Elite Bloodline involvement in the 20th Century. Once we understand that the elite bloodlines are working against us and not for us, history starts to make sense. Gettysburg: Royal blood. General Lee ordered his men to advance uphill. A hopeless situation designed to cause nothing but huge loss of life. No-one in their right mind would order such an advance. Lee was a high-ranking Mason. During WW11, soldiers were given the option of certain death by, on most occasions, walking towards machine gun fire or face being shot in the trench for cowardice. During the battle of Somme, they were sent over the top at 07.00 in broad daylight, with the sun low in the horizon so they were easy for German machine gunners to pick out. I forget the figures but it was something like 60000 dead during the first morning. Aristocrats were killed during WW11, but they were not the inner circle bloodline aristocrats, they were the disposable tainted lower bloodlines. Remember, the British aristocracy is only a partial manifestation of the elite bloodlines. Out of hundreds of poss beaches, American troops landed on the most heavily fortified and impenetrable beach (Omaha) during the D-day landings. Their was a huge loss of life as shown in the Spielberg film Saving Private Ryan. Was this totally inept incompetence or by design? I favour the latter.
The Slaughter at Arnham - 1000s of allied troops were dropped 65 miles behind the enemy lines to await the arrival of ground based re-enforcements. Apparently the advance of the speed of advance of the re-enforcements was the critical part of the mission. Reconcile this then. My grandfather was there and after a painfully slow advance towards Arnhem, the Grenadier Guards were in sight of Arnhem itself and indeed, could see the battle. Orders came down from above for them not to advance. The battle continued until the allied troops trapped in Arnhem had been wiped out. The Guards were then allowed to advance. Thats in my family history and has been passed down by word of mouth. This does not even take into account the crazy nature of the whole plan in the first place. The whole thing was guaranteed slaughter.
The German troops were forced ever deeper into the Russia Winter to face certain death. There were major protests from many of the senior German militarists, as they knew what it meant for their men. Hitler would not back down on the orders tho. The policy of advance or be shot was employed by the Russian leaders against their troops. If the troops did not advance, with little or no armaments, into the might of the German war machine, they were shot in disgrace by their own side. Sounds like WW1 all over again. The engineered noghtmare of the battle of Stalingrad resulted in huge loss of life, horrendous conditions. The War of the Rats? I wonder who gave it that name? The deliberately and scientifically orchestrated firebombing of Dresden - The safe city that had no defences or industrialisation? It was known by the allies that 10s of thousands of refugees had fled from other cities, more likely to be bombed, to the Safe Haven of Dresden. Incendiary devices were dropped ahead of massive blockbuster bombs. The resulting firestorm caused winds in excess of 100 miles per hour. By the way, more people died in Dresden than in the atomic bombing of Japan. There were reported to be liquid rivers of human remains in Dresden, the heat was so intense.
The atomic bombing of Japan. There was no need for this. Any non-psycopath could see that the war was over. Even ?fficial history recognises that one bomb was unnecessary, let alone two. The Allies dropped one uranium and one plutonium bomb to see which worked the best. It was also a requirement to strike fear into the World so the Cold War could be properly played out.
I'm sure the list goes on and on. These catastrophes are not accidental, they were by design. The inner circle have no regard for humanity, they see us as a joke and literally enjoy it when we suffer. Wars are also a mechanism for seeding social decay through the minds of the people that suffer. The torment is passed from one generation to the next. There are recurring patterns to the way the elite trick the human psyche into wanting, or even demanding the agenda they set. I believe there are two sets of questions that you can apply to almost any major event of the last century to help get closer to the truth. The first set: What was the problem? What was the people's reaction? What was the end solution? The second set: Who benefited from the outcome? Who were the overall winners and losers? Or, as the roman playwright Seneca puts it: He who gains most advantage from a crime is the one most likely to have committed it. The way that the 'problem, reaction, solution' mind control works is this. The secret government, in secret, causes the problem. This is then publicly hyped into a frenzy through the media. The people, quite rightly, ask: This is terrible, it can't go on.Which is always followed by: What are THEY going to do about it? Of course, the solution offered was the agenda-satisfying aim after all. This is a very simple yet powerful mind control technique and works because fundamentally we, the people, are trusting by nature. Indeed, we are labelled cynical and extreme if we show anything but good faith. If you watch the news with 'problem, reaction, solution' in your mind, it will give you a very different perspective and you will start to see it happening all the time.
