The Socialist Party of Great Britain - One
Hundred Years
The Socialist Party
of Great Britain celebrated its centenary in June 2004. The party
was founded by former members of H.M Hyndeman's Social Democratic
Federation after a struggle in that organization. The founding
conference adopted a declaration of principles (which still appears
in every issue of its journal) and began to publish the Socialist
Standard two months later.
From its inception, the SPGB was determined to forge its own
course. The new party refused to join the Second International on the
grounds that it admitted reformist parties. While it had some
relationship with the British followers of Daniel DeLeon in the
Socialist Labour Party (the SLP was also founded by ex-SDFers), the
SPGB regarded every other political organization as an enemy to be
fought. Often referred to as imposssiblists, the SPGB and its
companion parties have steadfastly preached the gospel of socialism
for the last hundred years.
And yet, the SPGB resembles nothing so much as the proverbial
stopped clock that is right twice a day. While they offer some
socialist truths about the nature of socialism and the futility of
reformist struggles, their politics appear to be frozen: An example
of its conception of how capitalism has remained unchanged and the
tactics of a socialist organization.
The SPGB holds that socialism will involve electing a socialist
government and allow for the machinery of government to be "converted
from an instrument of oppression into the agent of emancipation."
(Declaration of Principles). The election of a socialist government
however is premised upon the vast majority of the population coming
to accept, presumably, the party's position. While the SPGB claim
that its actual belief is that "socialist consciousness develops out
of the workers' class experience of capitalism and its problems"
(Socialist Standard August 2004), the party's propaganda suggests the
necessity of educating workers about the virtues of socialism. A
cartoon on the SPGB web site had a party representative sighing that
socialism was such a good idea, but it was a shame no one believed
it.
Using parliament to establish socialism when it serves as "the
executive committee of the bourgeoisie"; reducing socialism to an
ideal which reality will have to accept rather than "the real
movement which abolishes the present state of things"; educating the
workers when it is "essential to educate the educator." The
disappearance of permanent opposition organizations of the working
class over the last century in the face of the deepening of the real
domination of capital seems to have gone unnoticed by the party.
As Marx noted in The German Ideology:
Both for the production on a mass scale of this
communist consciousness, and for the success of the cause itself,
the alternation of men on a mass scale is necessary, an
alternation which can only take place in a practical movement, a
revolution.
For a socialist organization to survive for a century is
impressive; however, to refuse to see how capitalism has changed in
that century certainly cheapens the achievement.
Home Page / Index
/ Articles / Reviews
/ History / Links /
Publications/ Martin
Glaberman Archive /