A Segregated Society
Plessy v. Fergusson (1896)
In 1890, Louisiana passed a statute called the "Separate Car Act", which stated "that all railway companies carrying passengers in their coaches in this state, shall provide equal but separate accommodations for the white, and colored races, by providing two or more passenger coaches for each passenger train, or by dividing the passenger coaches by a partition so as to secure separate accommodations. . . . " The penalty for sitting in the wrong compartment was a fine of $25 or 20 days in jail.
The Plessy
case was carefully orchestrated by both the Citizens'
Committee to Test the Constitutionality of the Separate Car Act, a group of
blacks who raised $3000 to challenge the Act, and the East Louisiana Railroad
Company, which sought to terminate the Act largely for monetary reasons. They
chose a 30-year-old shoemaker named Homer Plessy, a
citizen of the
In the criminal district
court for the parish of
Thirteenth Amendment Section
1. Neither
slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof
the party shall have been duly convicted, shall
exist within the |
Fourteenth Amendment Section
1. All persons
born or naturalized in the |
John Howard Ferguson was
the judge presiding over Plessy's criminal case in
the district court. He had previously declared the Separate Car Act
"unconstitutional on trains that traveled through several states."
However, in Plessy's case he decided that the state
could choose to regulate railroad companies that operated solely within the
state of
Plessy appealed the case to the Louisiana
State Supreme Court, which affirmed the decision that the