AMERICAN investigators
are considering resorting to harsher interrogation techniques,
including torture, after facing a wall of silence from jailed
suspected members of Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda network, according
to a report yesterday.
More than 150 people who were picked up after September 11 remain
in custody, with four men the focus of particularly intense
scrutiny. But investigators have found the usual methods have failed
to persuade any of them to talk.
Options being weighed include “truth” drugs, pressure tactics and
extraditing the suspects to countries whose security services are
more used to employing a heavy-handed approach during
interrogations.
“We’re into this thing for 35 days and nobody is talking.
Frustration has begun to appear,” a senior FBI official told The
Washington Post.
Under US law, evidence extracted using physical pressure or
torture is inadmissible in court and interrogators could also face
criminal charges for employing such methods. However, investigators
suggested that the time might soon come when a truth serum, such as
sodium pentothal, would be deemed an acceptable tool for
interrogators.
The public pressure for results in the war on terrorism might
also persuade the FBI to encourage the countries of suspects to seek
their extradition, in the knowledge that they could be given a much
rougher reception in jails back home.
One of the four key suspects is Zacarias Moussaoui, a French
Moroccan, suspected of being a twentieth hijacker who failed to make
it on board the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania. Moussaoui was
detained after he acted suspiciously at a Minnesota flying school,
requesting lessons in how to steer a plane but not how to take off
or land. Both Morocco and France are regarded as having harsher
interrogation methods than the United States.
The investigators have been disappointed that the usual
incentives to break suspects, such as promises of shorter sentences,
money, jobs and new lives in the witness protection programme, have
failed to break the silence.
“We are known for humanitarian treatment, so basically we are
stuck. Usually there is some incentive, some angle to play, what you
can do for them. But it could get to that spot where we could go to
pressure . . . where we don’t have a choice, and we are probably
getting there,” an FBI agent involved in the investigation told the
paper.
The other key suspects being held in New York are Mohammed Jaweed
Azmath and Ayub Ali Khan, Indians who were caught the day after the
attacks travelling with false passports, craft knives such as those
used in the hijackings and hair dye. Nabil Almarabh, a Boston taxi
driver alleged to have links to al-Qaeda, is also being held. Some
legal experts believe that the US Supreme Court, which has a
conservative tilt, might be prepared to support curtailing the civil
liberties of prisoners in terrorism cases.
However, a warning that torture should be avoided came from
Robert Blitzer, a former head of the FBI’s counter-terrorism
section. He said that the practice “goes against every grain in my
body. Chances are you are going to get the wrong person and risk
damage or killing them.”
In all, about 800 people have been rounded up since the attacks,
most of whom are expected to be found to be innocent. Investigators
believe there could be hundreds of people linked to al-Qaeda living
in the US, and the Bush Administration has issued a warning that
more attacks are probably being planned.
Newsweek magazine reports today that Mohammed Atta, the
suspected ringleader who died in the first plane to hit the World
Trade Centre, had been looking into hitting an aircraft carrier.
Investigators retracing his movements found that he visited the huge
US Navy base at Norfolk, Virginia, in February and April this
year.