|
REFERENCES ON THE TASK-CENTERED MODELBailey-Dempsey, C. & Reid, W. J. (1996). Intervention design and development: A case study. Research on Social Work Practice, 6, 208-228. Brown, L. (1995). Comments on the Empirical Practice Movement. Social Service Review 69(7), 152-154. Caspi, J. & Reid, W. J. (1998). The task-centered model for field instruction: An innovative approach. Journal of Social Work Education, 34(1), 55-67. Epstein, L. (1995). Comments on the Empirical Practice Movement. Social Service Review 69(7), 154-155. Gambrill, E. (1995). Author & s Reply. Social Service Review 69(7), 164-169. Naleppa, M. J. (1998). The task-centered model [On-line]. Available: http://www.task-centered.com/tctool.htm [2001, February 20]. Naleppa, M. J. & Reid, W. J. (1998). Task-centered case management for the elderly: Developing a practice model. Research on Social Work Practice, 8(1), 63-86. Reid, W. J. (1990). An integrative model for short-term treatment. In Wells & Giannetti (Eds.). Handbook of the brief psychotherapies. New York: Plenum Publishers. Reid, W. J. (1992). Task strategies: An emperical approach to social work practice. New York: Columbia University Press. Reid, W.J. (1995). Eclecticism, empiricism, minimalism and the task-centered practice: A response to Gambrill. Social Service Review 69(7), 157-163. Reid, W.J. (1995). The empirical practice movement revisited: Reflections on the comments of Brown and Epstein. Social Service Review 69(7), 155-157. Reid, W. J. (1996). Task-Centered social work. Social Work Treatment, 26, 617-640. Reid, W. J. (1997). Research on task-centered practice. Social Work Resarch, 21(3), 132-138. Reid, W. J. (No date). The task-centered model as empirical practice [On-line]. Available: http://www.task-centered.com/empirica.html [2001, February 20]. Reid, W. J. (2000). The task planner: An intervention resource for human services professionals. New York: Columbia University Press. Reid, W. J. & Bailey-Dempsey, C. (1995). The effects of monetary incentives on school performance. Families in Society, 76, 331-340. |