fake or was he concerned that this researcher knew about the subculture, and the investigators's possible involvement with it, and needed to break off communications to prevent his own exposure? Jerry Ray Grant/Morgan indicated several times from Fall 2000 through Summer 2001 that he had his enforcers in law enforcer that helped him, Jerry, to remove unwanted subculture members and unworthy or untrustworthy aspirants to subculture membership. In Spring 2001, in obvious frustration at this researcher's failure to progress in the interview process by kidnapping and raping a child in his presence, Jerry Grant/Morgan suddenly changed the interview requirements to merely being photographed having sex with a child. This was the very service being offered by the Attorney General's investigator. Either the AG investigator was operating in cooperation wth Jerry Grant/Morgan as his enforcer, or Jerry Grant/Morgan had found a way to use the investigator to further Jerry Grant/Morgan's own agenda. News accounts of the investigator's entrapment succeses led this researcher to request the aid of a Lancaster Newspaper Inc. reporter who was writing on the AG investigator's successes in investigating a possible link between Jerry Grant/Morgan and the AG's office. The reporter refused the request. This investigator attempted to get the Delaware County policewoman to give up her teenage persona and accept information directly related to Jerry Grant/Morgan, who was, at the time, alleged to be operating within either Delaware or Chester County, PA. Information was sent, first, by e-mail, then directly to her at her messenger persona. She refused to accept the information and threatened harassment charges if this researcher continued to send her information on Jerry Grant/Morgan. This research suspects that she was refusing to accept information so she could avoid a professional obligation to investigate the information.
    Fourth, attempts to involve the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Burlington, NC police, Dana's neighborhood police, in researching the subculture are discussed elsewhere in this paper. In addition, other local police departments were sent letters, hoping to prompt a response and begin a dialogue. Those included departments in West Chester and Kennett Square, PA, Wilmington, DE, Graham, NC, and the Sandhills area of NC, all areas where the subculture appears to be active. No responses were prompted. Letter, telephone and e-mail message contacts were made with federal justice department and state department personnel involved in trafficking. Usually, responses were received but no action was taken other than to merely take information for the files or express regrets that more manpower resources were not available to conduct follow-up investigations..
Return to Law Enforcement page