Hong Kong’s Midlife Crisis: Examining the Changing Portrayal of Mainland Chinese in Hong Kong Media

 

The Mediettes

Sarah Garman

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analytical Questions: By conducting these interviews, I hope to answer some questions essential to my research.  Upon answering these questions, the expert interviewees will have directed my research to a more focused topic, and will have given me the background information necessary to write a comprehensive report on my research.

 

1)      How has the media’s portrayal of mainland Chinese changed since the handover of Hong Kong to China in 1997?

2)      What are the stereotypes commonly applied to mainland Chinese, and do they exist in Hong Kong presently?

3)      What is the public opinion of mainland Chinese, and is this opinion supported by the television in Hong Kong?

4)      Is there a discrepancy in way the older and younger generations in Hong Kong perceive mainland Chinese?

 

Experts:  Professor Staci Ford is a Professor of American Studies at Hong Kong University.  She has been a professor at HKU for twelve years, and has been living in Hong Kong since the early 90’s.  She has taught popular culture at HKU, and is familiar with the opinions of the younger generation in Hong Kong.  Professor Ford is able to give a rather objective opinion of the situation in Hong Kong, being a new resident of Hong Kong from a non-HK background.

 

Professor Eric Kit-wai Ma is an associate Professor at the School of Journalism and Communication at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.  He is also the Head of the Graduate School Communication Division at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.  Professor Ma has written many publications on the identity crisis in Hong Kong and popular culture in Hong Kong, including Culture, Politics and Television in Hong Kong (Routledge, 1999).

 

 

Method of Interviews:  Since both Professor Ford and Professor Ma have very busy schedules and could devote little time to these interviews, the interviews were conducted via email.  I sent each professor a list of interview questions for them to answer at their leisure. 

 

Analysis of Each Interview:  After sending Professor Ma the interview questions, he replied having only answered two of the questions.  However, Professor Ma did send me three of the papers he had recently written concerning the attitude of Hong Kongers towards mainland residents, and the changing identity in Hong Kong (Translocal Spatiality, A Transborder Desire, and Top Down Patriotism and Bottom Up Nationalism in Hong Kong).  These papers had a wealth of information, and are available on the Classroom Across the Pacific website.  Thus, I will treat these papers as answers to my interview questions.

 

 

 

1.  How long have you been a Professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong?

                        Professor Ma has been a Professor at CUHK for 9 years.

 

2.  What interests you about communication and popular culture in Hong Kong?

Professor Ma seems to have an interest in the “…redrawing of psychological boundaries between Hong Kong and mainland Chinese people in daily life (Top-Down pg. 2).”  He also mentioned that he has had an interest in communication and popular culture in Hong Kong for 20 yrs.

 

3.  What were your experiences in Hong Kong before the 1997 handover?

In Top-Down Patriotism and Bottom-Up Nationalism in Hong Kong, Professor Ma stated that “Since the 1990’s, especially after 1997, the differences between Hong Kong and mainland China have been less distinctive (pg. 3).”  Professor Ma has had extensive experience in Hong Kong before 1997, both as a resident and as a researcher.

 

4.  To what extent do you think public identity is shaped by the influence of the media?

This question was perhaps too broad, for Professor Ma had no comment and none could be found in his papers.

 

5.  What seems to be the general attitude in Hong Kong towards the mainland?

Presently, the general attitude seems to be one of change.  The Hong Kong residents seem to be rethinking the previous opinions of mainlanders.  Professor Ma stated that “…for those Hong Kong people who live in or make frequent visit [visits] to China, mainlanders come to be seen as much more diversified, and cannot easily be fit into those stereotypes that dominate the Hong Kong media (Top-Down pg. 14).”

 

6.  In what way do you think the public opinion of mainland Chinese residents has changed from before 1997? 

Professor Ma stated that before 1997, “Local culture was strengthened by “othering” China.”  It is also interesting to note that in the 1980’s and 1990’s, “Hong Kong people identified themselves more as members of the international community then [than] members of the Chinese nation (Top-Down pg. 6).” 

 

 

7.                              And to what extent do think this is due to a change in the media’s portrayal of the    mainland Chinese residents since 1997? 

