Synchronous Folds Giving Rise to Consciousness and Matter

Without additional presuppositions not derivable from the supposition of the big bang, although the original high acceleration would have decreased, the velocity would have continued to increase. Thus, a large portion of the gas, if not all of it, would have completed its disbursement a long time ago or if any interstellar gas remained it would be unevenly distributed. Hypothesis (2) ignore the facts that the interstellar gas is mostly hydrogen and at the beginning must have been accommodated in a very small space with greater density than the interstellar gas we now observe. The stars would have been much closer together and their mutual attraction much greater. Then, why did they separate? Why the big bang?

The recognition of the synchronous folds of the Enfolding Universe explains the obserable universe. According to this hypothesis, the interstellar gas is being constantly replenished. The gas is subject to the inward recessional and centripetal force that is termed gravity. What is lost in a regiom by the disbursement of the gas is replaced by newly originated gas. Even if we had no evidence that hydrogen exist in outer space, the Enfolding Universe would predict its existence. Thus, the hydrogen gas is evidence in support of the The Enfolding Universe.

Defenders of the big bang theory claim that the cosmic microwave background bears evidence from an earlier and denser period in the universe. They also use the cosmic microwave background to support a gravitational instability paradigm, the view that gravity for some inexplicable reason can make wrinkles into galaxies. Thus, these defenders assert that the sea of primordial light we observe in microwaves supports the big bang model of the universe. In fact, they are piling presuppositions upon presuppositions.

There is no background of radiation dating from any big bang. Light is not radiant energy but an active force. The cosmic microwave background is evidence of the constant emergence of operative forces into our segue. The effect of centripetal forces and how they relate to centrifugal forces are improperly treated as motion and as radiant energy. Force is not motion even though force might give rise to motion, which in turn can become energy in motion or radiant energy. However, what scientists generally treat as motion of particles is not that at all but a result of confusing the interplay of centripetal and centrifugal forces with motion. The apparent expansion of the universe arise from a centrifugal force towards the macrocosm; and the formation of galaxies did not arise because of wrinkles or gravitational instability but arose as a part of the attractive, centripetal force to a point of apparent extinction. It is unfortunate that some scientists make the simple beauty of manifestation into convoluted and contrived nonsense.

Under general relativity, Einstein did not abolish the notion of "ether" in one sense, and he clearly retained the notion of a featured environment. He replaced featureless space with an environment with physical properties that he called space--a space very different from space under the Unified Theory. The concept of space as a container was wisely abolished by Einstein. In this respect the Unified Theory and General Relativity are in agreement, but under the Unified Theory space is an attribute of motion arising from centripetal and contrifugal forces. Under General Relativity space became a geometric construct with properties similar to those previously attributed to a construct termed ether. He replaced an highly convoluted consruct with an equally convoluted construct. Einstein attempted to explain all reality in terms of only one dimension, not a very wise thing to do. Gravitation, in turn, was explained as a departure from Euclidean geometry, with motion appearing as a constant in flat space and as acceleration in curved space. Acceleration, however, is not motion but is the product centripetal or centrifugal forces. Acceleration under general relativity being, in effect, the product of "curved space" was really an indirect way of attributing to curve space centripetal and centrifugal forces. He came very close to the conclusions of the Unified Theory, but never recognized that some of the features he attrubuted to space, in many respects, would be more consistent with light being an active force and not radiant energy. The convoluted nature of space under general relativity resulted from Einstein`s treating light as radiant energy or moving particles and not as an active force.

The discoveries of the Enfolding Universe based on the Unified Theory establish that Einstein failed to recognize the significance of the enfolding of force and form and how that enfolding manifests itself in the two-way recessional flow. Light is not radiation but comes into manifestation from union of the centrifugal force from the microcosm with the centripetal force from the macrocosm. Thereafter, as an active force and with equal probability light becomes a part of either the centripetal force towards the microcosm or the centrifugal force towards the mcrocosm. Light is not energy but as a force its gives rise to energy, and many scientists have confused the effect of force with force itself.

General relativity treats gravity and acceleration as equivalent, but it does not treat expansion of the universe and acceleration as equivalent. In the Enfolding Universe, and under the Unified Theory, the expansion of the universe and acceleration are equivalent, and gravity and acceleration are likewise equivalent, but expansion is not equivalent to contraction or origination to extinction.

Acceleration is an inherent byproduct of the centripetal-centrifugal forces that constitute the two-way flow. The constant engorgement of phenomena with the momentum of the space-time recessions results in the phenomenological acceleration relative to a given segue from speeds less than to speeds equal to that measure of velocity extrapolated from that relationship between phenomena that manifest itself as light. Light is not a participant in the flow but is the force that gives rise to particles that are participants in the flow. Where the engorgement is that of an inward space-time recession, the manifestation becomes a part of an accelerating centripetal movement to a point of apparent extinction, construed in our segue as gravity. Likewise, if the engorgement is of an inward space-time recession, the result is an accelerated movement from a point of apparent origination, with acceleration being dependent on the increassing distance of receding objects from one another, construed in our segue as the expansion of the universe.

