Worst Article Ever       No one wants to read a poorly written article (like some of the ones in the October 2001 Observer).  “But what makes a good article?” you ask.  Well, that’s kind of difficult to explain so I’ll just tell you what makes a bad one.   You’ll see what makes articles bad and maybe even the worst article, EVER.          One thing that makes an article bad is redundancy.  It just makes the writer look bad if they use the same bad adjectives all the time.  It also makes the author look bad when sentence structure is always the same.  It is also bad when they make bad analogies.  The lesson learned from this: Redundancy is repetitive and bad.       Other people, like that guy that did that thing, make their articles incoherent because they are ambiguous.  Ambiguity leaves the audience lost like George W., who really isn’t smart.  But hey, who else was there, Gore. He’s a robot.  And how ‘bout that election last year, huh?  It was really close, but I think I still should’ve won.  I would’ve been a great president.  Y’know  Charlton Heston would probably make a good president.  He did take on those apes. Damn those dirty apes! No, not the WOPs.  Oh, profanity is never good it may offend someone.  And uh…yeah,  no racial slurs either  the public tends not to like that.  What was I saying?  Oh yeah! Apes. Yeah they could right better articles than some people.  And I’m not even talking about the smart ones that know sign language.  Oops! That was a wild tangent.  Don’t ever use those.  Or contractions for that matter or incomplete sentences.  What about paragraphing?  How should I know. And that’s why this is the worst article, EVER.