![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
North American Incest/Pedophile Subculture And Its Pedophile Child Sex Slave Operations: An Internet Myth or a Frightening Reality? by Gordon Neal Diem, D.A. (This paper was scheduled for delivery at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the Popular Culture Association in the South and the American Studies Association in the South) |
|||||||||||
The internet is full of surprising personas. Some are real; some are fictitious. It is often difficult to determine which are real and which are fictitious. While researching Bondage/Discipline/Sadism/Masochism (BDSM) lifestyle and the Dominant/submissive (D/s) lifestyle in April 2000, contact was established with a cluster of internet personas claiming to be members of a lifestyle community practicing incest, pedophilia, and sex slavery of children and adults. The personas claimed to be two "pedophile daughters," five "pedophile madams," and one "Master," all active in the lifestyle. They claimed to be on the internet recruiting new male Masters into the subculture. The contacts were initially made with these people, and subsequently with others claiming to practice similar lifestyles, through the match-making service ALT.com and through a variety of Yahoo chat rooms, including the adult room, "I want to be F***ed by Older Men," and the teen room, "Daughters Looking for Daddies." Those subsequent contacts included a second Master, a potential Master, a recruited adult "breeder," and several teens and adults who were potential breeder recruits. During the spring and summer of 2000, the personas described in detail the incest and pedophile subculture into which they claimed to have been born and raised or into which they had been recruited. They explained the community's rituals, the process for locating and interviewing potential recruits into the subculture, the process for purchasing, selling, exchanging and disposing of child sex slaves, the details of sexual assault on a child, the methods for kidnapping a child, and a host of other specifics. They described group bonding rituals based on sexual assault on a child, the operation of baby whorehouses, the bestiality activities at barn parties, the ritualistic deflowering of a "pedophile daughter" by her father, and a host of other phenomena. The accounts were similar from persona to persona and each verified or augmented the accounts of the others. Initially, the contacts appeared to be a hoax, and contact with the personas was nearly lost when the accounts were challenged as a hoax. Through repeated chat, messenger, e-mail, and eventual face-to-face contacts the personas took on an air of reality, as did the incestuous pedophile subculture and the commercial child sex slavery they claimed was a part of the subculture. |
|||||||||||
Continue on to: Claims Made by Subculture Members Description of Subculture Participant Roles Are the "Members" Real Persons? Is the Subculture Plausible? Is Child Sex Slavery Plausible? Is this a Law Enforcement Entrapment Scheme? Conclusion |
|||||||||||
Claims Made by Subculture Members | |||||||||||
Other site links on the topic "incest/pedophile subculture" can be found at http://www.oocities.org/pedophile_watch | |||||||||||
![]() |