MONDAY, 25 JUNE 2007: DAY- FIVE OF TRIAL IN TALLAHASSEE CASE ~ REPORTING FROM THE FRONT LINES ~





JURY VERDICT: NO JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFFS ---

                                           
  WE WIN!!!
                                                 written and submitted by Jerome Heinemann  ( W V )

The day began in USDC Court, Tallahassee, at 9:00 am with Closing Arguments first by Andrew Byrne,
Tallahassee  attorney  for  Kennedy - Dallas-faction.   All  during  the  trial  Byrne  was  assisted by two additional attorneys from his law firm,  and  one attorney / parliamentarian " expert ",   James Slaughter from North Carolina @ $3000.00 per / day. 

Today however, Slaughter was not present although  throughout  the  entire  trial  to  date,  Slaughter seemed " joined-at-the-hip " with Byrne!  After Byrne made the first of his two - part Closing Statement, he was followed by  Defendants  Shawn O ' Hara  (MS),  then  Jerome  Heinemann (WV),  then  Nelson 'Skip' Foley (ME), then Jeanne  Doogs  (TX),  and lastly by John Blare (CA) in the order they appeared in this lawsuit.  Each side had a total of one hour to present their Closing Arguments. 

Without prior rehearsal or prompting, each Defendant, acting Pro Se,  presented  the case in their own words and when the Closing Statements were over, they complimented each other as if building a brick wall and then some.  Lastly, attorney Byrne gave the second part, the rebuttal, of his two - part Closing Argument. 

After that, the Federal Judge read his Instructions to the Jury and the Jury  then  left  the  courtroom to begin their deliberations. After about forty - five minutes, a request came in from the Jury for six copies
of the 2003 - 2005 RPUSA Constitution, some  yellow marking pens, and the list of the exhibits entered
into the trial by all parties. 

Then after more than four - and - one - half hours of deliberation,  the  Jury announced it had reached a Verdict. The charge to the Jury was as follows: 

                    " Do you find by the greater weight of the evidence that the vote  changing
                      officers at the June 2005 Tampa convention was valid?"   All the Jury had
                      to do was check off either "YES" or "NO"  and the Jury gave a resounding
                      unanimous "NO"! A "Yes" would have made Kennedy and her cohorts the
                      National Officers of the RPUSA,  a "No"  means Kennedy and her cohorts
                      are NOTHING within the RPUSA! 

It  was  clear from  the  testimony  that
Texas is  NOT a legitimate  State  Party  Organization  (SPO) compared to the Texas  legal  requirements for political parties  -  the same is true about  some  others " allied " to the Kennedy - Dallas - faction !    

True to past performance when not getting her way, after the Jury Verdict against her, Kennedy began pounding on the table  with a  large  writing  object,  and  the  noise  was  obvious  to  everyone  in  the courtroom,  including  the  Federal  Judge  since  her  antics were interrupting his final instructions and appreciation to the Jurors for being on the Jury and reaching a decision. 

The Judge almost stopped his talking to chastise Kennedy,  but  motioned  to her attorney to bring her under control.  The  attorney was by now really " red-faced "  either  from  embarrassment  or anger or both for losing  -- again! 

That ' s right,  this  is  the THIRD LOSS  in  a  row  for Cooper & Byrne, PLLC while " representing"  the
RPUSA, as they called it!  While they originally lost the 2004 Florida ballot  line  case  for Ralph Nader,
they were given a reprieve by the Supreme Court of Florida and Nader was given the ballot line for the
Reform Party of Florida.    

But this same law firm LOST in the USDC, Gainesville,  Florida,  in the FEC v. RPUSA, et al.,  when the
RPUSA was Ordered to repay the U.S. Treasury the sum of $333,558.00, plus interest. Both the Order
and  Judgment  were issued on 22 and 23 November 2005  --  and Kennedy is listed as one of several
responsible for repayment of the Debt  -- not to mention that no expenditure can be made by any element of the RPUSA until the Debt to the U.S. Treasury is repaid in full! 

That raises the full spectrum of this case as to how these attorneys have been  paid for the last three -
years with  NO  PUBLIC FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES  as required by law.  Every  time  we  attempted  to open this door in court, the Judge sustained all objections -- but we established that an official record, or lack thereof, definitely exists!    

On 1 March 2007, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, Atlanta, Georgia, UPHELD the USDC, Gainesville,
FEC v. RPUSA, et al.,  case  --  and  now  the  Debt  and  Injunction  are locked in stone!  That was the
SECOND LOSS for Andrew Byrne --  until the THIRD LOSS in a row in this case today! 