According to Professor Ma, “China in the 1960’s, 1970’s and 1980’s was indeed poor, and did show little diversity in its population,” but that “this image continued to be portrayed in the mainlander stereotypes in Hong Kong mass media in the 1980’s and 1990’s (Top-Down pg. 16).”  The media has changed its presentation of mainlanders, for instance since 1997, “The rising popularity of the term “Greater Pearl River Delta” in the media is indicative to the re-imagination of Hong Kong not as a distinctive colony, but an integral part of South China (Top-Down pg. 6).”  This is an active attempt on the part of the media to find common ground between Hong Kong and China, and thus to help the residents of Hong Kong to feel a sense of brotherhood with mainland China.

 

 

8.  During your time in Hong Kong before the 1997 handover, did you notice any stereotypes that Hong Kongers had of mainland Chinese residents? 

Professor Ma mentioned that the “Hong Kong colony was kept alive…by vivid but crude representations of mainlanders.”  He also said that “The invention of a Hong Kong identity was strengthened by the othering of mainland Chinese and seeing them as a monolithic collectivity of uncivilized mass (Top-Down pg. 14).”  Furthermore, Professor Ma mentioned that “The Chinese Communist Party had been a symbol of repression, especially since the 1989 Tiananman massacre (Top-Down pg. 7).”

 

9.  What are the stereotypes that presently exist in Hong Kong of mainland Chinese?

Recently, Professor Ma did some field work in mainland China, where at a  Dongguan tea house he noticed a Hong Kong resident’s reaction to the mainland Chinese waiter.  When the Hong Konger dropped his fork and the waiter did nothing, the Hong Kong man shouted “Why didn’t you bring me another fork?  You mainland bumpkins are so stupid!  You won’t stand a chance in Hong Kong! (Top-Down pg. 14)”  This is an obvious indication that some Hong Kongers still have a stereotypical mindset towards mainland residents.

 

10.  Have you noticed a discrepancy in the way older and younger generations perceive     mainland Chinese residents? 

Professor Ma had no comment on this issue.

 

11.  Have there been any specific television programs in Hong Kong that included blatant stereotypical portrayals of mainland residents? If so, can you name some of these programs? 

There were two programs mentioned by Professor Ma.  These were Black Ice and Up Where We Belong.  According to Professor Ma in Transborder Desire, “Black Ice is inflating an idealized modern Hong Kong woman (pg. 7),” and “Up Where We Belong…plays the role of teaching the Mainland audience the way to modernity (pg. 8).”  “Comparing Black Ice and Up Where We Belong, the former is learning from below while the latter is teaching from below, reflecting the discursive impulses of their respective Mainland and Hong Kong authorship (Transborder pg. 9).”

 

12.  How much censorship is there of Hong Kong television coming directly from Beijing? 

Professor Ma had no comment on this issue, but a sense of censorship is implied         in his response to the following question.

 

13.  Within Hong Kong media, is there a sense of political correctness, a direct effort to avoid generalizations of mainland Chinese residents?

Professor Ma did state that “…in the face of the demand for re-sinicization, the discources of ‘resisting communists’ and ‘othering China’ are political [politically] incorrect and have been quickly suppressed in public discussion (Top-Down pg. 8).”

 

14.  It seems to me that before the 1997 handover, Hong Kongers were more inclined to     attack the people of mainland China than the government of China.  Why do you think this was the case?

Professor Ma had no comment towards this question, and does not address it in his papers.  Perhaps this is because he does not agree with the statement, or perhaps he feels it is a smaller issue than the whole issue of stereotyping mainland China.

 

 

After having difficulty coordinating schedules, I decided to send Professor Ford my questions as well.  She answered each of the questions, and since I did not have to look for her answers within three papers, my analysis will be included in the comparison/conclusion section.

