Dear Editor:

     News Editors, Reporters, Directors, Managers:
     Trust the news media? No, I dont think so.
     A truly sad situation it has become over the decades. A downward spirial into all that is wrong with passing along useless information to the people.
     The news media has become an entity unto itself, a selfish one which believes its own hype and spin about itself. It's plainly obvious with all the self promotions about its own news coverage and service to the people. So much self center focus that it is unaware of the people tuning and turning away from the news.
     The people are weary.
     Some, though, have begun to make sport of the news, listening, reading, just to figure out how the news media weaselled out of reporting the truth, the whole truth, or otherwise misleading the people. "It is possible, it may, more people, ...," use enough qualifiers and lies become truth, but that becomes only technocially so. "Most all things are possible, lots of things may, more implies 50.00001%, usually with plus/minus 3% error." Ha, what a joke the news media has become.
     The news media is obsessed with death, destruction, disaster and disease. They travel to the ends of the earth to find it and report it. Camera operators, they close in on a grieving mother's face rather than let a family suffer their loss in private. If the local news can't find it locally then someother fatal accident half a world away will do.
     The news media is obsessed with sex, private lives of politicians, or even private citizens, it makes no diff to them, as long as it fullfills their own lust for reporting sex, scandalious or not. Famous people have no private lives, or so believe the reporters. The local news reporters are locally famous so maybe they should deny themselves their own private sex life. Ha, probablity of that is nill.
     The news media believes the people to be ignorant, simple minded and easily mislead. Maybe it's brainwashing they seek to do. Three, four or five times a day, day after day, the same news stories reported seemingly endlessly, yes, that's a basic brainwashing tactic.
     Just who, or is it what, put the thought of killing into little kids' minds? News media reporting of similiar, previous events is more probable than violence in video games, movies or television shows. Kids do know the diff between make believe and reality you know.
     Make the parents responsible for their children's actions? Perhaps they should be, let them teach the children how the news media preys on young minds. And I do mean prey.
     Imagine how quickly the news media would report about an individual obsessed with violence, death, disease, sex stalking young prey near a school. Then imagine why they do not report on themselves.
     "It is a terrible thing to waste a mind," yet that is what the news media does. It is a horrific thing to waste a whole society as well, yet the news media has done and does that also.
     Batter a child with negativism and the child becomes what is taught. "You're dumb, you're stupid, you're clumsy, you're bad, you're evil, ...," ad infinitum, ad nausium. Batter a society with negativism and the society becomes what is taught. "Violence, killing, death, war, disease, destruction, cancer, corruption, rape, wild teens, sex, aids, bombings, school shootings, madness, ..., " ad infinitum, ad nausium.
     The proof is out there in history, check it out for your selves. I really don't expect you to believe what I would quote any more than I believe what you report.
     {"Hussle your own damn funding and do your own damn research," sneered one science type to another.}
     Plot the crime statistics from 1950 to now and compare with the number of households with televisions (include the number of televisions in households too, more tvs in a house implies more viewing). The period from 1963 to 1973 is most interesting.
     True there are other factors at work, in fact all factors come into play, it's seldom just one thing that influences individuals or society. Yet there it is in the plots, a genuine correlation between television use and crime.
     It's not only crime either, compare the mindset of the people about society, compare the United States mindset with other countries, compare your own history of reporting with history itself.
     Make someone responsible for the bad things that happen in the world? Ha, what a joke. The people's view of the world is through the eyes and mouths of the news media and the news media will never report on its own responsibility.

Have a great day!
Jerry Hughes

Dear Editor:

     That flag thing, again. No matter how much I've studied this issue I find myself thinking of more than just whether or not that flag should stay or go. It's mostly thinking about the other issues and principles being invoked, either explictly or implictly, and not being discussed or wrote about.

     What that battle flag means reduces one principle, one that is more fundamental than it just meaning different things to different people. That flag, along with the other two flags as well as symbols in general, represents whatever the person looking at it wants it to represent. The person doing the viewing puts their own meaning there. This comes from a principle a wiseman friend taught me in recent years. "We all find exactly what we look for, choose wisely what you seek." Also in this principle is implied "we don't find what we don't want to find" and "we sometimes look for things that are not really there." So the "choose wisely what you seek" part is important.

     Given the above principle this Conferderate battle flag issue becomes subjective. What it represents, (good, bad, both or neither), depends on the individuals who look at it. Such subjective problems have no proper solution. So in the end whether or not the flag stays or goes makes little difference for the reasons given for its removal. Those who see the offensiveness in the symbol will continue to see that where ever the symbol is displayed. The same applies to others who see their own meanings in a symbol.

     So, what's the real issue and controversy? The flag's meaning? A conflict between individuals and groups differences in a symbol's meaning? An implied sovereignty? If one group is offended by it, it should be hidden away? A representation of an era of slavery and war? Perhaps it's become the whole issue and controversy, in total, itself. Perhaps it's some of those other issues and principles not being discussed or talked about.

     The "teach your children well" principle. From a placard, Your Heritage is My Slavery, at the ML King day rally there's "Judge each other by what your ancestors did mine." From incidents of students being suspended from school for wearing the rebel flag emblem there's "Be ashamed of your heritage." From the boycott there's "Do what we want or else." From the extremes of the opposing political groups there's "Never give an inch, no compromise." From the meaning of flags and symbols there's "Judge each other by one's own interperation of what another's symbol means." From flying that Federal flag there's "Don't see what the real sovereignty of the United States did to the Native American culture and peoples." From ripping off and ill using another's good symbol there's, "Trash the good by using it for bad purposes."

     All in all this flag issue is not developing into a very pretty picture. Neither is this generation's legacy for some future generation's heritage. Has anyone's, any generation's, heritage been without blemish? Has any symbol been wholely perfect in it's meaning and use?

     Those of us who are of European descent are just as likely to find both oppessors and oppressed in our heritage as any other group in the world. Look up "slavery" in the Encyclopedia Britannica and you'll find discussion of indentured servitude, serfdom, feudalism, peonage, peasantry, debt bondage. They're all grouped as "forced labor." Look through European history and you'll find Saxons vs Normans, English vs Irish, Muslim vs Christain, Inquistions, Arabain vs European, Crusades, Dutch slave traders, Spanish colonialism and most any other combination of one ethnic group vs another.

     The "teach your children well" principle. Not only do some see the bad to teach in history but it seems we all just badly teach history as well as create some future generation's bad history.

     Does the flag stay or go? Given the present circumstances of the issue and controversy, can either action be taken without serious ramification to some other principles? Probably not.

     There is a partial solution to subjective problems though, it's within each of us. It's in that important, "choose wisely what you seek," part. We should not look for hate, racism or offensiveness in symbols because such things are not there. They're in the individuals who exhibit such traits in their character and are more likely just ill-using someone else's good symbols. Neither should we hide from our seeking other injustices done under the sovereignty of another flag. We should accept history for whatever all of history has to teach. We should seek to distinguish what is good in a symbol from the bad things done in the name of that symbol least we continue to yield up those symbols to those who do bad things. We should not seek to force our perspective of a symbol upon others because other's have their own perspective. And most importantly we should choose very wisely what we teach our children.

Leave a Great Future!
Jerry Hughes

ThoughtSmithing 1999.
© jwhughes 1999