X. THE OUTSIDE: ADDING TO
THE BODY, JEWELRY
“To be holy is to be pure, and to be pure is to be
natural” (Bill Burkett, Because of the Angels pg 28-29). When God created Adam and then Eve, they
were flawless. They were perfect. There was no need to add to or delete from
their bodies anything to make them more “beautiful.” Perfection cannot be improved upon. God had created them “in His own image.”
The theology or philosophy that I am introducing here is
far from what we experience today in our society. I mentioned in an opening section the dissatisfaction that is so
rampant today with the natural look that God gave us. People are looking to change the natural state that God designed
in the beginning. Do you think God’s
work was incomplete in creating man and needs to be finished? What was He thinking when He made Adam and
Eve? Wasn’t He finished when He created
the human body or did He leave it open for our completion?
To look at some people, you would think that God was
interrupted by some other event in the cosmos more important than the creation
of man. When He returned to His work of
creating man, God must have forgotten where He stopped at and therefore left
off many things that people feel like they desperately needed. Did God forget what He was doing and leave
out those holes in people’s ears, noses, eyebrows, and other places not to be
mentioned? Did he forget to line their
eyes with eye shadow or paint their lips with lipstick? Should we pick up where God left off? Was God’s work in creation incomplete? I don’t think so.
If God’s work was complete and there is no actual need
for additions to the body to enhance “beauty,” are we at liberty if we desire
to add to, or delete from, the body that God has given us? Is there reasoning for or against such
practices? Does God’s Word say anything
directly or indirectly about adding to or deleting from the body in order to
make it more “beautiful”? Keep in mind,
“beautiful” according to man and “beautiful” according to God may be defined
quiet differently. God’s Word
states: “How beautiful are the feet of
them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!”
(Romans 10:15).
Of course, we have plenty of preachers who preach that
God isn’t very interested in the outside.
They say it is all in the heart.
I am saving that issue until later.
The reasoning continues that when Paul wrote to Timothy in I Timothy
2:9, he was only concerned with modesty in apparel. “Paul's idea isn't prohibition, but
modesty and moderation; legalistic bans on make-up and jewelry aren't supported
by this verse” (David Guzik). And then
there are these famous words of J. Vernon McGee: "If the barn needs painting -
paint it!"
Some months ago, when starting out
on the endeavor to write this booklet, I decided to go into a “Christian”
chat-room on-line just to get another perspective. So, I proposed a few statements about very conservative church
standards that were opposed to women wearing jewelry and makeup. I found one response interesting and I will
share it as best I remember. I presume
it was a female who answered something like, “I believe one ought to look the
best they possibly can for our Lord.” I
interpreted this as saying humans need to deck out in jewelry and cosmetics in
order to look good to God. Do we need
to be concerned with how “attractive” in secular human terms we are when we
approach God? Does a female have to
spend an hour putting on eye shadow, lipstick, etc. before she comes to the
throne of grace?
There are others that agree with
this line of thinking that we must deck out for God and apply it as well to human-to-human
contact. “We have many very helpful
cosmetic products today, and I see nothing wrong in using anything that will
make you look better. All of us want to look the best we possibly can” (McGee’s
Thru the Bible). Continuing with more
of the same from this well-known speaker:
“I do believe, though, that a Christian woman should dress in style. At
the Bible institute where I used to teach, someone had given the girls the
notion that they should never use any makeup [I wonder where they got that
idea?] and need not give any care to the way they dressed. I used to tell those
girls that we all ought to look the best we can with what we've got to work
with, although some of us don't have much to work with! I said, "Some of
you would look a little bit better if you would put on just a little make-up,
because you look like you came out of the morgue. That is simply not
attractive, and it does not commend you to God" (McGee’s Thru the
Bible).
It seems to me that his impression
of God’s natural creation was not good enough and needed improvement. Was this advice spiritual or carnal? Was it divine or humanistic? Was it logical or illogical? What would God have thought if when He
presented Eve to Adam, if Adam had said, “Eve dear, you look like you came out
of the morgue”? Perhaps God may have
replied as Paul wrote in Romans 9:20-21
“Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing
formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus? Hath not the potter power over the clay, of
the same lump to make one vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor?”
I seriously question this train of thought that teaches
the addition of worldly elements to God’s creation of the human body. As I asked in the introduction of this
section, did God fall short when he created humans? Did he fail to finish the job by not adding some jewels and a
little paint to Adam and Eve? The
Scriptures tell us in Psalms 149:4 “For the LORD taketh pleasure in his people:
he will beautify the meek with salvation.”
