![]() ![]() |
Copyright Times Publishing Co. Sep 24, 2002 Re: Bush offers class-size alternative, Sept. 20. This story noted that Gov. Jeb Bush "adamantly opposes the class size measure . . . and has cited a study that found no correlation between smaller classes and learning." Does anybody know what study came up with such a conclusion? People are always saying, "Studies show . . ." in reference to education, but we are never given a chance to see these studies for ourselves. It reminds me of that old radio commercial: "Studies show that nine out of 10 doctors smoke Camel cigarettes." The last often-quoted "study" said that buying computers for classrooms was more cost-effective than maintaining class size. Unfortunately, in some schools, class sizes have gotten so high that the computers had to be moved out to provide room for more desks! I've been a teacher for 32 years. I conducted my own study the other day. I have four classes of "average" students. In the class that has 20 students, I have no grade lower than C. In my other classes, which have from 27 to 30 students, I have 30 percent earning D's and F's. In the smaller class, I have time to teach and answer questions. In the larger classes, I spend most of my time on discipline, and the only question I have to answer is, "May I use the bathroom?" So many educators support reduced class size because we want our students to learn, to succeed in school. They are your children, my friends, not political volleyballs to be tossed and back and forth between political parties, and we all want the best for them. Don't we? William F. Sutschek, New Port Richey St. Petersburg Times. St. Petersburg, Fla.: Dec 9, 2001. Imagine if we threw out all books Editor: Now that the principal has made her decision about Harry Potter being taught in school, I see there is a new tack: the Potter books promote the Wicca religion and schools are not supposed to promote any religion over another. I guess that means we have to throw out all those textbooks that include Anne Frank; they promote Judaism. We can't teach mythology, either. Learning about Zeus and Apollo promote Helenism. I guess we'd better forget about Ebenezer Scrooge, too. In fact, we'd better take out all multicultural literature out of the curriculum; just be sure we don't promote the values of any religion. Then we can do FCAT practice all year long. William Sutschek, New Port Richey © St. Petersburg Times, published May 8. 2001: Why not try another company? Re: Testing the limits, May 2.
If it isn't "easy hiring hundreds of college-educated people to
I guess the logic of the state of Florida is that as teachers are
In Michigan, retired teachers are hired at a fair salary to
Why not try another company? |
© St. Petersburg Times, published October 19. 2000:
Playing politics with schoolchildren Re: Bush school reforms get mixed grades, Oct. 11. Gov. George W. Bush makes much of his educational achievements in Texas. I'm glad Diane Rado has pointed out some of the truths about his program: Although Texas schoolchildren have improved on state tests, the nationwide test that really counts, - the SAT - shows no improvement. In fact, average scores are lower. Donna Haschke, vice president of the Texas State Teachers Association, pointed out that even though Gov. Bush approved a $3,000 raise for teachers, the union is supporting Vice President Al Gore. The conclusion is obvious: Teaching to the test may give politicians paper grades to help their campaigns, but the children are still being shortchanged. They are not learning. And when I read about cutting out some of the harder questions on the FCAT, making it easier for kids and thus raising their scores, I wonder about Gov. Jeb Bush's plans for Florida. Are our children a political tool, too? William F. Sutschek, New Port Richey
© St. Petersburg Times, published February 29. 2000: Misplacing the dunce capRe: Students' effort is an essential part of education, letter, Feb. 25.Congratulations to the writer for an excellent letter reminding us that students are responsible for their education and that paying attention, behavior and hard work are requirements for that education. A hundred years ago, students who failed to do their work in school were made to wear dunce caps and sit in the corner. Today, when a child fails to work, the bureaucrats want to put a
dunce cap on the teachers! Don't tie the teacher's handsRe: A lesson in grading schools, March 21.There is so much emphasis on rating teachers, I have to agree with Jade Moore's comment about "low-performing students." It is not necessarily the teacher's fault when students fail to meet standards. Here is an almost hypothetical situation: Joey has been getting low C's in Mr. Standard's English class all year. On Florida Writes and FCAT, he earns the equivalent of a low C. Mary has been getting A's in Mrs. Friendly's English class all year. On Florida Writes and FCAT, she earns the equivalent of a low C. Which child has the better teacher? We are trying, you know. We are trying very hard. Unfortunately, not all the children try as hard as we do. That teacher giving the lower grades is the teacher who is honestly assessing his students based on their achievement. Don't tie his hands. Give him the tools he needs to improve those grades: fewer students per class so he can give his students more individual attention; and the right to retain those students who don't meet his standards. The rest is bureaucratic hogwash. Focusing on FCAT scores shortsighted© St. Petersburg Times, published December 2, 1998:Re: School teaches art of writing, music of math, Nov. 28 Well, I see that the teachers of Fox Hollow have obediently joined the rest of us in the statewide effort to "Teach to the Test." As we all focus on the almighty FCAT in our classrooms, one question nags at my mind: what part of our curriculum, the one that used to focus on well-rounded education, note-taking, organizing, appreciation of the arts, discussion of moral issues, etc., has been put aside? Are we graduating educated children with broad and varied insights
and vistas, with an appreciation of the humanities, or robot test-takers?
