Children, (im)mobility and transport in sub-Saharan Africa: implications for meeting the MDGs

 

Gina Porter, Durham University, UK (r.e.porter@durham.ac.uk)

 

 

Summary of key points

 

  • Improving mobility and access to health and education facilities for both girl and boy children is crucial to many of the Millennium Goals, notably achieving universal primary education (MDG 2), promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment through the elimination of gender disparity in all levels of education (MDG 3), and reducing the under-five mortality rate (MDG 4).

 

  • BUT Children and youths under the age of 18 have received remarkably little specific attention in transport policy in Africa until recently, apart from limited work on road safety.  This is an extremely important omission, given that over half the population of many African countries consists of children and young people.  The AU-AfDB-ECA-WB-EU document represents an important first step forward by clarifying the crucial role of transport in achieving the MDGs, and pointing to important research gaps such as the lack of information on urban travel needs.  

 

  • The absence of a child focus in transport policy is hardly surprising given that we know relatively little about the mobility constraints faced by girl and boy children in accessing health, educational and other facilities in sub-Saharan Africa, and how these constraints impact on children's current and future livelihood opportunities.  Such knowledge is essential if we are to develop transport policy guidelines on how to help tackle them.  The AU-AfDB-ECA-WB-EU document draws attention to some of the (rather limited) specific evidence about the impact of road access and transport availability on children; for instance paved road impact on girls’ attendance at school (data from Morocco, p. 19) and the important interconnections between transport and other obstacles to schooling .

 

  • Access (i.e. ability and ease of reaching destinations, as in the transport usage of the term; Bryceson et al. 2003) may depend not only directly on transport (vehicles and roads) availability and cost allowing children to travel but may also be strongly affected by demands for children’s work, not least their transport role as porters (i.e. the common requirement to help carry goods for family members etc. because of inadequate or costly transport facilities).  The contribution of transport failures to children’s time poverty is a crucial but commonly overlooked issue. In the AU-AfDB-ECA-WB-EU document, lack of girls’ time for school (Indicators, p. 5) might be usefully linked specifically to transport failures in the home environment.  Reference is made to ERA research on women’s domestic transport effort p. 22, but very often it would seem that children’s domestic transport work is subsumed under women’s work rather than receiving specific acknowledgment: this is an area where carefully disaggregated studies of women’s and children’s effort in different cultural and environmental contexts would be useful.

 

  • We can hypothesise that there are likely to be important differences in children’s spatial mobility related to age, gender, family socio-economic status and parental status (including orphans, HIV/AIDS, single parents, foster children), urban or rural location, socio-cultural and economic context and physical environment.   Perceptual and cultural factors (e.g attitudes to girls’ mobility in Moslem societies), in particular, may play a significant role.

 

  • Recent work in Ghana and ongoing collaborative research (funded by ESRC/DFID) in contrasting areas of three very different countries (Ghana, Malawi, South Africa) aims at providing qualitative and quantitative evidence of the types of problems different African children face in these diverse contexts[1].  The principal focus in our current child-centred research programme is on a two-strand approach: a) adult researchers working with children directly to explore and understand their experiences and b) children being trained to undertake their own research with other children (on the basis that the uneven power relations between children and adults sometimes make it difficult for children to talk with adults about experiences they consider embarrassing or insignificant to adults).  The ultimate aim of this research is to provide detailed information and develop guidelines for policy makers to help them tackle current problems.

 

  • The key research question in our ongoing child-centred transport and mobility study is: to what extent do current constraints on African children’s spatial mobility and accessibility to services impede their livelihood potential and life chances and how can policy makers best address these problems? This involves examination of a series of broad hypotheses (developed from earlier research in southern Ghana):
    • Lack of reliable low cost transport may severely affect access to regular education, with subsequent impacts on livelihood opportunities and life chances.
    • Lack of reliable low cost transport may impact severely on children's access to health services (including vaccination and other preventive health services) and to adequate safe water supplies. This contributes to high child mortality and morbidity rates.
    • Children's widespread (but often hidden) role as transporters (pedestrian headloaders, cart operators etc.) may further substantially constrain their access to education, health and associated livelihood options since this brings time poverty i.e. reduces the time available to attend school or health centres etc. This is likely to apply particularly to girls, especially fostered girls.
    • Bicycles may have an important potential role in improving access to school and other services, but cultural and other factors are likely to impede their adoption, particularly among girls.  Policies to promote wider availability of cycles (for learning to ride) and cycle repair courses for girls and boys in school might impact positively on school attendance but this needs further exploration.
    • Mobility constraints may impede children's subsequent livelihood opportunities through impacts on both education and health and thus reduce overall long-term potential for poverty eradication (MDG 1).  The constraints are likely to be even greater for girls than for boys.
    • Mobility constraints on children are likely to be higher in rural than urban and peri-urban areas, but even in an urban context there may be substantial constraints imposed by transport factors or fear of mobility due to violence, witchcraft, trafficking etc., particularly for girls.
    • Mobility needs and constraints are likely to vary not only according to age and sex of the child and socio-economic status of the child’s family but also according to the broader local context (agro-ecological zone and associated economic production patterns, culture, density of school and clinic provision, availability of peripatetic services, access to radio, TV and other information services).

