ðHgeocities.com/Tokyo/Club/8850/2005acc.htmlgeocities.com/Tokyo/Club/8850/2005acc.htmldelayedxÞ•ÕJÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÈ€ð©. OKtext/html€š &. ÿÿÿÿb‰.HWed, 29 Aug 2007 19:30:43 GMT®Mozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)en, *Þ•ÕJ. William D. Massey | Appellate Court Case Highlights 2005
3074 East Road, Memphis, TN
38128
Phone: 901-384-4004
Fax: 901-937-8004

Appellate Court Case Highlights

Select Year of Case:

1991  |   1993   |   2001  |   2002  |   2004  |   2005

 

State of Tennessee v. Eric Berrios
Mr. Berrios was stopped by the drug interdiction task force. His car was searched and seven kilograms of cocaine were found. He was facing 15 to 25 years in jail. A motion to suppress evidence from the stop was filed and heard in the trial court over a three day period. The trial judge ordered the cocaine suppressed.
The prosecution appealed. The Court of Criminal Appeals heard argument by counsel and affirmed the trial court’s ruling, labeling the officer’s “frisk and set” conduct as constitutionally unreasonable. This ruling struck at the very heart of the protocol used by the interdiction unit. The case is now before the Tennessee Supreme Court and is one of the most important cases of the last decade regarding automobile stops and searches.