ENGLISH 101
Section K
MWF 11:00 - 11:50 Breis 13
W 12:00 - 12:50 Lab Breis 14
Instructor: Trisha
Brady
Office: Kirby Hall
#204
Office
Hours: MW 9:30 – 10:30; M 5:00 - 6:00.
E-Mail: trisha.brady@wilkes.edu
AIM: Rubeebuzz
Mailbox: Located
outside the English Office, Kirby Hall #214
You can
find the syllabus on the My Courses Blackboard
http://www.oocities.org/rubeebuzz/index.html (Research Links, Syllabus, and Assignments)
Course description:
The theme for this course is
Rhetoric, Representation, and Creative Protest in the Public Sphere. In
addition to talking about how to construct strong arguments and papers, we will
discuss how America’s government and laws have been imagined and represented by
various authors as well as how they have been critiqued by individuals and
groups often excluded from the democratic process or considered to be
inferior. Through a focus on initiatory
speech and action, we will consider how oppressed peoples and individuals have
used forms of creative protestation to overcome injustice and to educate others
about social problems.
We will begin our course by
discussing the elements of argument. Then, we will read and discuss Thomas
Jefferson’s "Declaration of
Independence" and Henry David Thoreau’s “Resistance to Civil
Government.” Both texts embrace democratic principles and have warrants that
guarantee the right the revolt. We will also
read excerpts from William Brown's slave narrative, which represents the harsh
experience of slavery, and discuss the way the fugitive slave embraced his or
her right to revolt. Then, we’ll discuss
various texts of the Women’s Suffrage Movement and the Civil Rights Movement to
further our discussions of civil disobedience and creative protest. Finally, we will consider music as a medium
of creative protest. The assigned texts will allow you to polish
your reading skills while providing general topics for your essays. Because the readings for this course are
varied, short, and few, I will often require you to re-read an essay for class
or as part of a revision assignment. These
texts offer the course continuity and will serve as a point of departure for
your writing.
In addition to reading and discussing diverse texts, you
will be required to read and respond to student papers written for this
course. English 101 is designed to teach
you strategies for writing and reading texts.
Your course work and readings are structured to familiarize you with the
following operations: definition, summary, analysis, synthesis, critique, and
argument. The complexity of the writing
assignments will increase gradually throughout the term as you develop your
critical, organizational, and rhetorical skills. This writing course emphasizes recursive
reading and writing strategies. In other
words, we will return to the texts that we read throughout the term, again and
again, in an effort promote the revision and development of the papers you
write during the semester. Much of your
time will be spent reading and workshopping the texts/papers you and your peers
produce in this class. In addition, you
will be introduced to research methods and will write a research paper for this
course using proper documentation of sources.
We will have several writing workshops throughout the
term. The purpose of the workshops is to
focus our attention upon the texts you write for the course and to address
common writing issues. Generally, I
choose the paper that will be used for workshop. The student author of that paper will remain
a mystery to the class; he or she will be an anonymous author during the
workshop. A paper workshop will always
be announced in advance and will focus, mainly, upon issues of content,
organization, coherence, and MLA citation.
You will be required to read a student paper, which I will pass out to
you, for paper workshops. In workshops,
we will read an anonymous student’s paper and have a discussion about the
strengths and weaknesses of the paper while we discuss strategies for revising
the paper for the final portfolio.
Additional workshops on organizing information, explicating quotes,
grammar, sentence and paragraph construction, as well as documentation, will be
given in class and in the lab, throughout the term. I will usually provide a handout for these
workshops on the day of the workshop or we will build a discussion around a
student text.
In this course, you will be required to write informal but
typed homework or response papers, and a total of four formal essays. Additionally, you will be required to revise
and extend three of your formal essays for the final portfolio. One of those revisions will extend a previous
paper into an eight - ten page research paper.
Texts
·
Course packet (I will distribute)
·
Little, Brown Compact Handbook (available at the bookstore)
·
A World of Ideas (available
at the bookstore)
Supplies:
Save all
the writing you do during the semester. You can clear your files in December. Until then, you never know what may prove to
be useful during a revision. If you
compose and revise on a computer, periodically print out and save on disk
versions of your draft so that you have a record of its process. Also, I recommend saving your work on two
disks (a disk you use and carry and a backup disk) because files can be lost
due to viruses as well as damage to a disk.