It is my belief that the addition to
the image of God, which we are, is a subtraction from the glory of God. And on what do I base that belief? I want to think that I base that belief on
the Word of God. I do have Scriptures
to support my position. I have already
used many of them in other portions of discussion, but I in no way have
exhausted the entirety of any of them.
I hope to use logic and experience as well to examine the practices of
wearing jewelry, piercing and tattooing, and painting up with cosmetics.
I will begin to present my position
with the familiar verses of I Timothy
2:9 "In like manner also, that
women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not
with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array" and I Peter 3:3 "Whose adorning, let it not be the
outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or putting on of
apparel.” Other Scriptures will follow
as I expand my discussion.
There are many things that can be said about these
Scriptures, but to whom do we listen?
I’ve already given some examples of the liberal perspective. Essentially, they attest that the Scriptures
just listed are applying only to being moderate in the sense of monetary
value. That is, don’t be extravagant. Don’t be flashy. Being flashy may indicate that you lack more than just paint on
the old barn. You may have problems on
the inside as well. According to Adam
Clarke “When either women or men spend much time,
cost, and attention on decorating their persons, it affords a painful proof
that within there is little excellence, and that they are endeavoring to supply
the want of mind and moral good by the feeble and silly aids of dress and
ornament. Were religion out of the question, common sense would say in all
these things: Be decent; but be moderate and modest” (Adam Clarke’s
Commentary).
I’ve already discussed the topic of modesty extensively
in a previous section and it was my conclusion that the writers did exhort us
not to be extravagant. It is my
understanding that they also wanted us to cover our bodies appropriately as to
not appear to be naked or seductive.
But, is that the end of the message?
Is there more here to be said? I
believe there is much yet to be said.
According to Life Application Bible
Notes “Apparently some Christian women were trying to gain respect by looking
beautiful rather than by becoming Christ like in character. Some may have
thought that they could win unbelieving husbands to Christ through their
appearance. It is not unscriptural for a woman to want to be attractive.
Beauty, however, begins inside a person. A gentle, modest, loving character
gives a light to the face that cannot be duplicated by the best cosmetics and
jewelry in the world. A carefully groomed and well-decorated exterior is
artificial and cold unless inner beauty is present.” So, is appearing to be beautiful or attractive the end of the
discussion? Again, I don’t think so.
I believe the admonition incorporated within the thoughts
already discussed includes the unnecessary addition to the body, strictly
interpreted in the form of gold or pearls, but basically implying jewelry. Yes, God does have something to say about
adding to the body that He created.
And, we are not at liberty to do as we please though many may preach and
practice decking out, even doing it in the name of the Lord.
Again, some accept the admonition as implying not to be
extravagant when wearing jewelry, but to exercise moderation. “Peter is not
forbidding the wearing of clothes and ornaments by women, but the display of
finery by contrast” (Robertson’s Word Pictures). But, who then determines what is extravagant and what is
not? There will always be those who
will extend that allowed liberty into extravagance. It is here that those who are not willing to offend in this point
of Scripture will choose to forbear wearing jewelry altogether. You cannot go wrong by being conservative
at this point and remaining natural as God created humans without the
addition of implanted or attached jewels.
Individuals who insist on adding to the body by wearing
jewelry will refer to the examples of the Israelites wearing gold in the Old
Testament. But was it favorable for
them to do so in all cases? What kinds
of issues do we find surrounding some of these examples? Let’s examine a few of the examples and the
experiences surrounding them.
One such example stands out to me in Genesis 35:4 “And
they gave unto Jacob all the strange gods which were in their hand, and all
their earrings which were in their ears; and Jacob hid them under the oak which
was by Shechem.” This chapter begins
with Jacob’s call from God to “go up to Bethel and dwell there: and make there
an altar unto God.” Then Jacob commands
his household to “Put away the strange gods that are among you, and be clean,
and change your garments.” The
household of Jacob responded by giving him the strange gods as he requested,
but it is interesting to note that they also gave him “all their earrings which
were in their ears.” He only asked for
the strange gods, yet they handed over the earrings too. Why?
There must have been a clear connection between the practice of
idolatry, which involved the strange gods and the earrings in their ears.
In looking for information surrounding earrings I found
an interesting fact. In Easton’s Bible
Dictionary, it is stated that “earrings were rings
properly for the ear Genesis 35:4; Numbers
31:50; Ezekiel 16:12. In Genesis 24:47
the word means a nose-jewel, and is so rendered in the Revised Version. In
Isaiah 3:20 the Authorized Version has “ear-rings,” and the Revised Version
“amulets,” which more correctly represents the original word (lehashim), which
means incantations; charms, thus remedies against enchantment
[Underlining added for emphasis.], worn either suspended from the neck or in
the ears of females.” Did you notice
the reference to “incantations” and “charms”?