Support the governor and pass the Ritalin, please. © St. Petersburg Times, published May 24, 1998 Practice of inflating grades is insulting to teachers and students![]() Your wonderful article describes a problem I have been fighting as a teacher for nearly 30 years in two states. Articles such as yours, no matter how accurate, are usually ignored by administrators. When Pasco County School Board Chairwoman Kathleen Wolf choked back tears and pointed out that neither social promotion nor failure is acceptable, I have to ask, then what's left? Obviously, inflated grades. We are encouraged at every turn to give children undeserved grades. The latest stunt, I am told, is to make us file reports and individual plans for any student who is failing. Guess what? Already overburdened teachers will react by failing even fewer kids to avoid the paperwork. You quoted Oscar Robinson as saying we need "better-trained teachers." That is the usual remark from pompous, foolish administrators who let education get where it is today. Better-trained teachers are in the front lines, fighting the battle with kids and with supervisors whose only interest is good publicity. It's hard enough to make our lessons work in today's society, but harder yet when principles and ideals are destroyed by self-serving principals and idles who just want their schools to look good. A good teacher should have honest grades. In my field, language arts, I have always tried to be honest with the children. A child who gets a 3 of 6 on the Florida Writes test is a C student and a good teacher should grade him accordingly. An A student who scores less than 5 on Florida Writes is not an A student and the teacher who gave him an A and put him on the honor roll is a liar, who cheated him into thinking he would do better on standardized tests. Some years ago, in New York, I had a student who disliked me because I was the only teacher who didn't give him straights A's. He was above average, but in that school district, average was extremely low. Because those grades had given him an inflated image of himself, he applied for admission to Harvard, Yale and Princeton. He was turned down by all three, and it broke his heart. How many students do you know who were sent to college expecting to be doctors and lawyers, only to find out they couldn't hack it? I know several. Inflated grades are a lie. They hurt students. We need to flunk kids who don't make the grade. All we have to do is flunk them once, show them we will not back down and most kids will do the required work to improve. Most don't do the work because they don't have to. And why should they? William F. Sutschek, New Port Richey Smaller class size is the key to a better education© St. Petersburg Times, published September 11, 1998
The true figure in the average classroom is 30 students or more. And that is what is wrong with education today. Politicians can leave all kinds of paper trails trying to prove they are helping, administrators can develop all kinds of standardized tests trying to prove that they are helping, but the thing that would help the most is simply to hire more teachers and lower class size. In the past six years, I've watched the size of my middle school language arts class go up slightly, a few kids each year, until now, at above 30, we have reached the point where our time is wasted on discipline, individualized work with students is almost impossible and writing cannot be properly taught. Florida Writes requires a properly organized essay of about 400 words. With 150 students, that means the writing teacher has to read and comment on 6,000 words with each assignment. How many teachers have the time to thoroughly grade 150 essays when they have so many other assignments to grade as well? It just can't be done well without cutting corners. And too many corners have been cut for too many years in public
education. Schools need to publish the true class sizes. Then we need to
make them smaller! © St. Petersburg Times, published June 6, 1998 Setting
standards for children will help them learn Your editorials, in which you suggest that retention is no reason to assume success the second time around, are well-taken and compassionate, but you forget that this is an age of grade inflation as well as social promotion. In 30 years of teaching, I have never met a student who failed because he couldn't learn the concepts. He failed because he chose not to do the work! All teachers offer remediation to children who have difficulty understanding material in class. That's what teaching is all about. The problem is not a student's inability to learn; it's about the student's apathy, his inability to care if he succeeds in school. He knows he's going to be promoted anyway, so why should he bother to work hard? Today, a child can earn a passing grade simply by copying a friend's homework papers every night, but even that -- even that -- is more effort than some of these children are willing to make. If we set standards, and enforce them, children will learn that
there are consequences for laziness, and do their work. Why is it so difficult
for the educational hierarchy to understand this simple psychological concept?
|