|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class Debate : The British Industrial Revolution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teacher
Name: Ms. Weber |
|
|
|
|
|
Student
Name: ________________________________________ |
|
|
|
CATEGORY |
A (4 points) |
B (3 points) |
C (2 points) |
D (1 point) |
Your Score |
|
Understanding
of Topic |
The team clearly understood the
topic in-depth and presented their information forcefully and convincingly. |
The team clearly undestood the
topic in-depth and presented their information with ease. |
The team seemed to understand the
main points of the topic and presented those with ease. |
The team did not show an adequate
understanding of the topic. |
|
|
Information |
All information presented in the
debate was clear, accurate and thorough. |
Most information presented in the
debate was clear, accurate and thorough. |
Most information presented in the
debate was clear and accurate, but was not usually thorough. |
Information had several
inaccuracies OR was usually not clear. |
|
|
Rebuttal |
All counter-arguments were
accurate, relevant and strong. |
Most counter-arguments were
accurate, relevant, and strong. |
Most counter-arguments were
accurate and relevant, but several were weak. |
Counter-arguments were not
accurate and/or relevant |
|
|
Use of
Facts/Statistics |
Every major point was well
supported with several relevant facts, statistics and/or examples. |
Every major point was adequately
supported with relevant facts, statistics and/or examples. |
Every major point was supported
with facts, statistics and/or examples, but the relevance of some was
questionable. |
Every point was not supported. |
|
|
Respect
for Other Team |
All statements, body language,
and responses were respectful and were in appropriate language. |
Statements and responses were
respectful and used appropriate language, but once or twice body language was
not. |
Most statements and responses
were respectful and in appropriate language, but there was one sarcastic
remark. |
Statements, responses and/or body
language were consistently not respectful. |
|
|
Presentation
Style |
Team consistently used gestures,
eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the
attention of the audience. |
Team usually used gestures, eye
contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the
attention of the audience. |
Team sometimes used gestures, eye
contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the
attention of the audience. |
One or more members of the team
had a presentation style that did not keep the attention of the audience. |
|
|
Organization |
All arguments were clearly tied
to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion. |
Most arguments were clearly tied
to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion. |
All arguments were clearly tied
to an idea (premise) but the organization was sometimes not clear or logical. |
Arguments were not clearly tied
to an idea (premise). |
|
|
|
Date
Created: Apr 04, 2004 04:30 pm (CDT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|