Keep a copy for yourself (either on disk or a hard copy) of all major
assignments handed in to me. In
addition, keep all drafts on which you have received comments from me, or your
classmates.
Your work for this course must be typed. If you have
not yet begun to use a word-processing program, now is the time to begin. (I use and recommend MSWord. You can purchase discounted software from UB
Micro.) In a course like this, where you
are expected to revise regularly, you will make your life easier by doing your
revisions on a computer. If you need
help with a word-processing program, see me immediately.
Course Requirements and Grading Policy
Grading Policy:
This is a workshop course in writing in which class activities are essential to
your development as a writer. In-class
activities will include free-writing, consultations and discussions with
members of your workgroup, and critiquing and editing of your workgroup's
papers. The success of the course— and your successful performance in
it—depends upon your participation and contributions, both spoken and
written. Your final grade will be based
upon class participation and formal writing assignments, including a final
portfolio consisting of three revised drafts and a formal research paper (8-10
pages).
Below is the how the percentage grades assigned on
essays translate to the Wilkes University 4-point grade scale:
90-100 = 4.0 75-79 = 2.5 60-64 = 1.0
85-89 = 3.5 70-74 = 2.0 59
& below = 0.0
80-84 = 3.0 65-69 = 1.5
Grading Breakdown:
Attendance/
Participation: 10%
Writing Assignments
(three 5-page essays): 50%
Short Response Papers/
Homework Assignments: 10%
End of Term Portfolio
(substantial revisions of three essays including the research essay): 10%
Research Essay (8-10
pages): 20%
The Wilkes University English faculty have endorsed
and agreed upon the following objectives for ENG 101:
1)
Rhetorical Knowledge
By the end of ENG 101, students will have
2)
Critical Thinking, Reading, and Writing
By the end of ENG 101, students will have
3)
Process
By the end of ENG 101, students will have
Plagiarism: To submit someone else’s work as your own is
plagiarism. This includes borrowing work
from other students, professional writers (including the introductory synopses that accompany many of the essays we will
read), or instructors—basically from any
source—without properly acknowledging the author. The proper methods for documenting written
and media sources can be found in any Writer’s Manual. This is extremely
serious. Plagiarized papers earn an F. The university’s recommended penalty for
repeated plagiarism (this means after the first time) is failure for the
course. If you ever have any questions about this, please see me. See handout.
Workshops:
When we are not discussing the texts of professional authors we will devote
much time to the discussion of student writing.
As you can see from the schedule, we will include at least one group
workshop every week. Unlike peer review
sessions (which involve only you and a partner) and focused lab activities,
these workshops will direct the attention of the entire class on particular
issues of writing. These sessions aim to
make the process of writing and revision part of an ongoing discussion
involving all of the members of the class.
By considering the strengths and weaknesses of anonymous student texts
we will have the opportunity to consider various aspects involved in the
writing/revision process. In these
sessions we will often consider many broad issues including: organization,
textual support, textual analysis, the use of quotes, and aesthetic concerns;
but we will also attend to more localized, sentence-level concerns as well
(word choice, sentence structure, and MLA citation). By becoming actively involved in these group
workshops—whether we are discussing your paper or that of a classmate—you will
gain new critical insights and strategies to apply to your own revision
work.
In this course, in other words, the instruction of
writing will principally emerge out of the various moments of difficulty,
challenge, and success presented by particular student works throughout the
semester. The essays chosen for
workshops are not, therefore, meant to be taken simply as models of success or
failure; they should be viewed as representative of the complex sort of writing
issues that many students in the class are grappling with at any given time.
Lab
Work: On lab days, we will meet in the writing lab
(Breiseth 14). Often these meetings will
allow important opportunities for pre-writing, drafting, and responding to
specific writing and revision prompts.
Always bring class texts, hard copy drafts, and a computer disk or drive
to these meetings to facilitate your work.
Essays: This course will require three 5-page essays
responding to course readings, along with a final 8-10 page research essay
(using 5 secondary sources). Essay
grades will be based on the following criteria: 1. the presence of a
recognizable and substantial thesis or central claim; 2. the development of
that claim through adequate textual analysis (including the extensive use of
quotes); 3. the quality of organization throughout the essay; 4. the relative
grammatical and mechanical correctness of prose.
It is important that you turn assignments in on
time. If, however, for some reason you
require an extension, please let me know in advance with an email request that
includes a reason for the extension. Extensions
are granted and denied on a case by case basis.
