House Bill is Better May 14, 2002 I contacted Senator Mary Jo
White's office while I was in Harrisburg last Tuesday. She is Chair of the
Environmental Resources and Energy Committee, which is responsible for
landfills and hazardous wastes. I was specifically interested in
House Bill 1436 and Senate Bill 814.
These are two views on "host municipality agreements." The Bills were filed as companions so both
chambers could discuss the idea simultaneously. The idea is that the landfill
operator and the township must agree in advance on how the landfill will be
operated. The Bills provide a detailed
process of public hearings, minimum required contents of the agreements. The
DEP is required to review the agreement to assure that it complies with current
regulations. A non-binding
arbitration process is provided to help resolve disputes between the parties
during the negotiations. House Bill 1436 passed the House
on November 19, 2001 and was referred to Senator White's Committee on
December 3, 2001. Here the Bills diverge. Section 105 of the House Bill requires a
two-year moratorium on all landfill permits.
Existing enterprises could continue, but no new permits or modifications
will be issued. The Senate version does not
require a moratorium, but it does require binding arbitration. The operator and the township must submit
any issues they can't resolve to an arbitration board. The board has 120 days to hear the matter
and render a decision. The parties
are bound by whatever the board decides. I prefer the House version,
whether or not it includes the Moratorium language. If binding arbitration is required, it assumes that there must
be some kind of agreement. Neither
party can stand up and say "No."
I prefer to believe that two parties in good faith can resolve the
issues in front of them. Arbitration
may speed things along, but people can resolve things. Under the language of Senate Bill 814, the
arbitration board is unconditionally empowered to impose a settlement to
which nobody agreed. The chance of an
imposed agreement ending up in Court is substantial. We are already the most litigious society
in the history of the world, and here again would be an issue that would have
no end. I vote for the House version. |