The brainwashing methods are relatively simple and classic. First, use the terror itself to put people into a state of shock, making them more susceptible to suggestion. Then resort to the "Big Lie" technique to repeatedly hammer home your psywar message--those affirmative answers to the questions we first asked. And most importantly, lie, by suppressing all counter-evidence, by refusing to report anything that might point to the assessment shared by Mr. LaRouche and others: "the cover-up". All this has been done, along with an initial softening of the population to the mass delusional suggestion of the "enemy image" and the alleged capabilities and motivations of the so-called terrorists, PRIOR TO THE LAUNCHING OF THE ATTACK ITSELF.
Don't be so hasty about dismissing the possibility of your own brainwashing. The enemy knows your profile extremely well and uses it against you. Doesn't that make you a bit angry - for the right reasons - perhaps for the first time since just after the Sept. 11th incidents?
Our report below is designed to give you a view from the "inside" of this brainwashing process, to see how it has worked on you and your friends and neighbors. And while we can't yet say who is specifically behind what was done to this country - and is still being done - we can show you how they think about brainwashing and use it to deceive you about anything and everything.
Psychological Terror as a Means of Warfare: "Dresden Redux" ---
Before discussing the brainwashing operation itself, we wanted to provide a little background on the use of terror against mass civilian populations. Not surprisingly, this was pioneered by the brainwashers of the Anglo-American establishment.
As commentators on the scene at "Ground Zero" of the World Trade Center (WTC) attack on Sept. 11th surveyed the devastation, they reached for metaphors to describe the incredible scene. "It looks like Dresden," said one correspondent, referring to the firebombing of that German city by the Allies in 1944.
Dresden had no military value as a target. For centuries, it had been a center of German cultural heritage - a heritage that had everything to do with positive developments in human civilization and nothing to do with the Nazi disease that had been imposed on Germany by the Anglo-American financial elite (or Illuminati). Dresden was chosen for destruction as an act of TERRORISM; directed, not against the Nazis per se, but the German people.
The firebombing of Dresden, creating a raging inferno of destruction that slaughtered more than 100,000 human beings, was conceived and directed by a group of social psychiatrists at the Strategic Bombing Survey, affiliated with the Special Operations Command of the "Office of Strategic Services" (OSS - which has since evolved into the CIA). This group was effectively overseen by the head of the British Psychological Warfare Directorate, Brig. General John Rawlings Rees, director of the Tavistock Institute in London, England, which, since the 1920s, has served as a "center of psychological warfare operations" of the British Empire.
The team at the Strategic Bombing Survey, which included a host of U.S.- based Tavistock operatives, such as Kurt Lewin, Rensis Likert and Margaret Mead, theorized that the terror inflicted on the German population through the "message of Dresden" would break their will to fight, leaving them fearful, frightened, and disorganized. They projected that it would have a lasting effect on Germany, removing that nation from among the great states of Europe, making it a permanently psychologically scarred entity. The German people, they argued, would be made to realize that "all that is German" could be wiped away - all of its culture and history - in an instant, as it were, by any powers who would oppose an assertive future for Germany.
In his 1941 book, "Time Perspective and Morale," Kurt Lewin described the psychology behind the use of this terror tactic for mass effect:
One of the main techniques for breaking morale through "a strategy of terror" consists in exactly this tactic - "keep the person hazy as to where he stands and just what he may expect next. If in addition, frequent vacillations between severe disciplinary measures and promises of good treatment, together with the spreading of contradictory news, make the cognitive structure of this situation utterly unclear, then the individual may cease to know when a particular plan would lead toward or away from his goal. Under these conditions, even those individuals who have definite goals and are ready to take risks would be paralyzed with severe inner conflicts in regard to what to do next."
As the pilots and their crews came to realize what they had done - the creation of a raging inferno, burning civilian targets and civilians - many returned to their bases horrified. At the instruction of the psyops warriors, the crews had not been fully briefed on the mission. Now, they were greeted by teams of psychologists and others who would profile their responses to the terror they had unleashed; they were told, as the crews who later dropped, unnecessarily, atomic bombs on two Japanese cities, that it would "shorten the war."
Cont ...