HIS 11TH RESPONSE

You are correct, and the legal documents state that we are a Christian Nation

false. who carers what they you think they cribed from. they never mention christ or god in the damn doc. sheesh

X is there. I have stated it 2 times and can do more in the Constitution alone, not to mention hundreds of other letters and writings

stop the reams and reams of nonsense and point to the actual part that mentions christ and or god. this is the siliest thing I have ever heard. the mere fact that your can't answer with a siimple citation points to the incredible emptiness of your position. It all interpretation, etc etc

X is there. I have stated it 2 times and can do more in the Constitution alone, not to mention hundreds of other letters and writings.

fact is its al worthless cause we can find similar laws from other faiths. Did you ever try that? a more honest approach would be to see which religion it fits closer. No you just try yhr one religion you want to fit. Like only testing one person for a blood match in a crime, then when its sort of close, declaring that person as the culprit. sheesh

Read the above and address my facts, if you dare!

i did. you lost. 1) you don't check for matchs to other religions 2) who even cares as GOD IS NOT MENTIONED.

Sheesh... in other words.. a foundation of atheists would be "budhist based" if you could trace any of there document back to any buddhist doc ever made. Hardly.

In other words you don't like legal reasoning at all. You prefer to obscure it all.

And listen up.. endless nonsense is not being educated. You are just a persistent nut.

Read the above and address my facts, if you dare!

i did. you lost. 1) you don't check for matchs to other religions 2) who even cares as GOD IS NOT MENTIONED.

Sheesh... in other words.. a foundation of atheists would be "budhist based" if you could trace any of there document back to any buddhist doc ever made. Hardly.

In other words you don't like legal reasoning at all. You prefer to obscure it all.

And listen up.. endless nonsense is not being educated. You are just a persistent nut.

Logic? Can you give me some examples of what our founding fathers intended in their writings for our Country to be. Why don't you choose four or five Founding Fathers and give me some of their writings that say they wanted our country to be anything but Christian. CHALLENGE 1!

Simple. its in the constitution and the bill of rights. I dont need to make up anything. (as you clearly are doing, big time)

You remind me of a evolution "challenger" that doesnt know the first thing about his actual subject (I.E. science in general) but because he can quote lation thinks he wins the argument and lo and behold evolution is proevn wrong. false

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness."

If they meant GOD they would have said GOD. Simple. You are a revisionsist pure and simple. FACT. And it doesnt say "THE creator" it says "THEIR creator"

1) the palin reading of the doc does not agree with you

2) The rest. I dont care.

3) A group of self professed atheists creating a LEGAL document endows its doc with the rights in the DOC. No fiddle faddling or such will create it as religious. Learn. Read. I'm not a lawyer but any lawyer would frown at what you seem to believe ... that a contract is not binding. It is.

The Constitution of Delaware 1776

of DELAWARE. Sheesh you are lame.

lame lame LAME

Christopher Columbus was a Christian and his purpose was to spread the Christian word and discover new lands and start them Christian.

sure. and then they forgot to mention the word God or Christ in the actual constitution or Bill Of Rights. and there is an actual clause giving freedom of religion, etc.

HA HA HA HA

IN contracts, you either make a contract and abide by it or you DON'T

Its not in there dude....

LOLOLOL

What, did your preacher catch you with a playbor and you are forced to repeat all this blather that your side has accumlated for the past 100 years?

HAHAHAHAHAHA

Thanks for the laughs. Vie never heard such nonsense all my life.

Well except from the WMD nuts that face the same problem.. There is no X to be found (in this case WMD) and they try every trick in the book to brainwash people its there.

Sad.

SO sad.

Truth is truth and contracts are contracts.

lolol

hey what next? Proving that unicorns are real cause your reading of the bible says they are?

hahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahah

I've never seen anyone spend so much time to prove how dumb they were. If you can't point to the exact spot that mentions God, whats the point of all your inanity?

HAHAHAHHAHA

Yeha I know you think you are smart cause you can paste in all this crap. Thing is, it just proves how stuipid you truly are. And on the side of evil. Cause crap like this is what led to people "believing" in the WMD when they shoudl have focused on the HARD EVIDENCE.

Which there was zero.

I told you from the start.. its like WMD> point it out. you cant its just blather. Like tge same nuts that believe in nessie and big foot. They all "believe" there own crap and can spout endles lines and personal sightings.. what they CANNOT do (like you my muddleheaded so called person) is find the HARD EVIDENCE.