 

  • Our ongoing study of children, transport and mobility, involves research over 3 years in 3 countries and 6 different agro-ecological zones: adult researcher studies will be completed in urban (high-density), peri-urban, rural and remote rural (no services) contexts.  The pilot phase in each country has now been completed and our methodology finalised.  We are using a very diverse range of methods to achieve triangulation:
    • Our adult researcher studies range from life histories with young people in their twenties (looking back to the impact of mobility and access to services in earlier years on their current situation and perceptions of life chances), to mobile ethnographies with children on their walk from school to home, from focus groups with out-of-school children to questionnaire surveys. 
    • Our child researchers have selected their own methods, including travel diaries, in-depth interviews and photographic travel journals.

Through this combined effort we hope to achieve a clearer, more nuanced, understanding of the diversity of constraints and challenges children face in accessing health, educational and other facilities they feel are important to their lives, and thus to build clear guidelines to aid policy makers in achieving the MDGs which focus on children. 

 

Annexe 1: A brief review of the current state of knowledge on children and mobility in sub-Saharan Africa

Socio-spatial studies of child mobility are very rare (see below), but there is a large published literature (in Sociology, Geography, Anthropology, Education, Health Science, Child Psychology etc.) on related issues such as child labour (usually without specific reference to headloading/porterage), education and child health. Similarly, there is a growing literature dealing broadly with transport, mobility and accessibility and related gender issues in low income countries. This provides important contextual material.

 

With around half the population consisting of children under 18 years in most African countries, attention to children in a transport and livelihoods context is long overdue.  It is especially required through bereavement and illness from HIV/AIDS in southern Africa.  Children of 6 years and above often make a substantial contribution to household production and survival strategies.  Increased poverty and dependence on children, associated with Structural Adjustment Programmes and the spread of AIDS, has led to a spate of studies on child poverty, street children and children's work (Preble 1990, Bonnet 1993, Bradshaw et al. 1994, Velis 1995, Robson 1996, Porter and Phillips-Howard 1996, Kariuki 1999, Punch 2000, Canagarajah and Coulombe 2001, Ersado 2005, id21 insights 56: June 2005) and broader studies of children's rights and violence (e.g. Petty and Brown 1998, DevTech systems/CERT 2006 on violence in Malawi schools, Jewkes et al. 2006 on rape among rural South African youth, Christiansen et al. eds. 2006).  

A few studies have touched on the mobility of children in urban settings including early research by Schildkraut (1981) in Moslem Kano, Nigeria, where the mobility of children - particularly young girls - is essential for the maintenance of wife seclusion.  In the very different context of urban Uganda (Kampala), Young and Barrett (2001), consider the spaces of homeless and marginalised street children, and van Blerk (2005) draws attention to the important links between identity and mobility of street children.   

Perhaps the most substantial urban study of transport in Africa incorporating children is that conducted in Accra in the early1990s (Grieco et al.1996, Turner and Kwakye 1996, Turner et al. 1996).  This shows how the falling off in transport provision associated with structural adjustment measures (increased cost of vehicles and spare parts etc. due to devaluation raising the cost of imports etc.) has increased dependence on the work of women and children.  Children are increasingly central to the economic organisation of households.  Timing of school shifts is thus crucial since this affects their ability to perform work.  School-age girls play a significant income role by providing labour in petty trading outlets which compensates for absence of adult household members delayed in distant markets by transport problems. This can impact severely on girls' access to education (Grieco et al. 1996:3, 12).   Grieco et al.'s findings may well apply in other urban contexts. 

