Vijay Kumar R Zanvar wrote:

> (Oh My God!  Flames are gonna pour in...)

A realistic attitude is good.

This one 
   http://www.geocities.com/vijoeyz/faq/knr/1/swap.txt
is the opposite of Summits FAQ:
The first swap has unsequenced multiple side-effects and the 
other two swaps, have overflow problems for signed ineger types.

http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q10.3.html

-- 
pete

----------------------------------------------------------------


> > (Oh My God!  Flames are gonna pour in...)
>
> A realistic attitude is good.
>

As you can make out from my line above, my English is
still in improving phase.  I did not understand your
statement.  Is it a compliment?


> This one
>    http://www.geocities.com/vijoeyz/faq/knr/1/swap.txt
> is the opposite of Summits FAQ:
> The first swap has unsequenced multiple side-effects and the
> other two swaps, have overflow problems for signed ineger types.
>
> http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q10.3.html
>

I will provide the above link, too.

Thank You.
> --
> pete

--
Vijay Kumar R Zanvar



----------------------------------------------------------------
Vijay Kumar R Zanvar wrote:
> 
> > > (Oh My God!  Flames are gonna pour in...)
> >
> > A realistic attitude is good.
> >
> 
> As you can make out from my line above, my English is
> still in improving phase.  I did not understand your
> statement.  Is it a compliment?

Yes. 

-- 
pete

----------------------------------------------------------------

    Source: geocities.com/vijoeyz/faq/c

               ( geocities.com/vijoeyz/faq)                   ( geocities.com/vijoeyz)