TELL ME.. DO YOU ALL GO TO SOME SCHOOL THAT TEACHES MUDDLE HEADED THINKING SO YOU CAN "BELIEVE" IN THE DAVINCI CODE?

Your "kind" really doesnt get it. To us (critical thinking type people) we were exonerated by the whole WMD farce. Why? The particular ways people tried to "prove" it was real. I.E... the insane claims that they knew it was real. Based on hard evidence? hardly. BASED on there verbal skills and logical fallacies.

Just as you are trying to do (but in fact the only thing you do is reduce me to tears of laughter).

Keep on conjugating your Latin verbs to the nth degree. Guess what : the people that thought witches were real were better than you. But they were totally muddle headed like you also!

Critical thinking is new and the more "education" you get the further away from realizing the truth you will be (because in the back of your mind you constantly think : if there are reams and reams of info in an argument I need to absorb and process it all. FALSE. most things can be proven pretty straightforwardly. If not then its clear they dont have any hard evidence and rely on reams and reams of balderdash)

Like your interplanetary display of foolishness.

As far As i can gauge, you have three types of arguments:

1) They may have mentioned GOD in some other doc in America

Who cares? I'm talking about the overall legal documents that exist to govern all of America. DUH. Not podunk Ohio. If they do it only works there not here.

2) They may have based some of the constitution or BOR on some pre existing Christian motiffs. Again so what. thats clearly been disproven, as a) a foundation of atheists might inadvertently make some rule that could be traced to some pre existing Christian doc. It contravenes the clear reading of what is claimed.

In other words you don't believe in the rule of law.

3) Some of the founders may have been of "x" persuasion.

So what? That's clearly a non starter also - if some group created a club with by laws and they never mentioned rules about being gay, it hardly "proves" they wanted the club to be gay if you can after the fact "show" that they were all gay.

When they come out with the next definition of silly in the dictionary, your photo should be right there.

In other words.... your big "idea" is to PRETEND that god is mentioned in the

Constitution or BOR. fine. You go ahead and DO that. Why not? your kind also "pretended" that the WMD were in IRAQ.

On what planet were you born?

thanks for the laughs... I cant remember the last time I ever laughed so hard.

Oh and I know you want to be taken seriously.

So do all the yeti and big foot believers.

What will make us take them seriously?

SAY it with me.

Yes you can.. when you stop reading your latin and how to kill wiches.

HARD EVIDENCE.

Snicker

Its not what you know or have .. its what you do with it.

But thanks.. I;m sure you shall respond and I can update my list of mistakes you made.

Sorry about all the name calling but I TOLD YOU UP FRONT what I would consider in such a lame argument. Actual bona fide cases where God was mentioned. (And not just any deity).

But did you even listen? nope. You ignored the rules i gave you and just blithely made up your own (while also making up your own form of jurisprudence it seems, where you can "interpret" law from your "opinions" and I guess mood rings of the founders) and expected me to treat you seriously.

Its like the WMD all over again.. the mere FORM your arguments take scream far louder than any words you could use to advance your case.

You DO know that just because some of the founders may have gone to such and such a church, there hearts and minds may not have followed? Hence the lack of the mention of GOD? (I'm playing your game in reverse). Do you want me to quote some of the words of the founders against religion?

We could argue what they actually thought all the live long day. But guess what we dont have to.. as there words are there for us all to ponder. Look at the actual documents and not which Christian (or Buddhist) ones you think they cribbed off of. Sheesh.

LOLOL

Its funny to think there are people in the world like you, that are so incredibly talented and bright in one field, and yet so utterly desiccated in another.

Did you learn nothing of the import of hard evidence (from the WMD case?)

Well guess what.. I did.

Never again.

Umm.. no wonder legal documents were created. I can see clowns like you "interpreting" what some ruling on murder actually "meant" . sheesh and double sheeh. In your mind murder can be wrong, or right or any place in the spectrum asl long as you can quote some arcane Latin text on the subject? talk about chaos and anarchy. Sheesh. Where do people like you come from? from the dark side of Uranus?

Also, during this email I will present numbered facts and challenges to you to answer. If you fail to do so, I will accept your total surrender on this topic.

Oh right.

LOLOL..

the burden of proof is on you to prove your claims. All you have proven is that you can run on at the mouth endlessly. (why? CAUSE EVERY SINGLE SCOTUS RULING BACKS ME UP. You are the pretender to the intelectual throne here)

IN other words.. nessie aint real cause you can create 10001 inane arguements.

