Relativity and Dark matter
Truth,
False or just a Joke?
Am
I cheating? Or are Relativists?
In order to verify the so-called great space-time concept, the general
relativists take half of the value from observation to get the theoretical
results fitting the experiment, and announce that relativity has been proved
precisely.
In Einstein’s time he even thought another half value could be caused by the
actions of gravity on light rays.
Based on the actual fact the research results show that another half observation
value is because of the infraction, which is caused by some matter such as the
ionic molecules or plasma gas surrounding the sun.
So is it possible relativists, even the famous scientist Hawking does not
recognize this knowledge?
Obviously it is easy to believe that my words are a slander just to answer
people, the infraction already has been calculated and its value is a finite
small one and can be ignored.
But the fact is that they have not done this!
How unreliable are these kind of great scientists!
The special relativity exerts that light is a pure energy and propagates without
any medium and carrier giving the constant principal of light speed a special
meaning. Actually there isn’t any practical vacuum to the light propagation
because of the existence of the dark matter. More problems with relativity are
from its supporting experiments for example the Mercury Orbit Effect. This
so-called precise theoretical calculation is just based on ignoring the
resistance that is caused by the gravitational matter “dark matter” in a one
hundred year period moving around the sun.
Is it possible that relativists or the great scientist Hawking do not know how
to calculate this resistant effect?
It is easy to reveal my words are slander just to give an answer to people about
the fact that the relativists have calculated this resistant effect and it is a
finite small one and can be ignored. But the fact is that they have not done and
surely it cannot be ignored!
How unreliable of this type of great scientists!
The derivation of the “Lorendz transformation” shows clearly that the
relativity effect is related only to the relative motions between two initial
systems however the result from the clock effect for verifying the relativity is
governed by practical moving. I am sure the relativistic mathematics is not a
problem but the premises are.
Physics has already proved firmly that the light speed varies under different
propagation conditions. And there does not exist any actual vacuum in the light
propagation because the “dark matter” existence is in space and the micro
world space between elementary particles.
Every scientist knows that you will get terribly wrong results from a wrong
premise even if there is a tiny difference from the fact at the beginning.
What a great achievement the relativity theory is? Briefly the relativity exerts
that the time and the space can be bent by the action of mass. So there existed
the start point of time, the start point of space and the time stopped area;
1.5x1010 years ago all of the time and space, as well as the
mass-energy of the Universe were concentrated on a projectile-like small region
and so on. According to Einstein’s theory it may be possible to go back in
time or travel into the future.
So what a great theory! What beautiful and high level of mathematics has been
used in the relativity theory! But both its premises and results are false. What
a nonsense and how shameless it is!
Another series of conditions shows the sordid behavior, which some relativistic
supporter possesses. Although they know the terrible conditions of the
relativity and that the infinities appeared always in the very important
theoretical calculations of relativity. And they have to make other infinities
themselves subjectively to get the results to fit the demand of those
experiments in order to let people believe this truth of relativity. This is
just like the following joke:
Every body knows that 1+1=2. But from the relativistic equation 1+1=¥. The Funny thing is that they make another ¥ and left 2 announcing the relativity was proved! You see! Now 1+1=2, that’s the classical truth!
From some unreliable premises and using false experiments, the relativity
derives so-called great space-time concepts, without any shame. Just like the
children playing a computer game.
Relativists always object to the research about the mechanism of light
propagation and the natures about some elementary interactions; so-called the
nature of varies fields. They laugh at this research, which just takes physics
several hundred years back while they have not taken even one step ahead in this
subject. They announced that the theoretical physics has reached the final top
level but they have not gained any knowledge and remain fixed at this point.
Obviously if we can’t reveal the nature of light propagation and other puzzles
in modern physics the confusions in logic and the results of false experiments
which have been verified from the relativity will be continue long time.
Actually relativists know clearly that there are lots of contra-evidence to the
relativistic theory, such as the 250 miles difficulty that the Canadian
physicist Radir posed, i.e. the results of all experiments with velocity v = 250
mile/sec always disagree with their theoretical calculations of relativity. The
terrible thing is this that these types of contra-evidences are too much for the
relativity.
I
will now quote a famous astrophysicist's comments: "all current physics
plays out in the context of a "flat manifold" according to the
postulates of special relativity, when gravity is very, very weak. And, as far
as we can ascertain, on a "curved manifold" according to the
postulates of general relativity when gravity is stronger.
According the basic logic only one contra-evidence is enough to overthrow the
so-called great classical truth, which is actually false. How detestable of this
kind of great scientists! Who are really cheating people and more terribly
cheating new generations! They are respected as physicists, solemn scientists,
but where is their honest heart?
Of course scientists in that era didn’t have enough knowledge about “dark
matter” so had to assert that light is pure energy and propagates in universal
space without any carrier or medium. With our current knowledge of “dark
matter” and hydromechanics we can state that when an object or a particle
moves in the space where the dark matter is filled up its mass, its lifetime and
its frequency should vary with its velocity. Almost none of these normal
phenomena relate to the relativistic theory. Conversely all the research results
on these subjects supports a new theory call the WG theory.
Actually the great Switzerland astronomer Ziviky who discovered the existence of
dark matter developed physics another step ahead. His contribution to science is
great and impossible to estimate. He provided us with the great chance to
continue this exploration and lead to greater success.
I hope to get supporting from honest peoples to promote the above mentioned
contents and the WG theory, and do some experiments for revealing some
characters of medium matter of light propagation that have not been revealed
before. You can only get respect from your descendents if your character and
morals are noble.