It appears from this that the earrings were in this case associated with
their idolatry and possibly some sort of superstition or sorcery.
As well, I found this reference to
earrings in the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: “Such jewels were worn in ancient times for protective
as well as for decorative purposes. The
Revised Version (British and American) renders “amulets” for the King James
Version “earrings” in Isaiah 3:20, the Hebrew word (lechashim) being
elsewhere associated with serpent-charming; but the earrings of
Genesis 35:4,
also, were more than mere ornaments [Underlining added for emphasis.],
so the King James Version and the Revised Version (British and American) may
both be right in their renderings here (Kennedy). The influence of Egypt, where amulets of various kinds were worn
by men and gods, by the living and the dead, is shown by recent excavations at
Gezer, Taanach and Megiddo.”
Did you take notice of the phrase
that I underlined? “Apparently, the
earrings also had a pagan connection; though some "reason" could have
been offered for keeping them, they got rid of them nonetheless” (David Guzik). Jamieson, Faussett, and Brown state that the
earrings were “earrings of various forms,
sizes, and materials, which are universally worn in the East, and, then as now,
connected with incantation and idolatry.”
Here at this point I will again introduce some quotations
from the Book of Enoch. Again, I cannot
attest to the validity of this source, but still I find it interesting and so
appropriate that I cannot refrain from using it. In chapter seven, Enoch is continuing his narration concerning
fallen angels when he states: “1 And
all the others together with them [fallen angels] took unto themselves wives,
and each chose for himself one, and they began to go in unto them and to defile
themselves with them, and they taught them charms 2 and enchantments [Underlining added for emphasis.], and the cutting
of roots, and made them acquainted with plants.”
Enoch continues to give us insight on the matter in
chapter eight, which I quote in its entirety:
“1 And Azazel [One of the many fallen angels that Enoch refers to by
name in this chapter.] taught men to make swords, and knives, and shields, and
breastplates, and made known to them the metals of the earth and the art of
working them, and bracelets, and ornaments, and the use of
antimony, and the beautifying of the eyelids, and all kinds of costly stones,
and all 2 colouring tinctures. And there arose much godlessness, and they
committed fornication, and they 3 were led astray, and became corrupt in all
their ways. Semjaza taught enchantments, and root-cuttings, 'Armaros the
resolving of enchantments, Baraqijal (taught) astrology, Kokabel the
constellations, Ezeqeel the knowledge of the clouds, Araqiel the signs of the
earth, Shamsiel the signs of the sun, and Sariel the course of the moon. And as
men perished, they cried, and their cry went up to heaven . . .[Underlining added for emphasis.]”
I am beginning to understand
why Jacob’s household turned over the earrings with the strange gods. What I don’t understand is why those who
call themselves Christian want to return to the oak tree in Shechem and dig
up what Jacob buried hundreds of years ago and call that liberty which
Jacob and his household realized to be idolatry.
Another similar example, which relates jewelry to
idolatry, is Exodus 32:2-3 “And Aaron said unto them, Break off the golden
earrings, which [are] in the ears of your wives, of your sons, and of your
daughters, and bring [them] unto me.
And all the people brake off the golden earrings which
[were] in their ears, and
brought [them] unto Aaron.” This was in
response to the people’s request to “make us gods.” We all know what happened next.
Aaron fashioned a molten calf and proclaimed “these be thy gods.” Everything continues downhill from that
point. Why did the people use the
plural term of “gods”? Why did Aaron
use plurality when saying “these be thy gods”?
Was there one golden calf or many?
I understand that there was only one calf, but was this one calf a
combination of the “gods” represented by their earrings? If so, Aaron could refer to the one calf as
“these be thy gods.” Nonetheless, the
people strayed and their earrings were used as instruments of their rebellion.
Gideon experiences like fate when he takes the earrings
of the Ishmaelites and fashioned an ephod in Judges 8:24-27. These Scriptures tell us how “all Israel
went thither a whoring after it: which thing became a snare unto Gideon, and to
his house.”
I cannot say that earrings and gold have always been
associated with idolatry, but I have just listed three Old Testament examples
in which they were directly or indirectly linked to idolatry and the
backsliding of God’s people. However,
there exist many more arguments that support the position to be conservative
and abstain from wearing jewelry such as the need to pierce the body in order
to attach many such pieces. I would
like to address this issue in the next section.