|
"There is no proletarian, not even a Communist movement that does not serve the interests of Money."
So wrote the German philosopher-historian Oswald Spengler 70 years ago. His observation was correct then, and as far as what has mutated into the Left today goes, the same continues to be true. When the plutocrats have sought to topple a Government not amenable to their agenda, they have often resorted to backing socialist pseudo-revolutionaries and "reformers".
Keep this quote in mind and you'll get a perspective of the situation in Malaysia, which is being subject to riots.
Since New Zealand has had its declining star hitched to the Asian economic comet, which has itself in recent months taken a dive, it behooves New Zealanders to understand something of the nature of the forces at work in Asia.
We all know that the region, whose former economic growth was promoted as the cure-all for New Zealand's economic ills, has suddenly been reduced to chaos.
What is not understood is the relationship between the rioting in Malaysia and the usury banking swindle.
Why is Malaysia suddenly the focus of riots and incipient revolution? We believe the answer lies in that nation having taken steps to get out of the grip of plutocracy. Malaysia has rejected the Free Trade policies that the International Monetary Fund demanded she and other Asian nations adopt in return for loans. Instead Malaysia has opted to return to the economic nationalism that was responsible for Asian economic progress in the first place.
Has the fact that Malaysian Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad been the first to reject the IMF's free market economic agenda any connection to the riots he is now facing in support of his former deputy PM and Finance Minister Anwar Ibrahim?
Mahathir has been the only statesman in Asia to publicly nail the currency speculation on Jewish usurers for Asia's economic plight. Specifically, he has blamed international financier George Soros. In order to block currency speculation Malaysia has made its currency nonconvertible and subject to control by the Central Bank; lowering interest rates and increasing the money supply in actions very close to Social Credit and the economic policies that got NS Germany and Fascist Italy into a war at the instigation of the plutocrats.
In response, Malaysia has been blasted by the bankers, and especially Soros. Alan Greenspan, chairman of the US Federal Reserve, has criticized Malaysia before the US Congress.
Soros has declared that foreign exchange controls will have a disastrous effect on Malaysia and the whole region. Is this a threat?
As USA Today has commented, "if Dr Mahathir's formula works for Malaysia, the wisdom of the IMF's draconian rescue packages will come under question in other countries." Hence, the free market economics of the usurers is under threat.
Are the usurers supporting the deposed Anwar Abrahim? Are they fomenting the riots, which are of course being promoted by the media as a popular revolt for democratic reforms?
The real reason for Anwar's removal by Mahathir was that he was constantly challenging the Prime Minister's economic policies and supported the IMF's austerity policies. According to Time (22 June) "from the start, Anwar assured the world [read global plutocracy - Ed.] that no matter what Mahathir declared, as finance minister he would be making rational decisions behind the scenes."
The same issue of Time states that at the time, when Mahathir was arguing for lowered interest rates, Anwar and central bank governor Ahmad Mohd Don were insisting that money remain tight, as per the free market policies of the IMF.
Now, because Mahathir has ridded himself of a subversive working "behind the scenes" (sic) in the interests of currency speculators and the IMF, the plutocrats' obedient dogs of the world media, in tandem with bogus revolutionaries and "reformers" are playing their usual lackey role for global banking, behind the usual phoney slogans of "democracy".
Soros, a power in Eastern Europe, backs the Socialist Left there, including the ex-Communists, in an effort to halt any resurgence of nationalism. According to Forbes magazine (April 7, 1997) Soros controls the news media in Eastern Europe, using his influence to promote Leftist candidates in elections; ex-communists now posing as "democratic reformers". Forbes quotes a fellow Jewish banker, who is a friend of Soros', as stating "Soros is terrified of right-wing nationalism."
Soros and his ilk know that nationalism will mean an end to their system of economic control. Does it not seem likely then that the same Hidden Hand which funds socialist movement in Eastern Europe to thwart nationalism is also playing the same role in Malaysia, whose currency regulations threaten to upset the plutocratic agenda in this major economic region?
|
|