 

Comparison of the Two Experts and Conclusion:  I found my two expert interviewees different in length and style of response, but I feel that the interviews do not contradict one another.  Professor Ma was reluctant to give me any of his time, resulting in a “treasure hunt” for his responses; however, I feel very satisfied in the support his papers gave me and could not have hoped for a more reassuring substantiation to my research.  It is likely that Professor Ma found some of my questions general (see question 2 for Professor Ma), but more likely that they were so similar to papers he had previously written that he did not find it necessary to reiterate himself.  Professor Ford was more willing to answer my questions, and answered each of them according to her experience.  However, Professor Ford is an American Studies Professor, and thus found some of my questions difficult to answer.   Many of her responses were prefaced with “Hard to say” or “Depends”.  Professor Ford also had a problem with the same question Professor Ma had a problem with (see question 3 for Professor Ford).  Both professors found this question too vague to answer.  In asking this question, I was not asking for a lengthy description of all the professor’s pre-1997 experiences; rather, I was attempting to determine whether or not the professor had had any pre-1997 experiences in Hong Kong.  Professor Ma’s papers gave me plenty of information regarding most of my questions, with the exception of censorship and generational issues in Hong Kong.  I feel equally confident with Professor Ford’s answers, even though she is coming from a slightly different background.  Professor Ford was able to answer the questions with the Hong Kong youth in mind, and many of her questions gave insight into the minds of the Hong Kong youth (see questions 4, 7, and 10 in Professor Ford’s interview).  She was also able to provide some more information on the role of the media in Hong Kong, especially towards the younger generation.  I was surprised at one of Professor Ford’s answers, in which she stated that “…younger people are more anxious about mainlanders and lack experience their elders have (question 11).”  This answer was unexpected, for I previously thought that the younger generation would have a more open and tolerant mindset towards mainland Chinese.  While this still may be true, I will have to research the issue further.  This issue of “generational discrepancies” was one which neither professor could give me much information.  Professor Ford supported much of what Professor Ma said in his papers, particularly concerning the stereotypes.  She mentioned that mainland Chinese were “…seen as uneducated, unfashionable, aggressive, rather backward,” and that the present stereotypes of mainland residents include the “…label of materialistic and/or wealthy (see questions 9 and 10).”  The latter coincides with the new business successes in mainland China, and what I feel Hong Kongers are seeing as a “nuevo riche” mindset in China.  Both professors guided my research and gave me valuable insight into the issues concerning the issue of the media’s portrayal of mainland Chinese in Hong Kong.  My questions could have possibly been less redundant; however, that was an attempt on my part to make sure the responses did not contradict one another and to glean well-supported conclusions from the responses.  I feel that these findings complement well my own ideas, and will prove valuable support in my final presentation.  The use of stereotypes in Hong Kong media is becoming less and less obvious as media sources see the need to be politically correct.  As “transborder” travel and communication becomes more prominent, the present stereotypes will change even further.  Presently, the media has moved from portraying the mainlanders as “country bumpkins” to “little brothers” receiving guidance and advice from the more-experienced big brother Hong Kong.  This relationship is evident in Hong Kong media, especially soap operas, but some Hong Kong residents still hold to the old stereotypes.  I believe that the older generation of Hong Kong struggles with this more, partly because of a formerly more tyrannical Communist government in China.  It is hard to determine whether Hong Kong is moving from these mainland stereotypes to full acceptance, or to another set of stereotypes.  Perhaps I will find answers to this and other questions during my research.

 

 

 

 

 

Bibliography

 

Bordwell, David.  Planet Hong Kong: Popular Cinema and the Art of Entertainment.  Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.

 

Culture, Politics, and Television in Hong Kong.  New York: Routledge, 1999.

 

Top-Down Patriotism and Bottom-Up Nationalism in Hong Kong.  Eric Kit-wai Ma. 

 

Transborder Desire: fantasizing, learning and apprehending a higher modernity.  Eric Kit-wai Ma.  28 November 2004.

 

Online Resources:

TVBI:  http://www.tvb.com/

HK Television Programs Database:   http://www.hkbu.edu.hk/~lib/electronic/hktvd.html

 

Expert Contact Information

Professor Eric Kit-wai Ma, The Chinese University of Hong Kong:  ericma@cuhk.edu.hk

Professor Staci Ford, Hong Kong University:  sford@hkucc.hku.hk

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix

Professor Ma (see papers, Classroom Across the Pacific website):
 
 1. How long have you been a Professor at the Chinese University of 
 Hong Kong?
 9 yrs
 2. What interests you about communication and popular culture in Hong 
 Kong?
 20 yrs
 3. What were your experiences in Hong Kong before the 1997 handover?
 qn too general, 
 
 4. To what extent do you think public identity is shaped by the 
 influence of the media?
 
 5. What seems to be the general attitude in Hong Kong towards the 
 mainland?
 
 6. In what way do you think the public opinion of mainland Chinese 
 residents has changed from before 1997?
 
 7. And to what extent do think this is due to a change in the media’s 
 portrayal of the mainland Chinese residents since 1997?
 