All papers should be typed, double-spaced, of the required length, with standard 1inch margins (margins like
these), use 12 pt font, Times New Roman, and carefully proofread for spelling and punctuation errors. Additionally, all papers must include the proper parenthetical citation of sources and a
‘works cited’ page (both should follow MLA format).
You will receive both a grade on each draft you turn
in and comments from me. These comments
are intended to help you rethink and develop various aspects of your
papers. Please take advantage of this
feedback—and let me know if you have questions about my comments.
Finally—always keep extra copies of your papers! Save
all the writing you do during the semester.
You can clear your files in December.
Until then, you never know what may prove to be useful during a
revision. If you compose and revise on a
computer, periodically print out (or save on disk) versions of your draft so
that you have a record of its process.
Keep a copy for yourself (either on disk or a hard copy) of all major
assignments handed in to me. In
addition, keep all hard copies
(including response papers) on which you have received comments from me or your
classmates (I will ask for these to be included as part of your final
portfolio).
Response
Papers: Along with
most assigned readings on the syllabus, I have indicated that a short response
paper should be turned in on the day of the discussion. These should be typed (double-spaced) but
informal (not in standard essay form,
with an introduction, etc.) and no more than a page in length. Use these responses as a way to focus your
engagement around particular moments of interest or difficulty (you might
choose a short passage that intrigues you or reminds you of an idea from
another class text; you might want to use some responses to ask questions about
things that seem confusing or difficult; you may even want to attempt to
summarize arguments that you are having difficulty with). I encourage you to use these responses as a
way of testing out and recording questions and comments that could be added to
our group discussions. Since these are
informal assignments, principally intended for you as reading notes, they will
receive only sparse comments from me.
But together, these homework assignments will constitute 10% of your
final grade.
Portfolio: The portfolio will include a 2-page statement
reflecting on the work you have submitted.
The letter should also give an account of the progress you feel you have
made over the course of the semester (Do you feel that you have grown as a
writer and reader? What new strategies
or approaches may have helped in this?) .
With this letter you will include all drafts of your papers (including
response papers) as well as three new drafts that you feel represent your best
work as a writer. All of these materials should be collected in a folder with
pockets. The portfolio is due on the
last day of class, December 4.
Attendance
and Participation:
Because
this class is primarily concerned with the critical discussion of student
texts, it is essential that you attend regularly and participate. Your responses to the writings of other
students are very important—and your own work will benefit from the
observations and comments of others. I
encourage everyone to try to add to our conversations. We’re not looking for ‘right’ answers here,
but serious, critical thought. Participation will, in the end, be a factor
in your grade (10%). Students may
miss no more than two unexcused absences.
Five or more unexcused absences may result in failure of the
course. Note: Even if you do have doctors’ notes for several missed days, you
might be asked to consider withdrawing from the course. In short, if you find yourself missing too
many classes because of illness, a family emergency, or any other unforeseen
circumstance, contact me about it as soon as possible.
Tardiness:
If there is a reason why you might need to be late for class occasionally, let
me know. Otherwise, be on time! If you join us
late you could be marked absent or possibly miss changes made to the schedule
of assignments. But most importantly,
your late entrance will disrupt the work of the class.
Writing
Center: The Writing Center (Breiseth Hall 018,
408-2753) provides free one-on-one instruction to students who seek additional
support in honing their writing and revising skills. You may either call or stop by the writing
center to make an appointment. The
Writing Center offers appointments on a first-come, first-served basis, so you
should plan ahead and reserve times well before your papers are due. The Writing
Center also offers an online tutorial service as well as terrific range of
writing resources for students (see, for example, the “Writing Guides” link)
at: http://www.wilkes.edu/writing/
Your
Feedback: Let me know how the class is going for
you. I would really appreciate any input
you might have to offer in response to class assignments, discussions, the
texts we’re using, or my teaching methods.
What seems to be going well? What
could be improved? Feel free to email me
or leave a note in my box (Kirby 214).
And you are always welcome during my office hours. I look forward to hearing from you.
Course
Schedule (may be revised as needed)
Always
bring your texts to class, even on lab days.
You will need your Little, Brown
Compact Handbook for every writing workshop and lab session.
Mon. 8/25: Introduction and writing assignment.
