SOPHISTICATED
INVESTIGATION
Much
reported controversy surrounds the public health agencies and their handling of
investigation into the disease Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. Surely the most advanced nations with
legions of medical scientists would be motivated to meet the challenge and
discover the cause of an epidemic striking down its citizens, which leaves
large numbers permanently disabled. Yet
the response of the public health agencies has caused particular
skepticism. This has raised many
questions.
Now
this question may sound very odd, but consider:
How would you Disguise a Disease ?
I
doubt there could be too many ways . . .
But if that were your intent, Let's see, where would you start --
Camouflage! First
declare it is a New illness. (Brilliant!)
Declare that there is no epidemic! (Tremendous) Spread the word it is not serious.
(Spectacular!!!) Create a smokescreen
by using a vague definition so that you can mix in many non-cases, and thus
claim it is very hard to identify; then
Cover
your tracks! Give the Disguised Disease a variety of New names.
(Yes, a trivial absurd name, splendid!)
Disassociate it from its previous established name, research, case
studies, descriptions and diagnostic ICD classification. (Fantastic) Lets see
what else could we do to disguise a disease
Create
Confusion! We could tell Drs that this disease is “mysterious”
and that there is no need to investigate, “Don't do any testing” (you won't
find anything) Its a Mystery.
What
else... Oh, yeah, Confuse some more, Rewrite the definition every few years.
While expanding the inclusion of non-cases and making the whole field more
frustrated.
My
god, that should be enough? Wait, also
we could use the stall tactic. You
know, wait several months before allowing Drs to even consider the vague
criteria, surely by that time there won't be much of the originating virus left
to find. Once the acute phase and
fevers are gone, so will most of the evidence.
Say,
how about some icing on the cake? Well,
how about a little appeasement for the patients. (Yes, we'll need to keep them
confused)
We
could for example tell them that we are taking this illness seriously. We could even declare that we are
recognizing it as a Priority One illness.
But then not do any significant research and use any funds for other
projects. We could make it the least
funded disease in America, who would care we have already spread the word that
its not serious and hinted that it may be a mood disorder, you know
“neuroendocrine”.
We
could tell patients that we value their input and then ignore their
concerns. We could establish important
sounding committees. Ask them to
participate in subcommittees that would hold things in place for a couple of
years, then do it again every few years.
If
all else is not enough we could bury it further under an umbrella of uncertain
conditions.
Does
the above sound plausible. Oh, C'mon -
We'd never get away with it. TOO OUTRAGEOUS !
(They
would hang us if they caught on. We
would need the support from everybody all the way to the top to keep this
going. Heck we got that years ago, back when we were denying AIDS, remember)
- - - - - - - An alternate approach
- - - - - - -
Now,
if you wanted to seriously INVESTIGATE this disease and not cover it up but
search for a cure? Then, an alternate
approach will be needed: To Discover, Study, Diagnose, Treat and Cure.
I
would think the legitimate process is you find the genuine article. Use the strict criteria that give you the –
Definitely seriously ill patients.
Immediately
go to the archives and learn from the experience of those that have worked on
this in the past, study and utilize the wealth left to you by your predecessors. This history will have many clues and
patterns as to origins and natural course.
Focus
major investigations at the origins, when the disease is in its beginning
stages and zero in on any localities where an outbreak may be underway. This process may uncover the defining
characteristics, which can signal the onset of this disease, what exposures may
be in common. This can assist discover
the causes or prevention.
Identify
it. Study it. Examine it. Investigate
it from every angle, with every diagnostic technology available until there is
a clear understanding of what it is.
Uncover what causes the disease state.
Once this is accomplished then you can proceed to determine who has this
disease and who does not.
What
are its boundaries? What is the range
of severity? Require the registry of
every death of these patients.
Investigate
and qualify what the sequelae are, the additional conditions that develop over
time. What are the factors that define
the chronic disease state?
What
is the range of pathology? What factors
may cause the diversity of pathology in different individuals? It is surely a large area of investigation
and may require new perspectives on disease. And a new diagnostic test.
However,
I believe Dr Ramsay accomplished the first step in the process. He developed a clinical description whereby
certain definite cases can be identified.
And recent research appears to be pointing the way with important
discoveries in immunology, metabolism and neurology.
Nonetheless,
even if you do not have a Nobel prize, how would You proceed? (send your answers to: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ )
Does
this sum up the dichotomy between logic and reality and where we are? Can this be all an accident of modern
science? Are we to believe that all
the government scientists are just naive?
Sophisticated
Investigation: what would be the result?
Should
Sherlock Holmes and Colombo require years of appraisal of the evidence? How many cigars and pouches before revealing
questions would be asked?
Sophisticated Investigation, or How to
Disguise a Disease
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This
essay is dedicated to the thousands that have died from Myalgic
Encephalomyelitis since the acts of malfeasance by the public health agencies
in 1988. As well as the hundreds of
thousands that have contracted this debilitating condition which has been
spreading unchecked and ignored. There are now millions worldwide and the
numbers are growing.
Please distribute
Quintero 2002