Shes real when you find HARD EVIDENCE.

I've never been more skeptical of someone's critical thinking skills than yours.

Talk about an argument of form over function. You don't need 1001 reasons or arguments to believe in UFOS.. you just need one actual piece of Hard evidence. same with you.

But you got nothing.

iTS REALLY BIZARE HOW YOU "THINK". YOU ARE THE WMD BELEIVER INCARNATE. YOU DON'T HAVE ANY HARD EVIDENCE TO PRESENT SO YOU BURST ONTO THE SCENE WITH 1001 "PROOFS" AND THINK THE OTHER PERSON IS DERELET IF THEY DONT SPENT ENDLESS AMOUNTS OF TIME BURSTING EACH AND EVERY ARGEUMENT.

NOT HOW IT WORKS CLOWN.

YOU MADE THE CLAIM. SIMPLY PRESENT THE BEST PIECE OF HARD EVIDENCE.

LIKE THE CULT OF WMD.. YOU GOT ZILCH.

READ A BOOK.

THERE IS A PATH TO WISDOM BUT YOU ARE MOVING FURTHER AND FURTHER FROM IT.

YOUR JOB AS A HUMAN BEING IS NOT TO LISTEN TO YOUR PREACHER AND FIND ANY ARGUMENT TO BACK THEM UP.

ITS TO HELP PREVENT THE WITCH HUNTS AND EVILS OF THE HOLOCAUST FROM RECURRING BECAUSE PEOPLE DIDN'T BOTHER TO APPLY CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS.

WHAT A WASTE.

THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE. LEARN HOW TO FIND IT.

I asked you were they mentioned GOD in the official DOCs and you cant. you lost. Admit defeat. LOLO. and "their creator" doesn't count... this could refer to the Hindu creator myths or indeed any.

LOLOL.

Even worse you out and out LIE and say "yes they did mention GOD" and run off on some other irrelevant DOC. I don't care what they said in philly or in some other DOC you dredged up. Sheesh

Do you realize how much time you have wasted and you cantd asnwer the question directly?

LOLOLOL

Technically you are guilty of flase advertising. You advertise such and such and when you get down to it you have nothing but speculation. So like the yeti hunters you are related to.

Its like a joke : a man walks into a restaurant and asks for spaghetti and meatballs. When he gets the dish there are no visible meatballs. When asked the maiterde says "But sir! They are ground up! Trust me they are there! Only the most vulgar places have huge lumps of meat!"

The guy continues eating but swears its just plain sauce. He takes a sample and has it analyzed in a lab. The results; Pure sauce, and no meat or any meat related by product.

When presented with this the maiterde just won't admit there was no meat in the sauce. He says that the sauce is so light it can't be detected and gives the guy a 100 page novel that lists all the "proofs" that there is meat in the sauce.

Realizing the person is a liar, he simply takes it to court and has them render a verdict. And he gets a class action suit and payment for the false advertising, because they cant simultaneously CLAIM there is meat and charge for it if they can't POINT to the actual meat.

You have no meatballs meat head. And guess what.. the authortites agree. SCOTUS says you have no meat. And they have examined it far closer than you or I have.

Show me the meat!!!!!!!

(You can't; you just THINK there is meat)

LOLOL

SHOW ME the MEAT MEAT HEAD

You are correct, and the legal documents state that we are a Christian Nation. FACT 2-the Declaration of Independence was adapted from the Mecklenburg Declaration, which declared many similarities and was send by special messenger to the Continental Congress with identical language used. A quote from it, 'We here

What a crock. Its in Some OTHER document. are you on drugs?

What part of it not being in the doc on hand dont you comprehend?

If I would even THINK of allowing any of this crappola to influence me, I would have to drop all normal legal rules for the anarchry you propose

Dont bother responding. Its lik etalking to a robot that spouts out nonsense

Is this a joke? fess up.

I ask for evidence in the actual bonafide BOR or constitution and you say YES! Its in another document I think was the source for all this.

Dude.. this is a gag right?

Last chance to redeem yourself. You have two and only two documents to choose from. Make you best case (and no mind reading of the founders or OTHER docs not in evidence. Just THOSE TWO. paste in parts from those two and I will check they are real). Pretend this is a test and your prof has indicted you must make a case from only those 2 sources and those sources ALONE.

Ready? Begin