 

Work on children's mobility and transport in rural areas is surprisingly sparse.   Malmberg-Calvo’s (1994) examination of the role of women in rural transport (based on travel and transport surveys in four countries) is noteworthy in this respect since it incorporates some basic data on children’s contribution to transport.  Katz's research in rural Sudan (1993) shows how young children deliver messages and carry food around the village, and subsequently travel more frequently, depending on their birth-order position.  She finds a great deal of spatial autonomy, with few sex or status related differences evident until late in childhood.  Only when girls reach puberty do their spatial horizons contract. No other study is so clearly focussed on children's mobility in rural Africa. There is need for much more focussed rural analysis specifically dealing with children's mobility needs: this is a major gap.

 

In rural and urban areas, water and sanitation provision and garbage collection are likely to be factors which are particularly significant for children.  They are especially vulnerable to health hazards and carrying water and garbage is often a child's job with potentially negative impacts on health (heavy weights, noxious materials) and (through loss of time) on education (Nicol 1998, Bartlett 2001).  Accessibility problems of remote settlements and limited mobility of mothers and health staff contribute to low immunisation rates (Bosu et al. 1997; Porter 1997, 2002).  These raise the likelihood of a wide range of diseases associated with poor sanitation and water supplies (UNDP Human Development Report 2002). 

 

Throughout Africa, with few exceptions, more than half the children in any given age-group fail to attend school regularly (Bonnet 1993).  This is related to the opportunity costs of children's time spent at school and the high outlays which have to be made in school fees and/or associated costs (e.g. transport.   Girls' enrolment rates are generally much lower than boys'.  Even when children attend school, they commonly perform household duties both before and after classes.  Apprenticeships also may operate alongside, or take the place of Western schooling (Robson 1996).  The boundaries between 'school' and 'work' are often blurred (Roberts 1998): travel to school in Ghana, for instance, often incorporates porterage duties (Porter and Blaufuss 2002).  There are few studies directly concerned with school transport in Africa: the inclusion of children in South Africa’s National Household Travel Survey 2003 and associated analysis of trips to educational centres is an important step forward.  Gould (1973) noted that poor transport services forced most Ugandan children to walk to primary school while the low density of secondary schools usually required children to live away from home: this situation still pertains widely across Africa (for a recent review of conditions in Eastern Cape, South Africa see Potgeiter et al. 2006). Vasconcellos (1997) emphasises the way low density of rural schools and limited availability and high cost of public transport forces most rural children to abandon formal schooling after relatively few years in Brazil and also raises road safety problems of poorly maintained public transport driven by poorly trained drivers over poorly maintained roads. This work resonates with conditions in Africa but needs verification.

 

Coverage of children's road safety issues is surprisingly limited.  Epidemiological trends in developing countries show that mortality rates of childhood infectious diseases are declining while rates of injury-related death and disability are increasing (Mock et al. 1999).  Road accidents are the single greatest cause of injury and death among 15-19 year old men.  In Africa there was a three-fold increase in the number of road deaths between 1968 and 1983 (Ansell 2005:123).   A study of child accident victims in Nigeria (Adesunkanmi et al 2000) shows that the majority are pedestrians and mostly over 5 years: they were often injured while trading at the roadside.  Mock et al. (1999) emphasise that in Ghana children have a particularly high exposure to accidents in both rural and urban areas.  Much road safety work lacks a gender perspective.

 

The potential for Intermediate Means of Transport to improve children's access to services needs investigation.  A few studies indicate the potential significance of bicycles.  Grieco et al. (1996) illustrate the impact of diverse ethnic backgrounds on cycle usage. Unlike children from northern Ghana living in Accra, children from southern ethnic groups are not encouraged to cycle by their families.  Among boys it is perceived as dangerous while girls daring to ride are considered of 'questionable sexuality' (Grieco, Turner and Kwakye, n.d.).    There is particular need to further explore the range of attitudes to cycling for girls. Although recent gender studies suggest some variation among different cultural groups, there appears to be a widespread tendency for women to have less access to cycles and other intermediate transport types than men (Fernando and Porter 2002).  We need to know to what extent this impacts on school attendance and access to other facilities.  We also need to assess the potential for improving girls' access to cycles and cycle repair courses (Porter and Blaufuss 2002).  A review of the shova kalula programme in South Africa by Mahapa (2003) is particularly instructive from this perspective.

 

 



[1]  The earlier Ghana research is reported in Porter and Blaufuss 2002. The ESRC/DFID -funded study on child mobility in sub-Saharan Africa is led by the author. Collaborators are as follows: Albert Abane (University of Cape Coast); Michael Bourdillon; Kate Hampshire (Durham University); IFRTD secretariat (London); Mac Mashiri (CSIR, Pretoria); Alister Munthali (University of Malawi) and Elsbeth Robson (Universities of Durham and Malawi).