Outcome of the unranked paired-comparison of the three alternatives and four decision factors is tabulated in Tables 5.3 to 5.6.
Table 5.2 Example Information for Trade-off Analysis

Decision factor	A1	A2	A3
F1	Decreases air quality by 5%	Decreases air quality by 20%	Decreases air quality by 12%
F2	Decreases water quality by 10%	Decreases water quality by 15%	Decreases water quality by 5%
F3	Decreases land productivity by25%	Decreases land productivity by15%	Decreases land productivity by10%
F4	Ambient noise level 65 dBA	Ambient noise level 60 dBA	Ambient noise level 60 dBA

Table 5.3 Ranking of Alternatives Relative to F1

Alternatives	Assignment of desirability						Sum	ACC
A1	1	1	1	.	.	.	3	0.50
A2	0	.	.	0	1	.	1	0.17
A3	.	0	.	1	.	1	2	0.33
A4 (dummy)	.	.	0	.	0	0	0	0.00
Total	.						6	1.00

ACC = alternative choice coefficient

Table 5.4 Ranking of alternatives Relative to F2

Alternatives	Assignment of desirability						Sum	ACC
A1	1	0	1				2	0.33
A2	0			0	1		1	0.17
A3		1		1		1	3	0.50
A4 (dummy)			0		0	0	0	0.00
Total							6	1.00

Table 5.5 Ranking of Alternatives Relative to F3

Alternatives	Assignment of desirability						Sum	ACC
A1	0	0	1	.	.	.	1	0.17
A2	1	.	.	0	1	.	2	0.33
A3	.	1	.	1	.	1	3	0.50
A4 (dummy)	.	.	0	.	0	0	0	0.00
Total	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.00

Table 5.6 Ranking of Alternatives Relative to F4

Alternatives	Assignment of desirability						Sum	ACC
A1	0	0	1	.	.	.	1.0	0.16
A2	1	.	.	0.5	1	.	2.5	0.42
A3	.	1	.	0.5	.	1	2.5	0.42
A4 (dummy)	.	.	0	.	0	0	0	0.00
Total	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.00