This  case  was  styled,  RPUSA  v.  O ' Hara, et al., Case No. 4:05cv426, USDC, Tallahassee,  Florida.
And this is the eleventh or twelfth loss in a row for ole - Bev  in the last seven years since she has tried
to sue her way to the top  instead  of  becoming  a  competent  person  capable  of  being  elected and carrying out her duties!  BUT the good news is that this is the  first  time  Bev  can  be  held  personally
liable for her frivolous actions and that will be commencing most probably in the very near future. 

Meanwhile, Andrew Byrne, Bev 's attorney, will be banished to New York City come 1 July 2007! 

This  is  the  second  attorney  to  be  shown the door at Cooper & Byrne & Blue, PLLC since this case
began seventeen months ago --  the first being Jackson Maynard, Jr.   Senior  partner Cooper is trying
to " cut his losses "  when the countersuits begin -- or so it would seem!         

An ironic twist-of-fate is that Valli Sharpe-Geisler made an agreement with  the Kennedy-Dallas-faction
to pay homage and acknowledge Kennedy and her cohorts as national  officers  of  the  RPUSA  in  an
announced " out-of-court-settlement " last Monday when the case began. In exchange Sharpe -Geisler
was  promised  she  would not be further sued into the " hundreds-of-thousands "  of  dollars!  In short,
Kennedy  testified  that she was " authorized "  to  make  these  offers at settlement when  in fact  they
they amounted to threats of extortion! 

But since Sharpe-Geisler sold out her integrity for fear of material loss -she in effect " switched sides "
from a defendant to a plaintiff ! But now that the Defendants have WON -  now Sharpe - Geisler is just
as much liable for this frivolous lawsuit in general, compensatory and punitive damages, among a host
of others!  Sooo.. po-Valli is now facing not only a loss of good faith in her fellow Reform defendants -
now she is facing being sued for restitution  for  having  stabbed  her fellow  Reform  defendants in the
back!    

While the Kennedy - Dallas - faction vacationed in the Doubletree - Downtown,  the Defendants stayed
in the Motel 6 - Downtown -- in opposite directions but  both within  easy walking distance if necessary.
The  Defendants  traveled  by  taxi  each  day,  partied  around  the  swimming  pool  as  desired,  and generally ate together and discussed the various issues involved in this case together. 

The Jury was a very educated group of  Citizens,  all college graduates,  and they could easily see the
difference in the demeanor between the Kennedy - faction and the Defendants!  In  fact  there  was no
comparison when comparing Kennedy, Weill, both McKelveys, Collison, and Slaughter -- and  all of the witnesses called by the Plaintiffs!  Their credibility was easily defeated in Cross-examination. 

As for the Defendants, each was called to the witness - stand and came across with decency,  integrity
and intelligence in all phases -- particularly in Cross-examination!  The Jurors  realized  this conclusion
and  stuck  to  their  basic  instincts of applying Common Sense and Common Knowledge to determine
fact from fiction!    

In  the  end,  all  the  money  at  their  disposal,  and still the  Kennedy - Dallas - faction  could  not buy
themselves a political party !   And in spite of having an organized effort in front  of  the  Jury,  assisted
with attorneys at every hand --  and even with a complete " make-over " for ole - Bev,  including  a new
hairstyle, new cloths, and a new look -- still underneath Kennedy was her ole - terse self and worse!

Not only was she a poor witness for her side, Janelle Weill,  Diane &  Alec McKelvey, David Collison and
their superstar, James Slaughter -- all failed to deliver any integrity from  the witness - stand!  It was  all
choreographed too slick to be believable! 

As Lincoln once said, " You can fool all the people some of the time, some people all the time, but not all  the  people  all  the  time! "   This  was  one  Jury  of  our  fellow  Citizens who were
NOT FOOLED
by glitz, smoke and mirrors or deceit!     

NOW WATCH THE REFORM PARTY USA REALLY REUNITE AND MOVE FORWARD FOR THE MUTUAL BENEFIT OF ALL CONCERNED! 

ALAS, ALAS  --  THE  RPUSA IS  FREE  AT  LAST !
<<< RETURN TO FRONT PAGE
GO TO DAILY REPORTS >>>
CORRECTION:  THIS ARTICLE WAS WRITTEN BY HEINEMANN AND WAS EMAILED BY FOLEY WHICH
                          CAUSED THE WEBMASTER TO INCORRECTLY ATTRIBUTE WORK TO FOLEY.  PLEASE
                           ACCEPT MY  SINCERE APOLOGIES REGARDING THIS ERROR.   THANK YOU !