The other mind control technique is the 'stepping stones'. This is equivalent to slowly, slowly, catch a monkey. The European Union is a classic example of stepping stones in action. The people who don't even notice they are giving away their freedom, as it happens over many years, indeed in many cases, when some of the initial decisions were made, many of us were not even alive. These techniques were used throughout the last century.
WWI Problem: Spatial, caused by a spurious murder and international tensions. Reaction: That was terrible, that cannot be allowed to happen again. Solution: The League of Nations should be able to stop global conflicts in the future as a governing body in control of several nations. Winner: The agenda for world domination through increased centralisation of power in the League of Nations. Loser: The people of planet Earth.
German Economic Crisis following WWI Problem: Engineered hyperinflation in Germany caused quite deliberately by the treaty of Versailles. Reaction: The German people are desperate, help, we are starving and dying, anybody please help. Solution: Rise to power of Adolf Hitler. Hitler was involved in the Bavarian illuminati. He was also a member of the Thule Society and the Vril Society. A member of the elite Rothschild bloodline. Who, by the way, claim to be jewish. It's a strange world. Winner: Corrupt private banking cartels due to the funding of the re-building of Germany. Loser: The much abused people of Germany.
World War II Problem: WWII was fought over a much wider area than WWI. This was deliberate. The resulting institution would then have jurisdiction over a much wider area of the world than the League of Nations had had. If WWII wasn't orchestrated and controlled by a faceless elite then why did not Hitler invade England when it was there for the taking? What about the elite haven of Switzerland? It may have been neutral, but do you think Hitler would have respected that? Also, why weren't Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle, both of which are sitting ducks, obliterated? It seems like it was only the people of Germany, England and France and so on that were the 'enemies'. The terror organisation SS was the public manifestation of the Bavarian secret societies. It is not often reported, we hear all about the resistance outside of germany, but the strongest resistance to Hitler was within Germany itself. The German resistance was very strong. In fact, the German resistance was let down many times by the allies. I ask you one question. Can you honestly say that you would have had the guts to stand up to Hitler and the Nazis if you had been alive in Germany at that time? Its easy to judge from a distance. All it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to sit back and do nothing. Even the German troops were effectively brainwashed cannon fodder. In general, it was the SS and therefore the secret societies that were the terrorisers, not the troops themselves. Reaction: That was terrible, that cannot be allowed to happen again. The Nation state has caused all this bloodshed. Solution: United Nations. That will stop the worldwide conflicts between nations in the future.
A gang of royals, Stalin, Truman and Churchill then created the Cold War at the Potsdam conference. The Cold War was classic fear-based mind control coupled with 'divide and rule', that old adage of the Roman Empire. Winner: The elite bloodlines through their network of private corrupt banking cartels due to funding of the war and the re-building afterwards. The agenda towards total global domination via the setting up of a larger centralised power unit, the UN. Loser: The people of the world.
The Holocaust. Problem: Many Jewish people were murdered by the Nazi regime. Reaction: That was terrible, we must compensate the Jewish people in some way. Solution: Creation of a Jewish homeland, Israel in the Middle East, sowing the seeds of immediate and indeed future conflict. The introduction of the branding of anti-Semitic for anyone that said anything bad about the Jews. The point here is that these are Jewish people, the ones that suffered in the Holocaust, NOT the Jewish royals, such as the Rothschild family. The Rothschilds can hide behind the anti-Semitic banner, if anyone speaks out against them they can be branded ant-Semitic immediately, causing a trigger of Nazism in the minds of others. They use it as a shield. Hitler was a Rothschild. Winner: The royals that call themselves Jews. Loser: The ordinary Jewish people in every way, shape and form.
The Cold War. Problem: Cold War, resulting from WWII and fake posturing by East and West, East told the West is bad, West told the East is bad. The propaganda machine, the mainstream media was absolutely essential throughout this farce. Reaction: Those guys might invade one day. Solution: Crazy levels of armament build up, enough to destroy the world many times over. Eventual re-integration of East and West when it suited the agenda of total world domination. The Cold War also allowed the creation of the NATO alliance, along with the UN Peacekeeping force. The people of the West feel safe now, we have Nato and the UN to protect us. Yippee. Winners: The elite managed to spawn another set of organisations to slot into the long term agenda. The elite, through their network of corrupt, private banking cartels that made their money from the sale of arms. Losers: The people of the world, through division and rampant manufactured fear.
