The Dartnel

 

May 31, 2007

All Things All the Time
 

Welcome back.  We are so happy you've decided to spend some time with us.  Pull up a chair and relax.  You're welcome to stay as long as you want.

 

First things first.  Why do people say "first things first"?  Has anybody in the history of humankind ever held off on first things 'til the last?  Has anybody waited until they were in the middle of a conversation before going with their "first thing"?  More importantly, does anybody start off with the middle thing first?  (I would have gone with the last thing first, but sometimes there's only one thing that needs saying, so technically, you could have "last things first".)  Who comes up with some of these sayings, anyway?

 

Second things second.  (Boy, am I going to milk this!)  As many of you know, I have a follicle-growing problem.  I just can't seem to grow enough of it!  Now, I am forced to dwell on some of the benefits of having an expanded forehead.  For one, you don't have to spend as much on hair care products!  I mean, why buy shampoo if you don't have any use for it?  There's also a rumor going about that men who have extra scalp visible are more attractive to the womenfolk.  I think it has something to do with the womenfolk being able to check their makeup and hair by using the reflective surface as a mirror!!!  (Great, now I've depressed myself...)

 

Third things third.  I am seriously considering getting contact lenses.  I have to get my eyes checked, and I know for a fact that they've gotten weaker.  Even with my glasses on, my right eye tends to be a blur.  Besides, my lenses are all scratched up.  Unfortunately for me, I've been instructed on how to train myself for wearing contacts.  You hold your eye open and touch your eyeball with your finger without blinking.  Beautiful.  On the upside, the contacts will give me back my peripheral vision, so I'd be able to see you if you're making snide comments about me off to my side.  Hmmm... maybe I should stick to glasses after all!

 

Last things last.  Clean up your mess when you leave.

 

Darrell

 

May 25, 2007

Weddings, DIM Style
 

DIM Report 74656
Sure Signs You're At a Bad Wedding

 

1.     The ushers are dressed as Disney characters.

2.     Tickets for admission start at $20; $200 for reserved seating.

3.     The pastor leads off by saying, "Everybody's getting married; that's great..." and you know that he doesn't mean it.

4.     The best man is the groom's divorce attorney.

5.     I'm in it!

6.     The bride breaks into uncontrollable laughter when the pastor says "for as long as you both shall live".

7.     The song sung is The Mississippi Squirrel Revival.

8.     The pastor forgets to have the newly married couple kiss.  (Not that I've seen that happen...)

9.     Instead of birdseed, you throw polysulfuric acid at the newlyweds.

10. The wedding reception will be held at Kentucky Fried Chicken, and you have to pay for your own food!

 

May 22, 2007

The Number 47
 

Okay, folks, bear with me here; this may be one of my sillier blog entries ever!

 

My favorite number just might be the number 47.  Yes, I know, odd choice.  It's symbolic.  It's the number of hairs left on my forehead!!!  (Well, that makes 47 bald jokes this year alone.)  Actually, let me explain while at the same time displaying my nerdiness.  If you've ever watched an episode of Star Trek, especially later The Next Generation episodes, the number 47 usually shows up somewhere, somehow.  I wasn't even aware of this until I listened to the commentary of Star Trek: Generations, which proves that I have way too much spare time.  The writers of the film admitted to inserting 47 into everything they wrote.  Examples: Scotty beams aboard 47 people, Data gives an arrival time of 47 minutes.

 

Folks, there are other occurrences of the number 47.  It just seems to pop up more often than random chance would indicate.  Let me give you some examples:

 

1.     Hello, Dolly! – Dolly Levi is trying to sell Horace Vandergelder on a woman, named Ernestine Money.  The woman, by the way, is a flat-out lie, but that's not important to my point.  She quotes Ms. Money's waist size at 47, "that's with the money belt."

2.     $847.63 - cash register reading when Maggie gets scanned at opening credits of The Simpsons.

3.     47 acres on movie Dog's Best Friend.

4.     Rolaids absorbs 47 times its weight in excess acid.

5.     There are 47 letters in the dedication plaque on Mudd-Blaisdell Hall, which was completed in 1947.

6.     The Declaration of Independence consists of 47 sentences.

7.     The New Testament credits Jesus with 47 miracles.

 

Aside from the first example, I actually found these just now on a website dedicated to the number 47: the 47 Society, http://www.47.net/47society.

 

Okay, obviously I have way too much time on my hands.  Oh, well, at least I thought it was interesting.  Just do me a favor.  Keep a lookout for the number 47.

 

EDIT 5/22/07:  Another interesting tidbit relating to the above, which I somehow failed to include when composing this masterpiece.  In fact, it's the main reason I was inspired to write this drivel.  (Um, Darrell, does that make this Dartnel entry genius or idiotic?  We need to know!)

 

Last week, 47 people visited Dartnel (Not-So-)Lite!

