School terrorism
Participants decide whether an act is especially, somewhat, or not depraved. school terrorism Scan diet. Eventually, the Depravity Scale will be pruned to a smaller number of items about which there is widespread agreement. Some examples:Intent to emotionally traumatize the victim, through humiliation,maximizing terror, or creating an indelible emotional memory (such as causing a child to witness a violent crime). Prolonging the duration of a victim's suffering. school terrorism Cruces-terrorism. Targeting a victim because he or she was helpless. At a forum chaired by Welner, Michael H Stone, a Columbia University psychiatrist who studies sadistic parents, recited a litany of "true crime" cases. There was the father who poured boiling water over his 9-year-old son's penis and then set off a cherry bomb under his puppy, the mother who locked her daughter in the closet overnight before church, and the uncle who made his niece choose the stick with which he would beat her. school terrorism Terrorism humor. "There is always a case more revolting and depraved than the one you and I think of as the worst," he said. Psychiatrist Joseph Merlino of the New York University School of Medicine argued for a lower threshold for defining evil, as behavior that deprives people of their humanity. He talked about evil in the workplace -- actions that involved violations of trust by ordinary people, such as embezzlement by a well-liked, religious executive. The traditional approach to evil is that it "resides in certain kinds of people who are different from us," said Philip Zimbardo, a psychologist at Stanford University who is president of the American Psychological Association. Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and, now, Osama bin Laden top the list of evil people. Most people think there is an impermeable line separating good from evil that they themselves would not cross. But Zimbardo has spent his career studying what makes average people do bad things and he said he has learned that barrier is "much more permeable than we would like to believe. "A famous example was the famous 1954 study by Stanley Milgram, in which he told people they were giving others electric shocks to help the victims learn. Sixty-five percent administered shocks they believed were dangerous. When critics said that maybe the study subjects had not really believed they were hurting anyone, two California professors asked students to shock a puppy to help it learn. The students saw the very cute puppy yelping in pain after real shocks. Half the male students went ahead and administered shocks to the puppy. "What about women, nurturing, caring, loving women?" Zimbardo told the Philadelphia Enquirer recently. "One hundred percent. . . They were crying, but, in fact, they were more obedient to the teacher. "Zimbardo identified factors that push ordinary, "good" people to do bad things: obedience to authority, anonymity, diffusion of responsibility, indoctrination, and dehumanization of the enemy. Blind obedience to authority is a particular problem. "We don't teach our children how to distinguish between just and unjust authority," Zimbardo said. Personally I believe that the experimenter who set up the experiment where the puppy was repeatedly traumatized demonstrated real evil.
School terrorism
Pritikin diet || Funding-war-on-terrorism || American-terrorism || Civil-rights-and-terrorism