Wed. 8/27: Bring your texts, Course packet and
anthology, to class, always. We will discuss “Understanding
Argument” and focus our attention on defining the following terms: claim,
support, and warrant. I will introduce
Jefferson’s The Declaration of Independence. In class, we will read The Declaration of
Independence and you should answer the following questions in your reading
notes: What is Jefferson’s claim? What
support does Jefferson use to substantiate his claim (Jefferson uses two types
of support: factual evidence and appeals to his audience)? Give examples of each. How does Jefferson move from support to claim
(warrant)? Who is Jefferson’s intended
audience? To whom is The Declaration
of Independence addressed? Who is
Jefferson speaking for, representing?
Wed. 8/27 Lab: Research: Has the Declaration of Independence been
referenced in the news or political speeches lately? Have the presidential candidates been
referencing and quoting Jefferson? Let's
search the web to find out. What is the
difference between a soft and hard internet source? Which newsgroups, databases, and websites
should you search? Choose one source that mentions the Declaration or discusses
how it has been referenced in the past two years. Write three paragraphs summarizing your
source and discuss whether its significance to a discussion of what the
Declaration means to people in America and around the world, today, or a
discussion of how we respond to or reference the Declaration, today.
Fri. 8/29:
Discussion of the “Declaration of Independence” continued. Homework:
Begin reading Thoreau’s “Resistance
to Civil Government”/“Civil Disobedience” for Wednesday and answer the
following questions: Is Thoreau’s text
still relevant? What, in your opinion,
is his most significant claim? What is
his warrant? How does he support his
claim? What concrete examples of
injustice does he give?
Mon. 9/1: No
class.
Wed. 9/3: Discuss Thoreau
and the reading questions. Handout: Essay #1, due 9/17. I will introduce essay 1. Topic proposal due 9/10.
Topic Proposal
Guidelines
As part of the process work for
each of your major essays, you will submit a topic proposal to me. Your topic
proposal should be between ½ and 1 (typed) page, and it should consider the
following questions:
1. What is your topic? Remember
that it should be focused.
2. What is your working thesis? *Note
that as you write, your thesis may change. This is normal – you can always
tweak your thesis.
3. What are some passages that
support this topic/thesis?
4. What are some questions you
hope to answer in your essay?
5. How do you plan to organize
your essay? Create a rough outline that shows its
organization.
Remember that this may change as your thesis evolves.
Wed. 9/3 Lab: Constructing a proposal and
developing a working thesis. Thesis
workshop.
Fri. 9/5: We’ll discuss Thoreau and the issue of
slavery as well as his controversial support of the abolitionist and terrorist
John Brown. Homework: Read excerpts from William Brown’s slave
narrative in your packet—complete text is available online--and answer the
following discussion questions: How does
Brown represent slavery? Which episode in the narrative stands out most to you
and why?
Mon. 9/8: We will talk about Brown’s
narrative and the Fugitive Slave Act.
Additionally, I will introduce the King texts..
Homework: Read Dr. King’s
“I Have a Dream.” Do the following
writing exercises: Choose a quote from the essay that you find compelling. Quote the passage and explain its
significance. Write a paragraph and discuss the significance of the claim while
noting how King supports that claim. Questions: How does King’s speech revise and elaborate upon
the warrant of Jefferson’s Declaration?
How does King use and deploy Thoreau’s notion of civil
disobedience?
Wed. 9/10: Proposal due. We will discuss King and the
concepts of civil disobedience and creative protest in “I have a Dream.” Homework: Begin reading King’s “Love, Law and Civil
Disobedience.” How does King define
love? What is the principle of the
student movement? Note King’s
discussions of just and unjust laws. How do you know if a law is a just law?
Wed. 9/10 Lab: Go to the MLK papers project website at http://www.stanford.edu/group/King/mlkpapers/
and read chapter two, "Morehouse College," from King's
autobiography. Dr. King reflects on
reading Thoreau as a freshman in college.
Modeling King's text, reflect on your own encounter with Thoreau as a
college student. Email your response to
me: trisha.brady@wilkes.edu.
Fri. 9/12: Class Cancelled. I will be at a conference in Pittsburgh, PA. HOMEWORK: Finish
reading “Love, Law and Civil Disobedience.” Take reading notes as you
read. Mark significant and confusing
passages for discussion. What terms does
King define in this essay? List and define each key term.
Mon. 9/15: We will discuss King’s “Love, Law and Civil
Disobedience.”Homework: Finish paper 1, due Wed. 9/17.
