Insights, regarding F.M.E.P. As written for newspaper.
With respect to F.M.E.P., on Dec.24/01 I went to Surrey Provincial Court to obtain the necessary forms to suspend their actions. My employer informed me that they would now be deducting $532.00 a month, without even the required paper work, merely on a phone call.
I currently have been having trouble with my lower spine and as a result had to reduce to my hours of work dramaticly. Ten years ago I had major spinal surgery, and only now, since Oct.21/01, have I been experiencing trouble again. I am getting better slowly, but am still not healed. I am forced to continue working as this garnishment prevents me from going on disability to heal.
Anyway, while at the Provincial court registry, I discovered, that not only did F.M.E.P. not follow procedure, by first obtaining the necessary approval from the Supreme court to enforce it at a Provincial level, They further neglected to file this attatchment of my wages with the Provincial court from which they were supposably issuing it. In fact,three months after the fact, I discovered that Surrey Provincial Court did not even have a record of this attatchment. Surprised? I'm not, given what I have seen of this regime so far.
Needless to say, I am now compelled to file an action against F.M.E.P., in the same court from which their phony attatchment originated. I have included a copy of my affidavit. I have turned a blind eye to their neglagence  for the past three months, with regards to the $266.00 a month they have been garnishing. My reason being, my issue is not with contributing to my daughter's well being. But to now be expected to allow them to double dip, without due process, I have to draw the line.
So now it is time to deliver the message to F.M.E.P. that they too are not above the law, to insure accountability, and to let them know that their contemptious disregard to due process is not acceptable. I know from the horror stories I have heard, that this regime has for to long, with power, might, and without mercy, layed waste to far to many innocent lives without recourse.
Now, having read the maintenance act, I am completely appaled and astounded to learn of their impunity. It is no wonder they have become the absolute horror of the far to often innocent. To think that we have allowed such an organization to manifest itself within a democratic society is an insult if their ever was one. I have read the act, and to know that F.M.E.P. has such power, to even infringe upon are liberties and freedoms as blue printed within the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is unacceptable.
  I also believe that this organizations collective objectives and priorities, has like a cancer hid its ugliness by attatching itself to "The Rights Of The Child". Much like the leach attatched to the whale. Even more disturbing, is knowing that we have allowed the appointed Parlimentry powers of our very Justice division to endorse and enforce their actions makes me ill. To know that our children's lives are used as a commodity to generate revenue ,off the destruction of families is pathetic.
I have to speak out against this. This is not to say that I feel there should not be a gaurdian over the best intrests of our children. Reality says it is crucial. However I know that the fundimental principles and priorities allowing the construction of such an institution entrenched, are secondary, and an illusion of disguise, for another alterior agenda, with our present example, F.M.E.P. Stripped of its disguise, Themis, (Company identification); This makes way to an obtainable object of accountability. The Justice dept. is protected with impunative powers, however I am of belief that the Justice institute as a body is not an adversary. More so, it is the extension (Themis) of that body that requires amputation, like a cancer.
In support of my conviction to the task is knowing that this subcontracted extension known as Themis, can dictate and ruin the lives of so many is frightening. An individual can be jailed indeffinately upon the organizational staff of Themis's recomendation. However within the Charter of Rights and Freedoms it states that no individual can be imprisoned indeffinately because of his debt. A life sentence, (25 years) reserved for the statute of murder carries less punishment. More importantly, compare not only the process, but the credentials and requirements of Education, that we have assigned to this important task, to the reality of the agents within Themis, and I can honestly say from my own personal knowledge, research, and inside approach, can convey to you that we taxpaying, voting citizens are being victimized for our bucks worth.
Jan.2002
Page # 1
Next