by John Clarke, Provincial Organizer, Ontario Coalition Against Poverty
On October 7, pre-trial motions began in my second jury trial based
on charges that were laid against me following a police attack on a
homeless march to the Ontario Legislature on June 15 of 2000. It is
alleged by the Crown Attorney's Office that I "counselled participation
in
riot on that day as well as the assaulting of police officers". If
convicted, I face a maximum jail term of seven years.
In the summer of 2000, the Ontario Coalition Against Poverty (OCAP)
sought to address the crisis of homelessness in Toronto and the vicious
neo
liberal policies of the ruling Ontario Conservative Party. The means
we
employed was a March to the Legislative Assembly that featured a demand
that a delegation of women and men affected by homelessness be allowed
to
address that body. The Government rebuffed our delegation and a
provocative and brutal police operation was set in motion that involved
repeated baton charges by riot clad cops and the use of a mounted units
to
clear the Legislative grounds. This reckless action sparked a major
confrontation with the 1,5000 demonstrators that became known in the
media
as the 'Queen's Park Riot'.
Over forty people were charged by the police at the event or in the
weeks following it. Three OCAP members, Stefan Pilipa, Gaetan Heroux
and
myself, were singled out as 'leaders' of the March and faced a Jury
trial
as alleged organizers of a 'planned riot'. It was a return to the use
of
the antiquated and reactionary 'public order' provisions of the
Canadian
Criminal Code that have scarcely been used since the political show
trials
of unemployed and trade union leaders in the 1930s. Now, as in the
days of
the Depression, this kind of repression is designed to silence
opposition
and stifle dissent.
Far from OCAP being intimidated or derailed, however, the legal
vendetta of the State has brought us hugely increased support and
brought
forward a whole new layer of capable and dedicated activists. Jailings
and
harsh bail conditions have only made us more determined. The attempt
to
criminalize and isolate us has not only failed. It has proven
counterproductive.
In January of this year, the first Jury trial got underway. The
Crown had assumed that over twenty police witnesses, graphic footage of
the
confrontation and a set of lurid theories about the plans we had for
the
day, would automatically convince a jury to convict. As it turned out,
the
Jury reflected the political polarization of Ontario society and became
hopelessly deadlocked. A mistrial was declared on May 11. Our victory
was
especially galling to the Crown because we engaged in no cringing
apologetics but ran a principled defence in which we presented our
militant
politics clearly before the Court.
On June 18, the Crown announced that it would not proceed with the
charges against Gaetan and Stefan but that I would face a second trial.
Despite the uncertainty they must feel about the outcome, the
authorities
have decided that a ritual of retribution can't be dispensed with.
We go into this second trial with a huge amount of confidence. It
is highly likely that another legal victory can be obtained but, in the
event that they get their conviction, we shall still win the political
battle. There is a huge amount of support and solidarity and any
significant jail term will only fuel our struggle.
The present court case flows from OCAP's efforts to point the way
forward in the fight against capitalism's attempt to solve its crisis
at
the expense of working people and the poor. We have long argued that
futile displays of moral indignation and token protests will not
suffice.
We must rediscover the kind of militant mass action that gave birth to
the
Labour Movement and established a body of social rights for working
people. We must, as OCAP has expressed it, 'fight to win'.
The Labour leaders in Ontario shied away from decisive action
against the Conservative Government and the resulting undermining of
working class rights and living standards was appalling. The
discredited
Tories have now been replaced by a Liberal Government that has been
elected
on the basis of a cynical pretence that it represents 'change' for the
population of this Province. Should a new, Liberal Attorney General
decide
to proceed with the legal persecution of OCAP, it will be a very
telling
indication of just how bogus the climate of 'change' in Ontario
actually is.
We fight in the workplaces and in the streets. Sometimes the fight
has to be a defensive one in a courtroom. However, in our immediate
struggle to win concessions and in our coming battle to transform
society,
change will be won through our organization and strength as working
people.
|