Wed. 9/17
: Submit paper 1. We’ll discuss photographic essays and documentary
photographs. In class, we will explicate images from the Civil Rights Movement
and the 'Man on the box' image from the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. We’ll go over the second paper on visual
texts and contexts, due 9/29. Proposal due 9/24. Homework:
Read excerpts from "The Photographic Essay ..." by Mitchell in your
course packet (on Agee, Barthes, and Said).
Wed. 9/17 Lab: Search for and select a photo (a documentary
photograph) that you would like to write on.
(I suggest finding a suffrage or Civil Rights Movement photo from the
Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division, or a photo from a
newsgroup. Try to write a description of
the image and what it captures. Then, try to explain the meaning of the
photograph, the rhetoric of the photograph.
What does the image say? What
does the photographer want you to see?
How does the photographer direct your focus, your gaze? Can you decipher the image without captions or
surrounding text?
Fri. 9/19: Discuss Mitchell's essay. Finish drafting
Essay #2 and read Stanton’s “Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions.” How
does Stanton revise the claims and warrants of the Declaration? What is her rhetorical strategy? Is it effective?
Mon. 9/22:
Discuss Stanton’s “Declaration …”
HW: Read Chapter 1 from Nancy
Isenberg’s Sex and Citizenship in Antebellum America. Take note of how Isenberg explicates quotes
from Stanton’s “Declaration of Sentiments” as well as how she uses research
sources to give us a historical context for Stanton's text.
Wed. 9/24:
Discuss Stanton and Isenberg. HW: For Friday, Bring your draft copy of
paper two to class on Friday for peer-review.
Also, write 3 paragraphs discussing young women and their role models,
today. Topic is open. Guys, if you have trouble with this one,
consider interviewing a woman. Questions
to get you started: (Girls, do we have female role models?) What types of women are visible in the public
sphere? Do they challenge established
gender-roles? Do we admire any of these women?
Why? What types of women do we encounter in our everyday lives? Do we admire these women? Do they challenge established gender- roles?
Wed. 9/24 Lab: Proposal due. During lab, write a one page letter of self-evaluation to bring to submit
with your second paper. How has your
writing improved? What issues would you
like for me to address in a workshop?
What are your goals for this course?
When you finish the letter, start drafting your three paragraphs on
young women and their role models, today.
Fri. 9/26: Peer-review of paper two. Mini-workshop on paragraphing. Bring your Little,
Brown Compact Handbook.
Mon. 9/29: Paper 2 due. Discussion: young women and their role models,
today. Handout: Paper 3, due 10/24. Paper
3 proposal due 10/20. Read short excerpt from The Republic by
Plato, which is titled “The Allegory of the Cave” and answer the assigned
reading questions, which will help you start drafting your response paper, due 10/13
Wed. 10/1: Discuss Plato's "The Allegory of the Cave" the
reading questions I assigned in class.
Wed. 10/1 Lab: Writing
Prompt on Plato's allegory and the role of the student.
Fri. 10/3: Library tutorial. (K is
10/3 or 10/1; E2 is 9/29 or 10/1)
Mon. 10/6: Discuss
Plato and the pursuit of the good. Write
a 2 page response paper to Plato’s “Allegory ….” Topic is open. Refer back to your reading questions and our
class discussions to help you get started. Due 10/13
Wed. 10/8: Discussion
of Plato's allegory and the matrix of the material world. HW: Begin reading excerpt from Frederick
Douglass’s Narrative of the Life of
Frederick Douglass, an American Slave.
Wed. 10/8
Lab: Work on drafting your response
papers.
Fri. 10/10: Fall Break!
Mon. 10/13: Plato responses due!
Discuss Douglass. How does Douglass
describe the process of his enlightenment?
Does he echo any of the same terms Plato uses? HW:
Read excerpts from Niccolo Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of the Prince.” If Machiavelli read Plato's cave allegory,
whose behavior and qualities would he applaud, the student who leaves and
returns to the cave, or the puppeteers casting shadows on the cave wall? Are the qualities Machiavelli desires in a
prince the same qualities we desire in a leader? We will talk about the importance of
appearances and examine campaign ads by Obama, Paul, McCain, and others in
class.
Wed. 10/15: Discuss Machiavelli
and do the reading questions I assigned in class, which address questions about
means and ends and ask you to compare and contrast King and Machiavelli.
