M A L E
.
. |
Question
|
F E M A L
E
.
. |
Yes |
Is the practice rooted in ancient barbaric
blood rituals? |
Yes |
Yes |
Was it initially adopted to suppress
or control sexuality?
(Circumcision of U.S.
males began when it was adopted from England in the late 1800s to
"prevent" masturbation. Female circumcision is practised to "prevent" promiscuity.) |
Yes |
Yes |
Did (is) the practice become (becoming)
"medicalized?" |
Yes |
Yes |
Do communities use hygiene, medicine,
religion, tradition, cancer prevention or STD transmission rates to "justify"
it? |
Yes |
Yes |
Is it usually done without anesthesia,
and is it painful and traumatic to the child? |
Yes |
Yes |
Does it carry long-term physical, sexual,
emotional or psychological effects? |
Yes |
Yes |
Does it diminish sexual sensitivity? |
Yes |
Yes |
Does it abuse, mutilate or modify
the child's body? |
Yes |
Yes |
Does it leave surgical scars in most
cases? |
Yes |
Yes |
Is it forced upon the child without
his/her consent? |
Yes |
Yes |
Do parents who insist on circumcision
being performed on their baby, believe that they do it "in the interests
of the baby"? |
Yes |
Yes |
Is it a violation of a person's fundamental
human right to his/her own body? |
Yes |
Yes |
Do the victims learn to accept it as
"normal" or even defend the practice in later life? |
Yes |
Yes |
Do the victims generally insist on
their own offspring to undergo it? |
Yes |
Yes |
Do the victims propagate it as something
"normal" and "beneficial", of lesser consequence, and try to convince others
to also do it? |
Yes |
Yes |
Was it originally generally practised
in countries with low levels of personal hygiene? |
Yes |
Yes |
Is the practice of routine circumcision
decreasing? |
Yes |
No |
Do Americans widely condemn it? |
Yes |
No |
Is it legally outlawed in most civilized
countries of the world? |
Yes |