QUESTIONS SEEKING ANSWERS
Please send any thoughts, ideas, or any additional information you
may have. Treat these queries as a running conversation about topics of interest. Also, send
other questions to be added to the ones already here. All replies will be treated
with confidentiality, and all additions to this running conversation will be anonymous unless
the contributor wishes to be named.
Question #1:
At the recent CFL mini-conference in NYC, Dr Carol Portlock spoke on the topic of
new directions in research. One strand of this research focuses on questions such as these:
Can abnormal stimulation lead to lymphoma? Can removal of the stimulant result in improvement?
Can immunity be enhanced so that the immune system can control the disease? She illustrated
this line of thinking with the cases of MALT lymphoma where a course of antibiotics can
sometimes cure the disease if the microorganism Helicobacter pylori is implicated in
its causation. Does anyone know more details about this research, what is being
looked at, and whether any useful practical strategies are emerging out of it?
Question #2:
Since it is possible that some yet unidentified microorganism is causing
lymphoma, wholly or in part, would it make sense for lymphoma patients to undergo
rigorous testing for noxious microorganisms and parasites, and that the treatment of any identified
microorganisms be part of our care? This seems to make sense also on the level of
preventive care -- many people with lymphoma end up with recurrent infections of one sort or another as
our immune system runs down, and we could well benefit from the sort of routine preventive
care that would monitor for signs of such noxious invasions, attempting to nip them in the bud before
the problem becomes more serious. Any thoughts?
Question #3:
People with lymphoma frequently ask
about herbal immunostimulation which is commonly used as a complementary strategy in other
cancers. The situation is complicated in lymphoma by the fact that the cancer is of the immune
system itself, and boosting the activity of the B cells may not be a good idea. On the other
hand, herbal modulation of the other components of the immune system might be.
More information is needed. If you've studied this topic, if you have a thought-out opinion
on this subject, or if you know someone who might shed more light on it, please write.
Question #4:
It is widely known that people with low grade lymphomas experience spontaneous remissions in up to 30% of the cases. These remissions typically happen over a period of several months of gradual node shrinkage. It is assumed that the immune system is
able to keep the disease in check but the mechanism is not known.
Why is it that there are no studies of people who do undergo this
remission? If we could discover what it is in the body that is able to halt
and reduce the lymphoma, then researchers could focus on replicating this
process via treatments. And since the
shrinkage is gradual, there is certainly time to alert one's oncologist and
enroll in a study lasting for say 6 months. Why is no one interested?! Hello?
Anyone? Pretty please?
Back to main menu
Created by Vera Bradova © 1998
Updated 11-22-1998
This page hosted by
Get your own Free Home Page