Dip 926 – Stab!

Non-blind maps (zipped powerpoint file)

Non-blind orders

Final map

Click on the hyperlinked names for the EOG

Players

 

Name

Nation

GM:

Stephen Worthy

 

Players:

Jorge Cisneros

Germany

 

Erlend Janbu

France

 

Charlie Clarke

Russia

 

Steph Mabie

Austria

 

Raymond Watts

Turkey

 

Alex Amann

Italy

 

Karl Lyons

England

EOG Statements

My EOG

First of all my thanks and congratulations to all players for playing all the way through – a first in my cat23 experience. This is the third game I’ve started as a GM, but the first to finish. It has proved by far the most interesting, being able to watch the action without the blindness of the players. I hope to do a few more variants of this ilk when real life commitments ease. Now to the game…

With builds anywhere in players’ own territories, the first season was the most crucial. It gave the more canny players the opportunity to steal a march on their less aware rivals. Russia had a natural advantage in being able to grab Norway and Sweden, and Charlie exploited that while playing a cautious opening down south.

England generally gets hammered in such variants for exactly that reason – his neighbours have first dibs on all accessible neutrals and he’s doomed unless a neighbour makes a mistake. None did – Karl was unlucky, although I’d have liked to have seen him doing the unexpected and heading for Iberia. I suspect Stab! would be fairer if England could build in the North Sea in Winter 1900 as has been suggested before.

Italy and Turkey limited themselves by building only in their own supply centres. Turkey’s relative success came mostly because Italy and Austria got entangled. It was 1904 before Italy vacated Austria’s home centres and by then Raymond already had Naples. Austria himself had started logically, manoeuvring to take Rumania and Serbia, but if an Italian ruler has his heart set on attacking Austria there is nothing the latter can do to avoid a damaging stalemate. Thereafter Steph appeared to be hamstrung by Austria’s position – surrounded by neighbours, with little scope to keep his troop movements secret.

Germany had a solid start, but lost out because Charlie used the fog of war more adeptly than him. Jorge piled into France, a dangerous prospect given comparable strength, but kept no rear guard up, letting Russia in the back door. This gave Charlie the platform on which to build his empire.

France left few gaps in his defence, but was weakened by leaving Portugal when he thought he had taken it. He was then dealt a masterful blow by Russia, whose Fleet waited undetected in the North Atlantic Ocean for a year before swooping on Liverpool, soon followed by another unexpected fleet attack on Edinburgh. He looked as if he would beat off the Russian attack at first, but the fleeing English fleet and Turkey’s marauders snatched his unguarded centres and finished him off.

In my opinion, Russia’s victory was well-deserved – his use of the variant rules far surpassed his opponents’. But he was helped to a great extent by Turkey’s opportunism. Russia was up to 12 centres in 1907 when Raymond took Spain from France and 14 in 1908 when he took Portugal. This speculative play undermined France’s defences against Russia and practically handed the solo to Russia. His own attack on Russia then was too little too late. Thanks everyone – any comments welcome.

Alex’s EOG

I wish I had read the rules closer before I sent in my first moves. I misunderstood the initial building rules: I thought we could decide what units to build, but that they had to still be in our supply centers. It wasn't until after that I found out that it could be in any home territories. Had I known this, I most likely would have started with A Pie, F Rom, and F Nap, and gone for west at the beginning while holding the Mediterranean to prevent the Turk from coming too close. But since I started with an Austrian attack, it was difficult to change without sacrificing great position. When in 1903 or 1904 I realized that Russia was getting large, I sent an army up to pester him, to possibly make him slow down his advance a bit. Unfortunately, that happened to be the same time that Turkey invaded and I was forced to disband the army in Russia in order to reclaim my territory at home. My goal by that time was to reclaim all of mainland Italy by the time Russia won (I knew that he would by that time...I voted yes on the solo victory proposed, whenever that was). I could have done it one year, but I stupidly vacated Rome in a fall season while Turkey still owned it, and thus was stuck for a couple more years. But I did finally acheive my goal, taking Rome back from the Turk for the second or third time in 1911.

Thanks for this game. It was a lot of fun. I created an Excel spreadsheet with ownership of supply centers each year, following closely of the moves reported. Looking through the actual results and what I had, I wasn't too far off. I know I shouldn't be mentioning it to everyone now (since now they'll know), but I'd be interested in playing another game of this if you ever do it again. I've since thought of many interesting starts, but I can't test them out unless there's another chance. :)

Charlie’s EOG

Thank you all for the game, specially Stephen for a great job of GMing, and to Germany and France who were no easy pushovers. I really enjoyed the challenge of trying to work out where all the units were at. France leaving Por for so long added to the puzzle, and for a while I was not quite sure if Turkey or Austria had stabbed France. A great format.

It did pay to read the rules carefully. I also did not realise the initial building rules first off. Once I found out then I had Nor and Swe in the bag and could easily freeze England out. England certainly had the toughest job.

My initial plan was to go for England and leave the south open hoping for Austria and Turkey to keep each other occupied. They, and Italy, did this well. I soon decided however that Germany was an easier target - and he kept attacking Sweden! I was fortunate to move into Munich as Germany moved out. From then on it was tough for Germany to watch two fronts and eventually he cracked though not without a fight.

The battle for England, mainly with France, was close with some interesting manouvers until Turkey stabbed France making it impossible for him to maintain his defence. From then on I was confident of the win.

I was quite surprised that Austria and Turkey did not move against me earlier. Once I had a few armies in Russia it was easy to bottle up that conflict and concentrate on the battle in the west.

Italy did have a go at me and was a nuisance for a while, but again the ATI conflict worked to my advantage. Italy had the most difficult job to stop me as he had no common front - most of the time. It was difficult for him to do anything except attack those other than Russia.

I felt that Turkey played the opportunist too much and handed me the game. If he had determined to help the others stop me it would have been possible until France was decimated. At that stage I decided to leave England and France alone and do battle with Turkey directly even though that prolonged the game by a year.

The loss of Rumania and Sevastopol had been factored into my game plan from the start so were not a real problem and did let me push into the Med for the win.