Collapse of the Soviet Union. Problem: The West is better than the East. Reaction: We want to be like the West. Solution: To install Gorby to oversee reintegration of East and West. According to John Coleman in his book: The Committee of 300 the Stassi was the only intelligence agency that was not controlled by the network of secret societies. Winners: The corrupt banking cartels. The Russian economy was privatised, stealing the wealth from the people in the biggest smash and grab raid in history. Funding (through extra taxes on the German people) of the westernisation of the Eastern parts of Germany and so on. Why didn't Deutsche bank cough up some of the Nazi gold they have been hording since the war? Losers: The Russian people that had their wealth stolen through privatisation.
The Vietnam War. Problem: The Vietnam War Solution: US public were not convinced this was a good idea, but being puppets , as usual, supported the war, at least to begin with. Solution: Send in the troops. Winners: The corrupt banking elite and the arms dealers. American society was embarked upon the agenda of de-stabilistation, by feeding the troops with mind-altering drugs such as LSD that can reprogramme the base functions of the mind. If you take LSD in the middle of a violent battle, you'll never be the same again. Upon return from Vietnam, the troops (and there were many of them) has enormous difficulty to reintegrate into society, creating the seeds of social breakdown that is so evident today. A mentally broken veteran will inevitably pass his mental condition onto his offspring and his partner. The offspring will never know any different and there you go, social decline in the making. Additionally, the returning troops were treated as lepers for having damaged American pride due to the loss. Guess what, a large percentage of the homeless people in the US today are Vietnam veterans. The difference between the veterans of Vietnam and the veterans of WWII is first that the V. vets were fed LSD (although WWII soldiers were fed speed during the D-day landings) and also the number of returning veterans were higher. The Vietnamese were not as effective at killing people as the German industrialised war machine. Losers: The Vietnamese people, the American veterans and the American people as a whole.
The Gulf War. Problem: Saddam Hussein, a royal blood, was funded into power in the same way Hitler was prior to WWII. He then started jumping around the Gulf, a little bit of muscle flexing, just as required. Bush labelled Saddam the New Hitler and said that the WWII has shown that appeasement of such people should not be tolerated. Reaction: Oh no, not another Hitler! Send in the troops now! Solution: Massive arms build-up in the Gulf, the biggest mobilisation of armed forces since WWII. Presented under the banner of the UN. British, US and French armies annihilated Iraq with a casualty rate of many 10s of thousands to one. And don't forget the little gem left for the American troops called the Gulf War Syndrome. Who knows how many unreportedly have been affected by from that. The UN had been tested out and proved that nations could work together to police the world. The UN is established as the way forward and is the seeds of the World Army that will be used to impose martial law on the people of planet Earth. Winner: Corrupt banking cartels and arms dealers. The agenda of the elite for total global domination. The British, French and American people had shown that they were willing to rescind their sovereignty to the UN in times of crisis. This was an important step in the agenda. Losers: The UN troops, mentally and physically through GWS. The people of Iraq.
Conflict in Bosnia. This is the same story as the Gulf War. According to a mainstream program the NATO forces in Bosnia killed more Serbian civilians (by a ratio of 3 to 1) than they did Serb military. This conflict was required to more firmly cement the UN's position as a world police force.
So that is a straightforward and consistent analysis of the outcomes of some of the events that have occurred throughout the 20th Century.These events clearly show an orchestrated approach to the agenda of world domination, or The Great Work of the Ages. The massive Free Trade blocks are further symptoms of the advancing agenda. These trading blocks cover Europe, the Americas and Asia. In time, there may be an African trading block. Eventually all these will be merged under the banner of the World Government. The key thing to take away from this analysis is that we kill each other to the elites beck and call. When they say jump, we jump. This is the herd mentality shining through. It is our responsibility to break free of it. The Germans have never been our enemy, nor the Russians or the Iraqis. It is the elite that we have to watch out for. It is worth remembering that all these wars were made possible only because the people involved in them were intimidated and gave up their right to think. The elite are very clever at building and supporting the opposite sides of a conflict into monstrous enemies, so that people are willing to kill and be killed. - End
BACK TO 'WWII'