Blowback
Fix probation to fix prisons
More resources for probation services in California would prevent many
offenders from becoming prisoners.
By Don Meyer
January 21, 2009
California's corrections system is in a state of disarray and is in
dire need of reform. As The Times described in a Jan. 5 editorial, the
state is awaiting a decision from a panel of federal judges that will decide
whether to release more than 50,000 criminals into our communities to ease
prison overcrowding. Evidently, California is failing to rehabilitate criminals
and adding to a cyclical problem facing our prison system that returns
more than 70% of released convicts back to state prison.
As probation officers, our job is to ensure that rehabilitated probationers
do not become a statistic in our ever-growing prison population. But with
more than 300,000 offenders on probation and only 1,400 probation officers
to monitor them, we lack the necessary resources to properly supervise
the probationers. More important, without the adequate funding for rehabilitation
and prevention services, probationers will likely continue their cycle
of crime and end up in our state prison system. Failing to provide adequate
resources to local probation services will only continue to place pressure
on our overcrowded prisons and may result in more crime in our communities.
A large majority of inmates incarcerated in state prisons have been
on probation, sometimes several times, before ever setting a toe inside
prison. This means that the state fails to provide enough supervision and
rehabilitation services to prevent most of its prisoners from escalating
the severity of their crimes and being locked up at taxpayers' expense.
Worse, the state's failure makes our communities less safe. The problem
will only get worse if Sacramento continues to neglect the needs of California's
local probation services and does not take a comprehensive approach to
fixing our prison system.
If Sacramento properly funded local adult probation services, as it
has for our juvenile population, probation departments throughout the state
could provide the proper rehabilitation services and supervision to many
offenders and prevent them from imprisonment. This would help stem the
flow of probationers moving into prison and also have the added benefit
of reducing our parole caseloads and creating safer communities for our
families.
For example, a decade ago the number of minors in the state's juvenile
justice system was more than 10,000; today, it is less than 3,000. This
decline in recidivism is directly related to the funding the juvenile justice
system receives for rehabilitation and prevention programs. We know this
model works, and we know it can provide immediate and long-term relief
to the state prison system.
Spending years or months in custody with little or no rehabilitation
services does nothing to prepare offenders for their transition into law-abiding
communities. The tragedy is that many of these offenders, if given the
proper supervision and services, could turn their lives around and end
their cycle of criminal activity. The evidence has shown time and time
again that the best time to provide these services is immediately after
offenders commit their first crime. In practice, intervention is most effective
when the offenders are on probation for lower-level offenses.
California must address funding for probation supervision and rehabilitation
to effectively deal with its myriad prison issues. Unless the state does
so, Californians will always have overcrowded prisons and the attendant
budget woes.
Don Meyer, chief probation officer for Yolo County, is president of
the Chief Probation Officers of California.
|