Wed 10/15 Lab: Workshop paper 2: Writing a strong introduction and thesis
paragraph. Bring your Little, Brown Compact Handbook.
Fri. 10/17: Discussion of
Machiavelli and campaign ads continued.
HW: Read Bloom’s “Music.” I will
give you a reading quiz.
Mon. 10/20: Paper 3 proposal due. Discuss Allan Bloom’s “Music.” We’ll
flash to the past to provide a context for Bloom’s text while discussing the
filthy fifteen list and the P.M.R.C. HW: Read
Kathleen Higgins’ “The Music of Our Lives.”
Write a reader response paper, 2 pages in length, to Higgins or Bloom,
due 10/27.
Wed. 10/22: Discuss
Higgins and the soundtracks of our lives.
Analyze Higgins' essay. Is her critique of Bloom successful? Why or why not? Can music form a community?
Wed. 10/22 Lab: Reflect on a music event in your life, a listening
experience or a concert. Does your
experience prove or disprove a claim or claims made by Higgins or Bloom? Zero in on a claim or two by one author and
use your personal experience to support or critique his or her claims about
music and youth culture. Email me your
freewrites at the end of class.
Fri.: 10/24: Paper 3 due! We
will discuss our freewrites and listen to and explicate songs, T.B.A. in class. HW: Read “The Imaginative Mind and the
Role of the Listener” by Aaron Copland.
Why does Copland privilege the responses of the amateur listener? Writing and listening exercise: listen to a song and write a journal style
response. Note the time of day, your
mood, and comment on your surroundings.
Write down all of your observations about the musical text and your
emotional and physical responses to the music after you listen to the
song. (If you are not sure about how to
talk about the musical text, look at the lay terms Copland uses at the close of
his text. These adjectives are common to
all amateur listeners.) Bring this
writing exercise to class.
Mon. 10/27: Responses due. Handout paper 4, due 11/14. Proposal due 11/13. We’ll discuss Copland and your
listening experiences. Do our
experiences of music prove or disprove Copland's claims? HW: Read Kurt Cobain’s essay “Music as
Energy” in your course packet. Do you
agree or disagree with Cobain's claims about music?
Wed.
10/29: Discuss
Cobain. Listen to and explicate selected
Nirvana lyrics. HW: Read excerpt from Tricia Rose's Black Noise, “‘All Aboard
the Night Train’ Flow, Layering, and Rupture in Post-industrial New York.” What terms does she introduce and define?
Wed.
10/29 Lab: Revision
Workshop: adding new research sources to an essay. Bring your Little,
Brown Compact Handbook!
Fri.
10/31: Discuss
Rose. Homework:
start reading the second excerpt from Tricia Rose’s Black Noise,
“Prophets of Rage.” What terms does she
introduce and define? How does she
structure her argument in this chapter?
In your reading notes, create an outline of her argument.
Mon.
11/3/: Proposal
due. We will discuss Rose’s claims and examine the way she analyzes and
explicates musical texts to support her claims about hip hop and rap.
Wed. 11/5: Rose discussion continued.
Hip-hop
music as creative protest: Can we extend
Rose’s claims to other genres of music? Homework: Select a
revision of a paper you have been working on and bring it in for peer review on
Fri.
Wed.
11/5 Lab: Follow my thread and respond to the writing prompt I will post to the
Discussion board: The Sound of Generation Y.
Fri.
11/7: Bring
your Little, Brown Compact Handbook! Peer review of a revision. Handout: Revision Research
Paper Outline, assignment.
Mon. 11/10: The rhetoric of the next
President of the United States. In-class text/speech handout.
Wed. 11/12: The
music of an election.
Revision Research Paper Proposal and Tentative Thesis Statement Assignment, due
Wed. 11/12. Post to Discussion board, for this class. I'll explain how to do
this.)
The paper proposal consists of an
introduction to your issue and an explanation of the position you intend to
take on this issue in your paper. The proposal consists of two paragraphs and a
tentative thesis statement:
In your first
paragraph,
introduce your issue. Give a rough background of the issue you intend to
address, or an explanation of a conflict, or the reasons for tension between
two groups; whatever suits your issue best. DO NOT express any opinions in this
paragraph.
In the second
paragraph,
explain your position on your issue. State where you stand on the situation you
have just explained, and give your opinion about the issue you have raised.
Then, write a tentative thesis
statement that incorporates the core information of the two proposal
paragraphs: what your issue is and the
position on that issue you are going to argue for in your paper.
