Class A2                                                                Bong Ha Jin

Title: The reason of economic polarization and the solution of it. 

These days, economic polarization is a big issue around the world. What is
 this economic polarization which makes people so nervous? Economics defines
 the economic polarization as the situation which two groups are located on 
completely opposite sides. It means that there is an economic gap between rich
 countries and poor countries. The gap can be observed if you compare the 
situations of African countries and America. According to 'If The World were a
 Town of 100 people' written by Ikeda Kayoko, about 60% of African children 
are suffering from starvation. On the contrary, 35% of American children under 
age 17, are seriously concerned about their obesity. The book also said that 
if one american student skips a meal which costs about $6 and sends that money
 to Africa, it can provide two starving children with food for a month and also
it's enough to pay for injecting vaccine and to cover the lack of vitamins. 
Many Africans are losing their eyesight because they can not take enough 
vitamins. 


Then, what are the reasons of polarization in the economy? Here are four main 
reasons that give rise to this polarization. The first reason would be 
interference from advanced countries. Because developed countries are 
concerned about newly industrializing countries, developed countries try to 
prevent newly industrializing countries' economic growth. The second factor is 
the unstable economical support of governments. As most developing countries 
are suffering from political conflicts, from their viewpoints, the economy 
would be the second issue. 


Also, poor infrastructure would be another reason. Developing countries have 
no infrastructure which is proper to lead economic growth. They have poor 
transportation systems and lack monetary facilities. 


The last reason would be an external factor. The saturation of the world 
market prevents underdeveloped countries' economic advancement. Developed 
countries produce a lot of goods which are high quality but the global market 
is filled with those products. Therefore, developing countries with goods 
which are low quality  would be hard to compete with developed countries. 


If these unbalanced economic situations last and developing countries can't
 break through these situations, the economic gap would get wider and wider. 
Eventually, underdeveloped countries would find that they are impossible to 
reach the opposite side beyond the gap. After all, developing countries would 
only be able to provide cheap labor and places where industrially advanced 
countries items to sell. From now on, I'll discuss factors of polarization in 
depth and suggest methods to break through this vicious cycle. 


One of the main reasons for polarization is an interference of developed 
countries. According to the book 'Kicking away the ladder' written by 
economist Chang Ha Jun, developed countries kick away the ladder after they 
reached the top. Thus, other following countries which also try to use the 
same ladder fail to go upward. Also, advanced countries suggest 'good policy' 
and 'good governance' to developing countries. In this case, 'good policy' 
and 'good governance' are an attitude  supporting a open economy and an 
attitude following all the international laws such as the Accord on 
Intellectual Property Rights and the Labor Relations Act. But Mr. Chang 
emphasizes that the attitude of developed countries forcing underdeveloped 
countries to follow 'good policy' and 'good governance' is completely a 
paradox. He found out that developed countries had economic growth by 
committing those things which now they want developing countries not to 
commit. 


Mr. Chang also blamed newly industrializing countries for taking advantage of 
the 'not good policy' and the 'not good governance' until they reach the 
complete advanced country. For example, when advanced countries were 
developing countries, advanced countries protected their infant industries, 
hired industrial spies, and plagiarize patents. However, if newly 
industrializing countries reach the developed country, they start to support 
an open economy system and strongly prohibit plagiarizing patents. As a 
result, those stricter international rules make underdeveloped countries to 
suffer more from the economic problem because they can't cut corners as 
developed countries did.


The next reason would arise from unstable governments and social systems. 
Since economic developments should be based on the government's strong 
support, unstable governments in undeveloped countries can be an obstacle to 
economic growth. In 'The Future of the World' written by Ikegami Akira who 
tried to understand the world through statistics, there are thirty eight 
million refugees in Afghanistan, five hundred thirty thousand in Iraq, four 
hundred forty thousand in Somalia, and three hundred fifty thousand in 
Vietnam. The enormously large number of refugees show us obviously that 
societies of underdeveloped countries are chaotic. It's almost impossible to 
lead a fine industry from chaos. 


To make situations more miserable, those countries swarm with terrorists. 
According to 'The Future of the World', except for only Morocco, all of the 
African countries have terrorists. People who possess most of the nation 
prosperity are supporting the terrorists instead of the national economy. As a 
result, the power of the terrorists is getting stronger and developing 
countries proclaim default. Most of the public revenue is spent buying arms.


Also, the social system such as a low literacy rate makes the problem worse. 
Governments of underdeveloped countries can not afford to educate people. 
According to 'the future of the world', except for South Africa and Cameroon, 
all of the African nations have a low literacy rate and most nations can't 
even do a survey because of such a low literacy rate. From this fact, we can 
find out that without solving problems which I dealt above, the economic 
growth in developing countries would be fundamentally impossible. Factories 
can not be run by illiterate people. In this state, it is natural for 
government to focus on reforming the society rather than raising the economy. 
Governments of developing countries should reform the social system and solve 
the fundamental problem. As a result, the economic problems must be the second
 issue. 


The third factor of the economic polarization is the poor social 
infrastructure. First of all, developing countries have no financial 
foundation. According to the book of Ikegami Akira,'the future of the world', 
most of the developing countries are Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC). 
They can't afford to pay back national debt. Most of the public revenue is 
evaporated by tax dodging and power holders. Since public revenue is 
overwhelmed by national debt, developing countries can't escape the economic 
vicious cycle. 



