| HIS NINTH RESPONSE | |||||||||||||
| AS I SAID EARLIER.. THE DOC WAS TOP COVER ALL AMERICANS AND NOT THE FOUNDERS (CLEARLY) SO YOU DONT MAKE ANY SENSE. THEY KNEW OF OTHER RELIGIONS AT THE TIME | |||||||||||||
| I CAN SEE YOU CEDE DEFEAT AS YOU CANT COUNTER WHAT I SAID.; | |||||||||||||
| THE DOC WAS MEANT TO COVER ALL AMERICANS CAN NOT JUST THE FOUNDERS. OTHER WISW WHATS THE POINT? | |||||||||||||
| YOU LOSE. | |||||||||||||
| AND YOU STILL CANT FIND GOD IN THE DOC. | |||||||||||||
| JUST YOUR CREATION OF HIM | |||||||||||||
| .. | |||||||||||||
| SNICKER... STILL WORRIED ABOUT EVOLUTION? | |||||||||||||
| "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ..." | |||||||||||||
| The Free Exercise Clause has generally come to mean that one may believe anything, but that religious actions and rituals can be limited by laws that are passed for compelling government reasons. A law passed that is aimed at a particular religion or religions in general have been considered unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court. Laws must be neutral in regard to religions. | |||||||||||||
| LOOK YOU IDIOT. ITS ILLEGAL TO PROHIBIT THE FREE EXERCISE OF ANY RELIGION., IF THEY MEANT ONLY CHRISTIAN RELIGIONS THEN TOO BAD AS ITS A LEGAL DOCUEMNT,. | |||||||||||||
| FURTHER MORE YOU ARE TOTAYLY WHACKED. A LEGAL DOCUMENT DEFINES WHAT IS ALLOWED AND NOT. NOT WHAT YOU THINK THEY MEANT. | |||||||||||||
| SHEESH.... | |||||||||||||
| READ A BOOK. | |||||||||||||
| AND LOOK UP THE IDEA OF AN ANALOGY WHILE YOU ARE AT IT | |||||||||||||