The two-way flow theory also explains the relation of matter to consciousness. Consciousness is necessarily infinitely divisible. It is consciousness that gives rise to time and space, which, in turn, give rise to motion, which, in turn, gives rise to the phenomena of our universe. Matter is derivative from consciousness; thus many scientists are incorrect in believing that consciousness is derivative from matter. Biological life as well as inorganic life is necessarily infinitely divisible, and the cell is infinitely divisible as organic life. An understanding of both biological evolution and the table of periodic elements result from the immense explanatory ower of the two-way flow theory. After centrifugal and centripetal forces have given rise to motion, resultant motions towards the macrocosm are centrifugal and resultant motions towards the microcosm are centripetal. It is the union of centrifugal and centripetal motions, which should not be confused with centrifugal and centripetal forces, that gives rise to the hydrogen diatomic molecule and thereafter the table of periodic elements.

The two-way flow theory recognizes, as did Alfred Schmid, that the so-called velocity of light is illusory only, and the two-way flow theory anticipated the results of recent experiments in quantum mechanics, including experiments showing that the transmission of a photon of light is affected by the reception of the same photon of light Even the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment, the genesis for the formulation of the Lorentz transformations, are more consisten with the view that the experiment established that light was an active force and were clearly inconsisten with the view that light was radiant energy.Light is manifested by the relationship between what scientists treat as the points of transmission and of reception, with the travel between these points being illusory, with its velocity being an extrapolation from the time required for light to became manifested between the two points.

Experiments construed by scientists as slowing the alleged velocity of light to a dead stop (see Time, January 29, 2001 and U.S.News and World Report), March 19, 2001) are much better explained by the recognition that light is an active force than the assumption that it is radiant energy. In these experiment, scientists fired a laser light into an-inky vapor of atoms and the vapor became transparent to a second pulse of light, and the laser or first beam of light is then turned off. Along with the transparency of the vapor, the second pulse was allegedly slowed to a fraction of its original velocity and in later experiment slowed to a dead stop. The first beam is then turned on again, and the second beam again manifested velocity of light at its top speed.

The scientists explained that the first beam prevented the electrons from resonating, making the vapor transparent to the second beam. They treat the light as being in a frozen state until the first beam is turned on again. The second beam is said to be compressed to a fraction of its original length and "stored" in the form of altered energy states and spin patterns in the atoms. The turning on the first beam reconstituted the second beam and light is restored as a form of radiant energy.

The active force of the laser beam resulted in centipetal and centrifugal forces that were in union together to become disassociated from their union. with the result that the vapor of atoms became transparent. Centripetal and centrifugal forces are necessarily transparent, and in fact it is their union together that results in light as an active force. Both the transparency and disassociation were temporary in natue, taking place in only a fraction of a second, and after the centripetal and centrifugal forces came together again, light would necessarily be manifested. The storage theory is absurd.

The commitment of the science community to false assumptions is considerable, and many scientists cling to false assumptions by a process of convolution based upon other false assumptions supporting still other false assumptions. They recognize that major assumptions underlying science must be wrong and that an Unified Theory is required for science to continue its forward advance. Their reluctance to face the revision of existing paradigms is great, but the powerful explanatory power of both the Enfolding Universe and of the Unified Theory should overcome that reluctance.

That light is an active force would necessary require events to be simutaneous once the field has been set up. Under the views of Dr. Schmid (see THE MARVEL OF LIGHT An Excursus, by Alfred Schmid, unfortunately out of print), the electromagnetic field theorem requires simultaneity of interaction once the bridge of field has been set up, whereas there would be a delay between impulses at the transmitter and receiver equal to the velocity of light, according to Maxwell`s equations. Where the so-called speed of recession of galaxies exceeds that of light, what is really happening is that the distance between them can no longer be manifested in terms of light or, in other words, as a result of the two-way flow, light has left one segue and has emerged into the segue macroscopic to the segue from which it has departed.

The conventional big bang theory does not necessarily assert that the galaxies are receding from one another at a speed exceeding that of light. Some scientists also inapprpriately apply the doppler effect to light, stating that light moving away from the observer would shift to the red end of the spectrum. However, more thoughtful followers of the big bang theory, would state that it is space that is expanding and that the galaxies are not really receding from one another {see Misconceptions About the Big Bang by Charles H. Lineweaver and Tamara M. Davis, Scientific American, March 2005}. In other words, as space expands the distance between galaxies increase, even though the galaxies are not receding from one another. The doppler effect would not apply to increases in distance caused by the expansion of space. The movement is scalar in nature.

� Laureate Wilson Ogg