 

Darrell

 

May 15, 2007

Much Ado 'Bout a Movie
 

Yesterday, I read a news article.  A substitute teacher elected to show Brokeback Mountain to a sixth-grade class.  One of the young ladies in the class didn't much care for the movie.  Now her grandparents are suing the school where the movie was shown, claiming that their aforementioned granddaughter suffered "psychological distress," or wording amounting to such.  They want half a million dollars in punitive damages.

 

First off, I hope that the substitute teacher is fired, loses her teaching license, and is not allowed to teach anywhere ever again.  I'd feel the same way if that teacher showed Gladiator, for instance.  (Actually, a caveat here: We did watch Gladiator in a college class once.  It was Western Civ, and the movie was relevant to the course.  Of course, it was also a college setting.  Back to our regular programming.)

 

A teacher is supposed to teach, even if he or she is merely a substitute.  I substitute teach a children's Sunday School class at church, and I know that sometimes kids won't listen to their substitute, no matter what.  Still, I make an attempt to teach the material as well as I can.  Maybe, just maybe, the kids will get something out of the lesson.  From what I read, this teacher didn't make the effort.  She even allegedly told the kids not to tell that they were watching a movie, so she evidently knew that what she was doing was wrong.

 

My second point is this: Where do these grandparents get off?  Yes, showing the movie was wrong, and yes, the teacher should be disciplined.  Having said that, these grandparents look like they're in it for the money.  They're not suing the substitute teacher; they're suing the school.  It's kind of like suing Wal Mart for $750,000 when your cashier curses you out in front of your children.  Of course, that last one would never happen (although with the way we're going...).  The only way these grandparents could win this lawsuit, it seems to me, would be to prove that the school knew about the movie showing.  Yes, I know, there are legal chicaneries that could be used, but still...

 

Last point, I promise.  This article allowed people to voice their opinions.  Some were with the grandparents (sue the school), some feel the way I do, and some didn't see anything wrong with showing the movie in the first place.  However, reading the vitriolic acid that some of these people spewed really bothered me.  There was so much hate in some of the opinions that it made me ashamed.  We should all be entitled to our opinions, but we should also treat those who don't share our views with respect.  I know a lot of you don't agree with what I've written in this blog entry alone.  Hey, that's fine; leave me a comment, and be civil about why you disagree with me.

 

We should be a group of people who can have intelligent discourses without blowing up whenever somebody questions our beliefs.  You want to do that, you want to get angry and throw a fit whenever you don't get your way, run for Congress!  That's where you belong!  (I felt a little levity was called for at this point.)

 

Thanks as always for your patronage.

 

Darrell

 

May 6, 2007

Thank You, Troops
 

Sometimes I worry about society.  It recently came to my attention that there is a MySpace group called... Well, I'm not exactly comfortable mentioning its name.  Suffice to say, judging from the group's name, they seem to be into bashing our armed forces.

I've been thinking a lot recently about our troops and what they're going through, especially those in Iraq.  They're fighting an unpopular war, putting their lives on the line every day to protect innocent people from those whose most pressing concern is trying to kill as many people as they can, using whatever means necessary.  Strike out the word "unpopular," and that last sentence describes Afghanistan pretty well.

You know, I can understand why people are against what's going on in Iraq.  Let's face it; it looks pretty bad over there.  However, just because you might be against the war doesn't mean that you're against the troops.  They deserve our support and our respect, even if we disagree with why they're over there.  They definitely
DON'T need to be belittled or called four-letter words by their fellow citizens.

Please think about what our troops have sacrificed for their duty.

Darrell

 

May 4, 2007

1,000 People Can't All Be Wrong... Can They?
 

Ladies and gentlemen, here's an important announcement...

 

Dartnel Lite Voted Most Wasteful of Web Spaces!!!

 

(If you didn't know that was coming, you must be new here.)

 

Here's the real announcement...

 

Dartnel Lite Passes 1,000 Mark!!!

 

Geez, I kinda liked the first one better; didn't you?  (Yes, I know; you can't compound a statement with a question.)

 

I guess I owe all of you a write-up on Oklahoma!  I can't tell you how many people have come up to me and told me how much they enjoyed the show!  Makes me wonder...  In Charlie & the Chocolate Factory, I had a lead role, and few people told me how good that show was.  In Oklahoma!, I had a bit role, and people can't stop telling me how good the show was!  In all fairness (mostly to me), I'm sure I've simply run into more people who saw Oklahoma! than saw C&tCF.

 

Well, now it's performance withdrawal for me.  For the first time in three months, I'm not in rehearsal for a stage performance.  Too bad.  I become a totally different person on stage, unless you believe for a moment that I'm either (1) an insane chocolate maker or (2) a riot-starting federal marshal.  Actually, what I'll miss most about the performances is the rehearsals themselves.  Don't tell anyone, but that's the most fun for me, figuring out how I'm going to play a character, seeing the others run through their lines, staging, joking about with cast mates, and generally having a great time.  That's what I miss the most.

 

That's it for me.  I'll talk with you later.

 

Darrell

 

 

Return to Journal Index

 

Return to Home