 8. During your time in Hong Kong before the 1997 handover, did you 
 notice any stereotypes that Hong Kongers had of mainland Chinese 
 residents?
 
 9. What are the stereotypes that presently exist in Hong Kong of 
 mainland Chinese?
 
 10. Have you noticed a discrepancy in the way older and younger 
 generations perceive mainland Chinese residents?
 
11. Have there been any specific television programs in Hong Kong that 
 included blatant stereotypical portrayals of mainland residents? If 
 so, can you name some of these programs?
 
 12. How much censorship is there of Hong Kong television coming 
 directly from Beijing?
 
 13. Within Hong Kong media, is there a sense of political correctness, 
 a direct effort to avoid generalizations of mainland Chinese residents?
 
 14. It seems to me that before the 1997 handover, Hong Kongers were 
 more inclined to attack the people of mainland China than the 
 government of China. Why do you think this was the case?
 
 
 
Professor Ford

 

How long have you been a Professor at Hong Kong University?

 

12 years

 

And what made you want to teach at HKU?

 

My husband and I decided to relocate to HK, I contacted several universities,

liked HKU the best and was able to establish a connection here.

 

Have you had any experiences in Hong Kong before the 1997 handover?

 

Not sure what you're getting at here?  Since we moved here in the early 1990s,

there were lots of experiences prior to the handover.  Feel free to ask a more

specific question...

 

How much do you think television in Hong Kong influences the public?

 

Hard to say.  Most of our students watch some TV but numbers of those who have

access to a full range of stations (cable) are still rather limited. When I

teach popular culture and ask this question, they tell me that they watch but

don't really feel particularly influenced.  However, it could be that they

haven't really given much thought to the question.

 

To what extent do you think public identity is shaped by the influence of the

media?

 

Again, hard for me to say. I think HK people are quite attuned to what media

reports - and they are keen to know what outside media sources think of HK but

'public identity' is a pretty big label.

 

What seems to be the general attitude in Hong Kong towards the mainland?

 

Depends on your political stance.  Keep in mind that the borders are more

porous than media reports in the US would have you believe. Many people have

family still in the mainland, or commute themselves back and forth.  "The

Mainland" is different than the govenment in Beijing.  There are strong

cultural ties to China but also anxieties that the politicians in Beijing

don't really understand HK people.

  

In what way do you think the public opinion of mainland Chinese residents has

changed from before 1997?

 

I think there are still some pretty strong stereotypes of 'mainlanders' but

there is a bit more understanding that the stereotypes don't hold all that

often.  There is still anxiety among students that mainlanders will have a leg

up in the job market in certain places.

 

And to what extent do think this is due to a change in the media's portrayal

of the mainland Chinese residents since 1997?

 

I don't think there's been that much change, I think it's more a matter of

more Mainlanders coming to HK.  But I don't read the Chinese press so I'm only

going on the images seen in the western press - very limited sample.

 

During your time in Hong Kong before the 1997 handover, did you notice any

stereotypes that Hong Kongers had of mainland Chinese residents?

 

Yes - they were seen as uneducated, unfashionable, aggressive, rather backward

 

What sorts of stereotypes, if any, do you presently see in Hong Kong of

mainland Chinese?

 

The old stereotypes still exist except now the label of materialistic, and/or

wealthy is thrown about a bit more...

 

Have you noticed a discrepancy in the way older and younger generations

perceive mainland Chinese residents?

 

I think younger people are more anxious about mainlanders and lack experience

their elders have.

 

Have you seen any specific portrayals of mainlanders in Hong Kong television

that you could share with me?

 

I'm more familiar with film portrayals...Keep in mind that HK soap operas are

in Cantonese with no subtitles so I don't watch them and that's where the

stereotypes would creeep in.  You need to interview people who are more in

touch with Cantonese-language sources!