Print Page | Add To Favorites | Close Window | Send To A Friend | Save This Page
FAQ # 137
QUESTION 137 : Also
read Rev. 1:4-5, "...Grace to you and peace from HIM WHO IS AND WHO
WAS AND WHO IS TO COME and from the SEVEN SPIRITS who are before His throne,
and from JESUS CHRIST, the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead
and the ruler over the kings of the earth." As we can also see, John
was undeniably a Trinitarian. Isn’t he !?
I also suggest to you that you read ALL of Revelation, and
how it INTERPRETS ITSELF! For example Rev. 1:1.
Rev 1:1 "The Revelation of Jesus
Christ."
NOT the revelation of John. NOT the revelation
of the Trinity doctrine. VERY SPECIFICALLY- 1 "The REVELATION OF
JESUS CHRIST."
Rev 1:4 "John to the seven churches
which are in Asia: Grace be unto you, and peace, FROM HIM WHICH IS, AND
WHICH WAS, AND WHICH IS TO COME.”
Who does JOHN reveal is "He which
is, and which was, and which is to come"?
Rev 1:8 "I AM ALPHA AND OMEGA, the
beginning and the ending, saith THE LORD, WHICH IS, AND WHICH WAS, AND
WHICH IS TO COME, the Almighty.”
And who is this "Alpha and Omega"
who is "He which is, and which was, and which is to come"?
Rev 22:13 "I am Alpha and Omega,
the beginning and the end, the first and the last... 16 I JESUS..."
(No wonder it's called "the Revelation of Jesus Christ!”).
So how is it, or where is it that John
says that "He which is, and which was, and which is to come"
is a Separate Person [s] from Jesus Christ? Why does John tell us in another
place that Jesus (the Alpha and Omega) is "He which is, and which
was, and which is to come" if, according to you, in verse 4 he means
to demonstrate that they are Separate Persons? Is John trying to confuse
us?
Why do you have
to get absurd in order to prove your doctrine? If it says it, quote it,
if it doesn't, deny it, what is so hard about that?
{Source: Tom
R.}
Go to top of Page | Get the Book | Buy it here or here or here or here | More FAQ's