Fri. 11/14: Paper 4 due.
Workshop: Drafting the Research essay: revising and extending a previous
paper. Bring the Little,
Brown Compact Handbook!
Mon. 11/17: Bring your Little,
Brown Compact Handbook. MLA citation and grammar workshop: common
errors.
Wed. 11/19: Workshop:
adding new sources and content to your paper.
Wed. 11/19 Lab: Use keywords (and invent new ones) to research
your topic at Wilkes' library web pages. Search Project Muse and JSTOR. Browse and quickly read the texts you
find. Choose the two most relevant sources
and email your search results to yourself.
Fri. 11/21: Revision Workshop.
Mon. 11/24: Revision
Workshop.
Wed.: 11/26: Thanksgiving Break.
Fri. 11/28: Thanksgiving Break.
Mon. 12/1: Writing about a scene from a film. Film clips from Iron Jawed
Angels and The Matrix
Wed. 12/3: Writing about a scene from a documentary. Film
clip: footage of King's "I Have a Dream" speech and the March on
Washington.
Wed. 12/3 Lab: Some
Guidelines for Reading Essays and Developing Arguments from Texts, excerpted
from Guidelines for Reading and Arguing
By Stephanie Hawkins
As you begin the process of developing
your research paper, you'll encounter many essays written in academic or
specialized discourse. In many instances
the topic will be a sensitive one, or one that generates many conflicting
opinions. You may find that you hate the way a certain writer uses language, or
you may disagree violently with the position of the writer. It's important to
note the intellectual or emotional conflicts you feel as you read these texts,
since these feelings will generate your own opinions and develop into a thesis
for your own argument. It's important, also, not to let your dislike (or even
your enthusiasm) for a particular source prevent you from looking at the source
objectively and from trying to understand it on its own terms. As readers of
academic discourse, a discourse that at times may feel alien to our own ways of
speaking or writing or thinking, it's essential that we develop ways of
engaging more fully with what the writer is trying to say. Other
times-especially those times when we find ourselves completely "turned
off" by what the writer is saying and how the writer is saying it-we need
to disengage from the text and look at it objectively.
Think about academic discourse as a conversation. Your sources, whether
books or articles, are pieces of writing in which a variety of people speak at
once. As a writer you too are going to engage in the conversation-at first you
may feel isolated by the advanced language or intimidating tone because this is
all new. But if you think of each source as a conversation, containing a
variety of different voices discussing and debating a specific issue or topic,
the task will feel less daunting.
Lab
assignment:
The following are suggestions to help you become a part of the
conversation and to help you use sources to create a conversation of your own.
Choose a source or a primary text you are using in your paper and do the
following:
Ask yourself what it is about a certain passage that moves you or elicits
an emotional response. Then, identify
language, tone, or the ideas that arouses the strong feeling.
In your journal or notes, jot down the passage (direct quote, paraphrase
or summary) and then next to it write down the feelings, ideas or questions
that it generates.
Now, try to write a paragraph about the passage and explain how it uses
emotional appeals to engage the reader.
When you're having difficulty getting interested in the source try the
following:
Find one place, a quote, an idea that seems related to your topic of
interest. Jot it in your notebook or journal and try to get in touch with what
that idea might be saying to you about how you currently think about your own
topic. How can the idea lead you into a different way of thinking about your
topic? If that writer were with you and could talk to you, what would you say?
What would you ask? What would you want her/him to explain or develop?
Think about what other sources you have read might say to that source.
Put different sources in "conversation" with each other. (We talked
earlier about what Dr. King might say to Thoreau about non-violent protest, and
about what Bloom might say to Higgins about rock music.) Try to create a
dialogue, using Plato's model. Literally,
put two sources or voices in conversation with each other and see what
happens. Please post these to the
discussion board. And yes, have some fun
with this assignment.
Fri. 12/5: Strategies for proof-reading and polishing your prose. MLA citation workshop. Bring your
Little, Brown Compact Handbook!
Mon. 12/8: Portfolios
due in class. You must submit your
portfolio in person, to me, in class.
Behavioral Expectations in the Classroom
Classroom "etiquette" expectations
should include:
Cell phones must be turned off or set to vibrate on the lowest setting. We should not hear a cell vibrating in a
purse, bag, pocket., etc., during class.
Laptops must be stowed.
You will not need your laptop in class and are not permitted to use it
during class.