Who would have believed some seventeen(17) years ago that the USSR would today be history? Kingdoms come and go!
On March 20, 2003, the USA, Great Britain and their materialistic government allies defined "DICTATORSHIP" to its most extreme and perfect form. In "In Defense of Dignity", I mentioned that "you have to know and understand the people of the United States of America in order to reasonably deal with them not only for your benefit but theirs as well" and that "the majority of my USA people are people who unfortunately have come to strongly believe that everything in life is a win-lose situation and the USA has to win, regardless of the consequences". You can never accurately guess the logical behaviour of the majority of the USA unless you have lived (not as some dignitary) with these my people. The majority of the USA are people who have never really dealt with their past, and as a result, tend to be not just their own worst enemies but the world's at large. The majority of the USA do not understand the meaning of the word "PEACE" - a peaceful, self-respectful or cooperative individual is assumed a weak and easy target.
The pot calling a kettle black.
The United States of America (God bless America) is a very comical nation to be in. This is a supposedly godly nation where promiscuity and abominable acts are celebrated. A nation whose current president, george bush junior, thinks ozzy osbourne, a USA slurred-speech-drug-addict who bites heads off of creatures, is worth celebrating; a nation that continues to enslave its people and holds captive its original inhabitants; a nation that creates difficult situations for its lower income and Blacks with hope they will remain at the bottom and remain dependent on its "elites" who continue to fantasize that people can always be boxed against their will; a nation where Blacks have never been allowed to be themselves (successful Blacks in the USA are either people who relentlessly fight for their rights and as a result have alert signals on them, or are crowd-followers who have accepted dehumanization and as a result can only perform as told, regardless of the ethics of an issue); a nation that would go as far as recruiting non-nationals to demean its Blacks to help ensure its submissive Blacks - its ego and self-esteem boosters - are handy and never scarce. Since birds of the same feathers folk together, I guess the same could be said of the government of Great Britain, the inhumane, manipulative opportunists taking advantage of peoples' weaknesses and probably still dreaming of their colonial days. For crying out loud, "Great Britain", a society that accepts not its own majority simply because they have not a recognized name or "proper breeding", of all nations to be talking of human rights violations!
Piracy at any cost.
How did all this 2003 sorry and disgraceful acts in Iraq start? It started with george bush junior trumpeting 911, 2001, and desperately attempting to link president Hussein and Iraq to the copycat tragedies of 911, 2001. After a failed attempt, an alleged non-compliance with a UN's (weapons of mass destruction) resolution 1441 became the loophole against Iraq by the USA, a nation that itself would not comply with the UN's Nuclear nonProliferation Treaty(NPT) on weapons of mass destruction. When asked how the search for Mr. bin Laden became a quest of president Hussein and Iraq or what the link was between terrorism and disarmament, president george bush junior as often went blank, and his comrade tony blair replied that, terrorism and disarmament go hand in hand (I think he means that plundering and natives' or inhabitants' capability for self-defense do not go hand in hand - remember Thomas Gage and Francis Smith and their mission of April 18, 1775, in North America? To ensure plundering, they were to seize and destroy all artilleries and ammunitions found) -
Yes, it is April 18, 1775, and Texas all over!. By mid March, 2003, the pitiful leaders had shamelessly arrived at "we have to liberate the people of Iraq ..." Since the mission message preceding their current madness display in Iraq is the "liberation of the Iraqi people", how is it this was not their point and the priority on the UN's agenda during those months of harassment of Iraq? And just how do you, for heaven's sake, liberate a nation by killing them, destroying their properties or disabling their economy? Only the Iraqis and/or residents of Iraq have the right to initiate, organize and lead any coalition against their government in their land!
If the people of Iraq or any other nation had concluded their government was unfair and oppressing them, and the facts finding sustained their allegations, then a UN assisted coalition initiated by the people of the nation would be proper. How dare any non-Iraqi national and/or resident decide and dictate how the people in Iraq are to lead their lives as though the people of Iraq have no minds of their own? What happened to Article 1 of the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights: "All human beings are ... They are endowed with reason and conscience ..."? Who, by the way, elected the USA or Great Britain the world's hypocritical police? And why isn't the UN in Iraq chasing out these unfocused hypocritical imbeciles who ought to be in their own lands sweeping and cleaning their own putrid messes?
Hoverfly impersonating yellow-jacket.
Only ignorance will cause a person to believe the USA or any developed nation is a super power. Individual or national strength is not directly or inversely proportional to arms or military capabilities. To gang up against a person or nation is not an exhibition of strength. On the contrary, such acts reveal weakness, fear and insecurity. You will remember that it was not any developing nation grounding planes, rollercoasting alert colours, etc. People or nations only perish for lack of knowledge - the lack of knowledge about one's self, one's endowed abilities and one's Creator. Show me a person or group of persons that believe everything in life is a win-lose situation, and I'll show you a wimp(s), person or persons without imagination.
Co-conspirators.
How remorseful that the UN could not read between the lines of the USA's urgency, unless, of course, this was a disguised and twisted joint effort against the Iraqis. How could the UN have entertained the lame charges and arguments by the USA, the very nation that would not, for more than thirty(30) years, comply with a UN resolution on weapons of mass destruction? The USA has never respected the UN that it considers a hindrance. If you doubt me, just remember the 2003 non-UN authorized activities in progress in Iraq or just walk down the streets of the USA for opinions on the UN and the resounding response will be, "I don't want any Arab or African telling me what to do!" and yet, the majority of the USA see nothing wrong with george bush junior dictating to others how to manage their lives in their own country! How tragic that the UN would so fail in its goal to protect the dignity and rights of all people.
Non-malleable must go!
If people made it this far, regardless, they are capable, regardless, of making it through tomorrow's tougher circumstances, with perhaps suggestive assistance from sympathizers. No nation is perfect. No political ideology is without flaws. I dare any nation that is free of tyrants and of human rights violations to step onto the trial seat!
Why was it necessary for Iraq to rid itself of its weapons of mass destruction, while the USA, Russia, Israel, India, Pakistan, etc did not comply with UN resolutions on weapons of mass destruction? Please, do not forget Hiroshima, Grenada, Panama (and where, by the way, is Mr. Noriega?), Libya, etc. Just imagine what would have happened if the tables were turned on the USA on weapons of mass destruction. Hypocrisy/ a double-standard will render almost anything distasteful.
Terrorists!
About terrorism: Some dictionaries define "TERRORISM" as "the unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intent of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons." Woe unto any sane human being with commonsense that ever forgets that in March 2003, the United States of America and the governments of Great Britain, Spain and their materialistic government allies "TERRORIZED", invaded, humiliated and completely disregarded the innocents of Iraq in their! own! land! Any nation, government, or individual that agrees with the USA led, March 2003, human robots controlled activities in and around Iraq is not a friend of democracy, and understands not the meanings of "democracy" or "human rights".
Who would have believed some seventeen(17) years ago that the USSR would today be history? Life sure has a way of playing jokes on us all.
Regards, L'Afrique.
