Chilling temperatures limit the activity of Calvin cycle enzymes, thus reducing the utilization of absorbed light energy for CO2 assimilation (Leegood 1995, Wise 1995). This diminished demand for absorbed light energy can render plants more susceptible to photoinhibition (Melis 1999). In fact, even relatively moderate photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFDs) can induce photoinhibition at chilling temperatures.
The rate of oxygen photoreduction increases during chilling, increasing the production of the reactive oxygen species (ROS), superoxide (O2-), H2O2, and, potentially, the hydroxyl radical (Wise and Naylor 1987, Hodson and Raison 1992, Wise 1995, Prasad 1996). There is evidence that ROS may be produced at both PS II and PS I (Foyer and Harbinson 1994, Osmond and Grace 1995, Melis 1999). Because these highly reactive substances can damage proteins involved in photosynthetic electron transport and thylakoid membrane lipids (Halliwell and Gutteridge 1999), as well as deactivate certain Calvin cycle enzymes (Charles and Halliwell 1981), they are implicated in the mechanism of chilling-induced photoinhibition.
Although chloroplasts possess a system of antioxidant enzymes that can detoxify ROS before they damage cellular constituents, during chilling in the light, the rate of ROS formation may exceed the enzyme capacity to scavenge them (for reviews see Asada 1994, 1999, Foyer and Harbinson 1994, Foyer et al. 1994b, Logan et al. 1999). The enzymic system includes superoxide dismutase (SOD) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX), whose combined activities catalyze the conversion of O2- to H2O, while oxidizing ascorbate (Asada 1999). Two mechanisms to regenerate ascorbate involve reduced glutathione, either as a substrate for dehydroascorbate reductase (reviewed in Noctor and Foyer 1998) or perhaps via non-enzymatic reduction of oxidized ascorbate under the alkaline conditions present in the stroma during illumination (Winkler et al. 1994). Chloroplastic GR maintains the pool of reduced glutathione, using NADPH as a reductive substrate. The importance of antioxidant enzymes in the protection of the photosynthetic apparatus during photoinhibitory conditions, such as those that develop with chilling in the light, is indicated by the following observations: a) the activities of these enzymes generally increase during acclimation to chilling temperatures (Sch?er and Krause 1990, Prasad 1996, Hull et. al. 1997, Fryer et al. 1998, Logan et al. 1998), presumably to cope with increased ROS production; b) a correlation exists between resistance to chilling-induced photoinhibition and high antioxidant enzyme activities in comparative studies of chilling-sensitive versus chilling-resistant cultivars or species (Wise and Naylor 1987, Janke et al. 1991, Kocsy et al. 1996, Hodges et al. 1997); c) supplementing isolated thylakoid preparations with antioxidant enzymes reduces their susceptibility to photoinhibition (reviewed in Tyystj?vi et al. 1999).
These observations underlie attempts to increase plant resistance to chilling-induced photoinhibition via genetic manipulation of leaf antioxidant systems (for reviews see Foyer et al. 1994a, Allen 1995). |