Also, one of the most important social infrastructures for economic 
developments is transportation and storage system. However, developing 
countries are lacking in those infrastructures. For example, Indonesia can not
 afford to lay highways and  can't even lay paved roads. There is no one who 
knows how to lay highways. Also, according to information from the 
webpage 'http://blog.naver.com/qofjrak92/140016856923', geographical features 
of Indonesia, where the ration of forest takes about 60% out of the whole land
 because of a tropical climate, find it impossible to construct roads. If they
 want to lay the road, they need to cut down all of the trees on the way. The 
construction would cost a lot and probably have to destroy huge amounts of 
land although the lands are very important since the economy of developing 
countries is mainly based on agriculture.



Last but not least, a saturated global market centered on developed countries 
 creates polarization. If developing countries want to be advanced, they 
should succeed in world market. Although they have two ways to succeed, they 
have difficulty in using those methods. The first method is winning 
competition in quality. These days, people tend to seek things that have good 
quality although it's very expensive. Advanced countries use a lot of methods 
to meet those demands. They use delicate computer programs and precise 
machines to produce goods. On the contrary, developing countries have to work 
through the whole night to make one fine product. They have no factory or 
machine tools. Even if they have machines, there are few skilled hands to 
operate a factory. Most of the skilled labor went to developed countries to 
find better working conditions and better salaries. 



Also, if you look at the total output, underdeveloped countries can hardly win 
with developed countries. Let me give an example with agriculture. The way of 
developed countries' cultivation is very scientific. For example, developed 
countries use an improved seed (which is called miracle rice). However, 
African countries cultivate in devastated areas because they don't know how to
 use fertilizer and can't afford to buy it. In a same size of area, developed 
countries such as America and Australia can harvest about three times as much 
as underdeveloped countries can. As a result, underdeveloped countries are not
 able to produce competitive goods. Thus, they don't have any source of 
foreign currency.



If the vicious economic cycle of underdeveloped countries keeps going on, soon 
the world would be completely divided into two. To prevent this tragedy, we 
need a constant effort. 


Developing countries have a lot of good samples which can be very useful for 
their economic growth. They can take only good economic policy and reduce the 
chance of economical mistakes. However, developing countries must consider 
their own conditions when they introduce the economy policies of developed 
countries. Developing countries should be able to transform the developed 
countries' policies into their own styles because even though the policy is 
very good, sometimes it can be hard to introduce. 


Moreover, developing countries should make every effort to lift their economic 
condition. One of the efforts is the AU (African Union) and the ASEAN 
(Association of Southeast Asian Nations). The EU is a role model of the AU. 
The AU tries to follow the example of the EU. Both EU and ASEAN are planning 
to set up an associated assembly and a central bank. Also, they are 
considering a currency reform. According to Agence France-presse, ASEAN is 
aiming at economical and political cooperations among southeast asian nations. 
Ten nations already joined and many other countries are preparing to join. 
However, most of the southeast asian nations are competing against each other. 
So, economical cooperation is very rare. This fact that there are rare 
economical cooperations between developing countries is also one of the 
problems that developing countries should solve. They should know that the 
perfect cooperation can be an enormous energy to boost up their economic 
situations. 


For underdeveloped countries, solving their economic problems might not be 
easy. However, Where there's a will, there's a way. If developing countries 
start to solve from the fundamental problems carefully and fully use given 
examples, someday they will break through the vicious cycle.  












Works Cited

Books
✔Chang Ha-joon. "Kiking away the ladder". Anthem Press (The Korean version-Bookie Press), 2002

✔Ikegami Akira. "The future of the world"(¼¼°è´Â Áö±Ý ¾îµð·Î °¡°í ÀÖ³ª). Kodansa
 Ltd. (The Korean version-Jong Moon Press), 2002

✔Ikeda Kayoko. "If the world is a town of 100 people" (¼¼°è°¡ ¸¸ÀÏ 100¸íÀÇ ¸¶À»À̶ó¸é). Gook Ill Media, 2001

Internet Resources

-Newspaper article on the internet

✔"ASEAN Sets Up Development Fund to Bridge Economic Gap Between Members."AFP(Agence France-presse) 26 July. 2005

✔"New report highlights economic gap" RTE(Radio Telefis Eireann) news 24 July. 2001

✔"Áß»êÃþ ±Þ¼ÓºØ±«, Þ¸¡¤Ý£ ¾ç±ØÈ­- The rapid desolation of the middle class, economic polarization" Á¶¼±ÀϺ¸-Chosun daily 21 Dec. 2004 

-Professional articles on the internet

✔Omar, Kaleem. "The economic gap between rich and poor nations is widening even further." jang.com. 09 February 2003. Business & Finance Review


✔"BLACK PROGRESS: TWO WAYS TO LOOK AT IT" KeepMedia BusinessWeek 14 July. 2003


✔ÀÌÀ±±Ô-Lee Yoon Gyue "ºóºÎ¾ç±ØÈ­ ÇØ¼Ò¹æ¾È-The solution of the economical gap" 
Personal research paper. 15 March. 2006


✔±è½Â¿ë-Kim Seung Yong ¡°Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ ¼Ò°³-About Indonesia" 
Naver.com personal website.